Kotick Itching to Sell Cutscenes As Films

Iscin

Schism Navigator
Sep 8, 2009
49
0
0
Someone... shoot Bobby already.

Maybe all these execs are equally as greedy but... Bobby can't keep his mouth shut and it is just depressing.

T.=.T
 

Malyc

Bullets... they don't affect me.
Feb 17, 2010
3,083
0
0
hazabaza1 said:
Well, at least we won't ever get a game and then have to pay to see the cutscenes that didn't come with the game.
Right?
...Right?
Games might actually be better without cutscenes... ecpecially games like mgs4... Kojima wanted to make a movie disguised as a game, and he rewards you for watching flashbacks... Meaning that you HAVE to watch the flashbacks if you want to do the best possible.
 

ShadowEdged

New member
Sep 15, 2010
6
0
0
Ashsaver said:
....And when Kotick actually puts his plan into motion,we ought to know best not to buy them.

Then he'll learn.
Especially when Activision seem to charge more for their games than anyone else, I'm looking at you Call Of Duty, though they might have trouble removing cutscenes from that :p
 

Radelaide

New member
May 15, 2008
2,503
0
0
Mortagog said:
Jack and Calumon said:
That seems lazy and an excuse for money grabbing.
There is nothing seemingly about it. I can't believe that he keeps pulling shit like this! FUCK!
You're actually surprised? Kotick tucks himself into his bed made of money, with his sheets made of money, by a romantic money fire fuelled by money and you're surprised he wants MOAR!?
 

twm1709

New member
Nov 19, 2009
477
0
0
Kotick calls the people that would purchase such a product "enthusiast consumers," because they're willing to watch cinematics again even though they might have already beaten a copy of the game they're from.
For 20-30 bucks? I would probably call them "morons"...
 

LawlessSquirrel

New member
Jun 9, 2010
1,105
0
0
If you can take the cut-scenes from a game and release them separately without any negative effects to the story, you've not made the game very well. A good game should allow narrative through gameplay...hell, all games do to a degree. It'd be like thinking The Dark Knight only showing scenes with the Joker would be one of the best movies ever because now it doesn't have all that crazy development and cohesion getting in the way.

I guess it doesn't matter to me since I'll either actually play the game or get the Collectors Edition if I want to see the cutscenes, but it would set a bad trend in the industry if it makes any kind of profit (which it would, since manufacturing and shipping fees would be beyond negligible).

Then there's the chance it becomes mandatory by some companies also wanting a big price increase without extra cost, at which point games would be 50% more expensive if you want context and narrative with your graphics and gameplay; storylines would be disjointed and isolated, games will completely lose hope of being considered art, and naturally the success will spawn further unforeseen 'innovations' from the leaders of the industry.

A bleak future is upon us, I just pray for the strength to carry on.

Only Valve is safe from the coming storm.
 

z3rostr1fe

New member
Aug 14, 2009
590
0
0
Kotick, you retard... Why can't you just shut the fuck up? Let your Marketing Department do their thing, so shut up!
 

teknoarcanist

New member
Jun 9, 2008
916
0
0
"If gamers are spending an hour watching these computer-generated scenes while playing, why not remove them from the game and charge for viewing privileges?"

So, like...this is an Onion article, right?

Jesus Christ . . .
 

BloodSquirrel

New member
Jun 23, 2008
1,263
0
0
Tom Goldman said:
Speaking about these cutscenes, Kotick said: "If we were to take that hour, or hour and a half, take it out of the game, and we were to go to our audiences for whom we have their credit card information as well as a direct relationship and ask, 'Would you like to have the StarCraft [http://www.amazon.com/StarCraft-Battle-Chest-Pc/dp/B00001IVRD/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=videogames&qid=1284618634&sr=8-2] movie?', my guess is that ... you'd have the biggest opening weekend of any film ever."
They really need to hire a PR guy to follow Kotick around and make sure he never speaks himself.
 

The Journey

New member
Jul 12, 2010
132
0
0
Mortons4ck said:
Bobby Kotick said:
"For starters, our virtual characters don't have agents, they don't have managers, they don't have lawyers."
But voice actors do, Bobby. And they will probably start demanding a larger chunk of the cut if you do this.

Not only is this starting to crossover into tie-orphans-to-the-railroad-tracks evil, the plan is about as well thought out as an underpants gnome scheme.
I would be a happy man if Bobby Kotick was suddenly taken to the cleaners for fraud or something. I mean, the amount of money grabbing bullshit he seems to pull would definitely put up a whole bunch of huge red flags in my book. If he wants more money I'm sure he'd be more than happy not to pay taxes.

Otherwise, I want every idea he ever has to be shot down so hard it makes his children cry. They deserve it through their genes. Evil, evil man. Quite literally.

Probably a sociopath.
 

chinomareno

New member
Sep 4, 2010
40
0
0
Well, he and his cronies have tested the threshold of gamers by stripping features from many games and reselling them as DLC and been vindicated. Gamers are terrible at boycotts and cave in en-mass(MW2). Eventually expectations will lowered enough for the next wave of nickle and dimming schemes.

How about paying for access to each league in Starcraft? Customs? SDK? Replays? Account space subscription to maintain your profile? They might not go that far yet but the possibilities are endless as long as some consumers ruin it for others, in fact I think its more corrosive than piracy.

The last Activison game I got was COD4 as a gift but now they are merged with Blizzard it's harder. Even If you support blizzard but never buy Activision's cut scene packs they will never add back that value unless they think they are losing unit sales. We are screwed either way.