Reading it again just makes me more disgusted than I was before. You people are doing the exact same thing that those who you are fighting against are. You're using the horrible death of a child to further your own agenda. I mean, do you think that people actually buy this garbage that "video games did it"? They don't. But every time someone in the media makes a comment about it, you all get yourselves up into a lather, and screech to the heavens.ColdStorage said:The picture of the girl is used to put her as the human here, its a subconscious thing, its to celebrate who she is not to disrespect her, having a picture of WOW or the Killers would be the disrespectful thing to do.
I'd like you to re read the article, because we seem to be reading to very different stories here, because there is only one sentence dedicated to what your saying there, the rest merely details the tools used and the abhorrent nature of this act of violence this poor girl.
Because the article is doesn't mean its disrespectful to the poor girl, If Mr Andy Chalk had 3 to 4 pages to dedicate I'm sure he would, it would probably alleviate most of your fears.
Firstly, unless you're going to write an intelligent, well thought out rebuttal then you shouldn't write anything at all. "No, it didn't" is not an argument. Secondly, get the fucking picture of the dead girl down from there. If she isn't what the article is about, then you need to take it down. Seriously.