Judge Rules Lineage Lawsuit May Proceed

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
Judge Rules Lineage Lawsuit May Proceed


The man who sued NCsoft for his addiction to Lineage II [http://www.amazon.com/Lineage-II-4th-Anniversary-Pc/dp/B00134WX4S/ref=pd_sim_dbs_vg_5] has scored a victory of sorts after a judge ruled that the game's End User License Agreement doesn't preclude him from launching a lawsuit and seeking damages.

What do you do after you've sunk 20,000 hours of your life into an MMO and rendered yourself a useless, non-functioning piece of garbage who can't be bothered to bathe, get dressed or even communicate with your fellow human beings? If you're Craig Smallwood of Hawaii, you NCsoft's [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/102914-Lineage-II-Junkie-Sues-NCsoft-for-His-Addiction] assertion that the EULA forbids such lawsuits, the judge in the case has decided to let it go ahead.

The Lineage II user license states that "in no event shall NC Interactive ... be liable to you or to any third party for any special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages ... regardless of the theory of liability" arising from the use of its service. But rather than dismiss the suit, Judge Alan C. Kay "noted that both Texas and Hawaii law bar contract provisions that waive in advance the ability to make gross-negligence claims." As a result, he ruled that Smallwood's case may proceed.

The judge also allowed Smallwood's claims for negligence, defamation and negligent infliction of emotional distress to stand, although as lawyer Steve Roosa noted on the Freedom to Tinker [http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/blog/sroosa/software-license-agreement-takes-it-chin] blog, "The fact that the gross negligence claims survived is significant in and of itself, but in reality having the right to sue for 'gross negligence' is the functional equivalent of having the right to sue for straight-up negligence as well - thus radically broadening the scope of claims that (according to the court) cannot be waived in a User Agreement."

The ruling has no bearing on the merits of the lawsuit itself but Roosa noted that it could have an impact on future cases, writing, "The Smallwood decision, if it stands, may achieve some lasting significance in the software license wars." A full copy of the ruling is available from us.archive.org [http://ia360707.us.archive.org/15/items/gov.uscourts.hid.87427/gov.uscourts.hid.87427.36.0.pdf]. (PDF format)

Source: The Register [http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/08/31/lineage_ii_eula_defeat/]


Permalink
 

Jared

The British Paladin
Jul 14, 2009
5,630
0
0
...I still hope this gets thrown out - Its rediculous!
 

DiscoAtThePanic

New member
Sep 3, 2010
75
0
0
It's been known since the 90's that most MMO EULA's were not universally enforcable and some are not enforceable at all.
 

Vaccine

New member
Feb 13, 2010
475
0
0
Self control is a wonderful thing and I'm glad I was blessed with such a basic function in my brain.

Same can't be said for this guy.
 

TerribleAssassin

New member
Apr 11, 2010
2,053
0
0
This get's through?


What has seriously happened here?

It's not the devs fault this man didn't get outside, they shouldn't be taking the wrap..
 

imnot

New member
Apr 23, 2010
3,916
0
0
Can I just say this idiot in no way represents the gamer community.
 
Apr 28, 2008
14,634
0
0
I understand people have addictive personalities and get addicted to various things, but if you can't stand up and get dressed on your own, thats not a problem with a game, its a problem with you.
 

JaymesFogarty

New member
Aug 19, 2009
1,054
0
0
This type of people is why gamers still aren't mainstream. More importantly though; why the fuck was this ever considered?
 

obisean

May the Force Be With Me
Feb 3, 2009
407
0
0
It's gonna be hilarious when games read: "Available in the US except for Hawaii, and Texas." And the millions of pissed off people will have this guy to blame.

EDIT:

FF14 is incorporating a mechanic that will somewhat keep you from playing after a bit of time, and people are flipping out, and it could cost them sales. But if they remove that feature, something like this could happen, and they could get sued. It begs the question of why games should bother being made at all. Not that I want them to stop making games, but people (and judges who let shit like this slide) need to show some restraint. If you don't show up to work, and get fired, because you were playing WoW, you don't get to sue WoW for making their game addictive.

JaymesFogarty said:
More importantly though; why the fuck was this ever considered?
Because lawyers exist.
 

Mr Companion

New member
Jul 27, 2009
1,534
0
0
Wow! I never thought this case would proceed. I guess the means I can sue the manufacturer of this stereo next to me when I helplessly bash my skull against it in frustration that these laws are applicable in any context no matter for FUCKING stupid. After all I was not warned beforehand that if I relentlessly slam my head against their sterio then it could inflict serious harm, which is gross negligence.
 

z3rostr1fe

New member
Aug 14, 2009
590
0
0
Haha!

The Amazing Tea Alligator said:
Can alcholics sue the companies that make their alchohol of choice?
Or could a chain smoker sue the tobacco company for having lung cancer from cigarettes created by them? :p
 

obisean

May the Force Be With Me
Feb 3, 2009
407
0
0
z3rostr1fe said:
Haha!

The Amazing Tea Alligator said:
Can alcholics sue the companies that make their alchohol of choice?
Or could chain smokers sue the tobacco company for having lung cancer from cigarettes created by them? :p
Don't they already do that? Or at least did?
 
May 23, 2010
1,328
0
0
z3rostr1fe said:
Haha!

The Amazing Tea Alligator said:
Can alcholics sue the companies that make their alchohol of choice?
Or could a chain smoker sue the tobacco company for having lung cancer from cigarettes created by them? :p
To be fair, cigarettes tell you that they kill, but yeah same sort of thing.
 
Jun 26, 2009
7,508
0
0
Jiraiya72 said:
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
You're avatar works for what I'm thinking at the moment. Oh, and I would edit your post with more content I got probation for something similar.
OT: Great, more stereotypes for the cynics. Thanks.