Kotick Itching to Sell Cutscenes As Films

snave

New member
Nov 10, 2009
390
0
0
When he says "remove", does that mean that the cutscenes are actually gone from the game unless you buy the game+movie bundle? Because his quote was either that or a rather poor choice of words: it's kinda the undercurrent of what hes saying.
 

Atmos Duality

New member
Mar 3, 2010
8,473
0
0
It looks like Kotick is trying to reduce the Cost : Content ratio of games even further. I'm surprised the man even bothered putting on a PR release all those months ago if all he was going to do was piss all over that goodwill.

Nevermind that the gaming industry I once knew will be naught but a dead husk in 5 years when mandatory-subscription gaming takes over, turning most (if not all) big titles into World of Warcraft money machines while offering absolutely no real lasting power in return.

But it's shit like this though that makes me saddest of all, because I know that there are a lot of assholes out there who will gladly pay that 20-30 bucks (2-5 times the going rate of any Hollywood movie in theatres) for the movies.

The market adjusts itself. As long as people are willing to give more and more for less and less, they have nobody to blame but themselves. They have no right to complain because that's precisely what they agreed to.

EDIT: I have detected some ambiguity in Mr Kotick's statement.
Is he saying that he wants to strip out the cutscenes in games (as in, remove the content from the game completely?) and sell them to the gamer at a premium?
Or is he just suggesting to resell the movies (copying them out of the game) as a stand-alone product?

Because as worded, he could mean either.
 

GamingAwesome1

New member
May 22, 2009
1,794
0
0
I do not approve of removing the cutscenes from a game and charging admission to see them.

I think the cutscene-to-film thing has potential though, see: Shenmue: The Movie for a good (and probably the only) example of this.

Although if you must, package it with the game or some sort of special edition. I ain't paying extra on the side for something that's already there.
 

KaiRai

New member
Jun 2, 2008
2,145
0
0
Jack and Calumon said:
That seems lazy and an excuse for money grabbing. I could watch the cutscenes on Youtube if I wanted to. Also, the gaps where the gameplay was will be around.

Blizzard did this before? Oh... well... Blizzard like money too.

Calumon: I like cake and money. Can I have a money cake?
I'm guessing if he manages to do this though there'll be a ton of either soundless WMG-raped custscenes, or terms of use violation removals. Nom nom nom money.
 

AndyFromMonday

New member
Feb 5, 2009
3,921
0
0
Because it's just way to hard for me to install Fraps and record every single cutscene in a game. Even easier, I can go to YouTube and watch the cutscenes on the channel of someone that recorded them themselves. Yeah, not a good idea Kotick.
 

JUMBO PALACE

Elite Member
Legacy
Jun 17, 2009
3,552
7
43
Country
USA
lapan said:
So, the games itself will not have cutscenes anymore and whoever wants to watch them has to pay? I myself do not like this and wouldnt buy such uncomplette games. Though i know many people who just dislike cutscenes in general and will probably like their new cutscene-less games.
No, they would still be in the game. It's just if you for some reason REALLY liked the cut scenes, you could buy them as a standalone item to watch whenever you wanted.
 

Talson

New member
Jun 7, 2010
54
0
0
You know, I'm starting to get the impression that Activision may be trying to milk their fans for every cent they can get...
 

Marowit

New member
Nov 7, 2006
1,271
0
0
I guess Bobby-boy thinks that developers make the gamer, and not the other way around. I can see this kind of thing being included in collectors edition or something, but as a standard feature? pffft - there is absolutely no game mechanic/play worth $60 with zero story/narrative.

SC II and MW 2 probably got him thinking about this, since so many gamers just jumped right into multiplayer and never even touched the single player campaign.

Anyway, Bobby, bring it on. Try and sell Diablo III (or Blizzards new MMO) with no narrative, and I will have absolutely no problem not buying it - simple as that.
 

KEM10

New member
Oct 22, 2008
725
0
0
lapan said:
So, the games itself will not have cutscenes anymore and whoever wants to watch them has to pay? I myself do not like this and wouldnt buy such uncomplette games. Though i know many people who just dislike cutscenes in general and will probably like their new cutscene-less games.
No, they are copying the cut scenes and making them into a movie. Notice the term copy, not cut.

Blizzard has done this before. The WCIII super-ultra hardcore-box set had a DVD of all the cut scenes included (along with a cool map of the world (of Warcraft) and an interesting book of beta sketches).

Hell, I still have my WCIII DVD. Not like I ever watched it other than to figure out what it was.
 

Redd the Sock

New member
Apr 14, 2010
1,088
0
0
I'm not sure why people are upset here. Choice of words aside, he's simply talking about marketing a game's cutscenes as a movie, not totally removing them from the game. It's not entirely unprecidented:

MGS3's collector's edition came with a DVD of the cutscenes as a movie.
Preordering Xenosaga 2 got you a DVD of Xenosaga 1's cut scenes as a movie.
I've seen bootlegs out of hong kong for the cutscenes for Final Fantasy 10, and online fan projects for the metal gear series and kingdom hearts (probably more).

People buy TV shows that are in syndication so they can watch what they want when they want to and I can see some people doing the same for games depending on the scene and the circumsances of getting it. Do I really want to play through half of Kingdom Hearts to re-watch a scene near the end of it, or re-play something teidious (say episode 3 of MGS4) to watch the cut scenes after it? Youtube? Copyright law. 20 - 30 dollars? Exactly how many hours of cutscenes are we getting? A lot of game cinematics (especialy for story based games) run longer than the typical 90 minute movie run time.

This will only work for some games. They need to be story based and well scripted. I don't see much from Activision that fits. Call me when Square Enix has the same idea.
 

Mrshilka

New member
Sep 1, 2009
2
0
0
I would be willing to buy the cutscrenes from certaing ames if they where setup for HD video and sound.

I own the Blizzard one already and when we have a one of our parties I play it and a few other HD game trailers on the big screen when its not in use.

You get alot of us myself included stopping to watch certain ones no matter how many times we seen it before.
 

Nigh Invulnerable

New member
Jan 5, 2009
2,500
0
0
Here's a few questions I have for Kotick:
1. Would these cutscenes actually be removed from the game? In other words, if I bought the game I would get no cutscenes? Lame.

2. How do you intend to make the cutscenes flow without the intervening gameplay? I know just watching the cutscenes from Armed and Dangerous is still funny, but they lose some of the context. Likewise with games like FF X, Timesplitters: Future Perfect, and many others.
 

Lt. Vinciti

New member
Nov 5, 2009
1,285
0
0
Seven Deadly Sins:

1.Lust
2.Gluttony
3.Kotick (formerly known as Greed)
4.Sloth
5.Wrath
6.Envy
7.Pride

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwDzavJIIzI - $15.00 Click Here -> [BUY]
 

JayDig

New member
Jun 28, 2008
142
0
0
Kotick obviously looking over Blizzard's (presumably) massive CGI budget and wondering how he can claw some of that money back.

A important part of the storytelling these days is during player-controlled scenes. Just the cutscenes would make a pretty disjointed movie, if the veiwer didn't know the plot.

So this would be just for the uberfan who already owns the game, but don't a lot of games have a 'replay cinematics' option in their menus?

Well they should.