Okay, I'm in Australia so I can summarise.
- The Aus government promised a review of classification (finally) in March last year
- The Attorney General of South Australia, Micheal Atkinson, who previously had veto'd any discussion on an 18+ rating decided he wanted to "review" the discussion paper when it was ready for release last September. This is a man who has said many times he will not support an 18+ rating in Australia.
- The paper did not see daylight till April when it was finally released to the Minister for Home Affairs, Mr Brendan O'Connor (I only found out about this part the other day)
- SFA has continued to happen.
So if you are in Australia, want an 18+ rating for games, and are willing to send LOTS of letters to news agencies and everyone from your local member up to the Prime Minister then come join us on whirlpool (http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=1286583). I am trying for a two pronged attack to get the discussion paper released so we can finally have our review and get Micheal Atkinson taken out of the decision making process for abusing his power based to support his personal opinion which creates a conflict of interest.
- The Aus government promised a review of classification (finally) in March last year
- The Attorney General of South Australia, Micheal Atkinson, who previously had veto'd any discussion on an 18+ rating decided he wanted to "review" the discussion paper when it was ready for release last September. This is a man who has said many times he will not support an 18+ rating in Australia.
- The paper did not see daylight till April when it was finally released to the Minister for Home Affairs, Mr Brendan O'Connor (I only found out about this part the other day)
- SFA has continued to happen.
So if you are in Australia, want an 18+ rating for games, and are willing to send LOTS of letters to news agencies and everyone from your local member up to the Prime Minister then come join us on whirlpool (http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=1286583). I am trying for a two pronged attack to get the discussion paper released so we can finally have our review and get Micheal Atkinson taken out of the decision making process for abusing his power based to support his personal opinion which creates a conflict of interest.