kinda doesn't change the fact 'Saga' is so widely used that it shouldn't even be up for consideration, and there for, shouldn't be allowed to do this at all
You dont have to do that. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/11/trademark-law-does-not-require-companies-tirelessly-censor-internetroseofbattle said:"We're not trying to stop Stoic from using the word Saga, but we had to oppose their application to preserve our own ability to protect our own games.
Thats because word SAGA IS fair game. its a word which has a specific definition and you should never be able to trademark it.roseofbattle said:" Otherwise, it would be much easier for future copycats to argue that the use of the word 'Saga' when related to games was fair play."
They dont have to. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/11/trademark-law-does-not-require-companies-tirelessly-censor-interneterbkaiser said:'we had to oppose their application [for ... Saga] to preserve our own ability to protect our own games'. As long as they are operating within the insanely broken US trademark system, they pretty much have to be jerks or they'll have no protection against the next Zynga coming along and creating clones of their games.
It's bullshit, trademark law doesn't work that way. King acted like a bully and is now trying to weasel out of it by blaming everything but themselves.castlewise said:I understand the reasoning behind the "we don't want to sue you but we have to because if we don't then we can't sue anybody" line, but it still sucks.