Objectable said:
And this is why you shouldn't be stupid.
Don't be stupid people.
I agree, the judge should have been less stupid.
Chaosritter said:
Serves that little shit right. Tasteless jokes in private are one thing, tasteless jokes on a platform that is known for ruining lifes is just stupid.
I guess whenever somone makes a Pun on the escapists we should jail him as well.
Doomsdaylee said:
Good. Throw the little shit in prison, or rather, a damn padded cell. I mean, I'm all for freedom of speech and the GIFT, but still, saying shit like that deserves punishment. 8 years is harsh, but maybe next time he won't try to seem edgy and cool.
Yes, throw everyone who dares to make a joke on the internet in prison! Oh, wait, i used irony in this response, i might as well go and give myself up now for i am a wanted criminal!
Doomsdaylee said:
Funny thing is, all these people crying about how he should be left alone would be doing the exact opposite, (I.E. "Why didn't they lock him up, he even said he was, who's stupid enough to ignore that on just a "jk, lol.") if he actually did go shoot up a school.
He never intended to go shoot up a school, nor he did it. He is being charged for a crime he did not commit nor ever intended to. Should i be charged for murder if i made a joke about "killing somone"?
Doomsdaylee said:
There's "to soon to make a joke" (I.E. Making a joke about Paul Walker in Fast and Furious), and theres "Cops are still on the look out." (I.e. Murder happens in my neighborhood, and I say "I'm on to the next one!")
There is no "too soon", only people who think their lack of sense of humour is grounds for punishing others.
Hawk eye1466 said:
He deserves the stress and fear he'll probably go through during the trial but not jail, the best thing would be to let the trial go through and when the jury says guilty the judge gives him all 8 years says jk lol and then gives him some community service.
So, then, by this logic we should put the judge on trial for making stupid "jokes" in public. But no, you want double standards, punish lol players, praise others acting the same.
Doomsdaylee said:
You're one of those people who think that if someone makes a suicide note or threat, that they're just trying to get attention or "joking" aren't you?
If the note itself states that it is a joke - yes it is a joke.
Pebkio said:
Okay... let's put his comments into a different arena:
Imagine an 18-year-old speaking on his speaker phone outside of his house whilest there is a crowd gathered and he says, out load, for all the people to hear (right after a recent school shooting) "I'm going to shoot up a school full of kids... lol... just kidding." Yeah, no, someone would likely punch his lights out before he got to the "j" in "just kidding".
Then the person punching "his lights out" is the one deserving the jailtime.
Alarien said:
I think six months serving as after-school janitor sounds just about right.
Punishment well deserved, but prison is just stupid.
If you mean that what the Judge should do then yes, punishment well deserved. The kid on the other hand should have been compensated for being mistreated.
valium said:
what he said was unlawful
No, it was not. Comedy is not unlawful.
loa said:
The victim blaming is strong in this thread.
Fuck people.
Careful. Here at the escapist we got a double standart that we can say anything about people in the news report but as soon as you say something about people here your in for a ban.
valium said:
The victim in this case being?
One Justin Carter
Icehearted said:
Some things you can't joke about The frivolous use of the word rape, for example.
No, there are no things you cant joke about.
Also, may i direct you to the phenomenon of "Sloth rapists"?
not_you said:
You can't say something like that and expect nothing to happen... He deserves everything he gets and I hope that other bottom-feeders who have the same kind of reactions learn a lesson from this...
What the kid deserves is public apology and compensation of mistreatment. What he gets are a bunch of idiots treating him like a high class criminal for making a joke.
GladiatorUA said:
It would be nice to have a legal example of consequences for threats online. Joke or not.
It would be horrific to have a precedent of punishing people legally for jokes. Thats outright banning of comedy you got there.
valium said:
More like, you can not yell fire in a crowded theater. As I said, we might have freedom of speech, but that does not mean we can say whatever we want without consequences.
But you can. Actually i did once. We were watching a movie when suddenly the electricity cut out and only the emergency exit lights remained on as they were on battery power. I made a joke about everyone burning down now, everyone laughed and noone got hurt. So yes, i yelled fire in the crowded theater and nothing came of it. Thats called making a joke.
Little Gray said:
How stupid do you have to be to "joke" about shooting up a school when several schools were recently shot up in a country that was already insanely paranoid about this type of shit. I say the gene pool will be better off if this kid spends some more time behind bars.
Less stupid than to take his joke as a real threat.
reiniat said:
"The kid was obviously making a joke"
I DONT CARE,
And hats why we have laws, so people who only care about thier personal ideas do not dictate the society. Mainly so you cant just say i dont care so lets punish him. You are WRONG not to care.
not_you said:
Again, you can't just say shit like that and expect to get away with it...
no matter how many "lol" or "jk" you put on the end...
Serious threats deserve serious consequences
Yes, you can, and you should, because jokes and sarcasm should never feel threatened by though police.
Seriuos threats deserve seriuos consequences, anyone with a workign braincell would be able to see that this threat was not seriuos.
mrhateful said:
what happened to that first amendment??
Sorry, only the second ammendment exists in US.
coolkirb said:
The Wild West days of the internet will come to an end soon. And why the charges may be extreme and unwarranted in this case I think this highlights how the days of not being accountable for what you do online are coming to an end.
Yes, we should all delebrate as they ban speech and remove our ability to make comedy, for we are getting more "Civilized".
DjinnFor said:
Words do not hurt people and using words is not a crime under any circumstances, end of discussion. No prison sentence, no slap on the wrist, nothing. When something actually happens and someone gets hurt, then you can talk about the "justice" that's backed with the iron fist of the law and the iron chains of the prisons.
Anything less, and you're effectively advocating for a violent response to a nonviolent action, making you just as bad as, if not worse than those you condemn and invalidating your position outright.
I think by the end of it the guy should be suing the state back because it was their completely ludicrous actions that has lead him to being repeatedly raped and mutilated for MONTHS. There already was a violent response. And the victim is still being charged for not doing anything unlawful.
valium said:
Was the ramifications of what this idiot said a bit extreme?
Yes.
Does that mean he should get a slap on the wrist? Should we throw personal accountability and responsibility out the window so people can feel better about the terrible shit they say on the internet?
No.
What you say has consequences, think about that the next time you threaten people, even in jest.
Its funny how you consider it "a bit extreme" when it was probably the overreaction of a decade.
ANd no, he should not get a slap on a wrist, he should get a
compensations for damages done to him. We should not throw personal accountability away, we should hold the police and now the judge responsible for their actions.
Maybe next time they will think before they throw people in prison for sarcasm.
ticklefist said:
Also, if this kid is actually getting his ass kicked in jail (not prison, he hasn't been convicted of anything) then he's simply an asshole that still hasn't learned to shut his mouth and sucks at making friends.
I guess being repeatedly raped and tortured to the point of being put on suicide watch qualifies as "sucks at making friends" right?
PH3NOmenon said:
Giving him a couple of hundred hours of community service seems way more reasonable. People pleading for jailtime are, in my opinion, off their rockers.
and people who think a kid that was already repeatedly raped deserves more punishment for making a joke are not off their rockers?
MoltenSilver said:
On the one hand, I don't feel like this is a failure of the justice system, as many other people feel it is. There is a reason uttering threats is illegal, and this definitely counts as a threat imo; this is beyond tasteless, and the fact that it was a joke doesn't excuse it all in my opinion.
I think you need to look up a legal definition of a threat. Its right there on page 6 of this very own thread.
And what he did was not even tasteless, but we will have this discussion after at least half the people on this board realize he is the victim.