First off, they are in response to different things.lacktheknack said:Quote two...emeraldrafael said:becuase it could work as future medicine. or seem plausible. whihc is what you said adding cnacer could be used as. and the point of it is its UNETHICAL!
Quote one...
call me scientific or close minded, but i will not accept an idea without good rational thought, reason, or cause for it to work. and niether will any other self respecting scientist.
...are unrelated and in the same post.
That said, how is killing cows/chimps any less ethical then refusing to find cures for deadly diseases?
And also, any self-respecting scientist is willing to take a plausible theory (talking about cancer cure here) and test it, and will have a better response to sillier suggestions then "NOOOOOOOOO TARD!" Which is EXACTLY how you responded to the OP.
Secondly, no, they wont forcibly inject cancer into someone. That is unethical and dangerous. You dont know anything about medicine appearanntly. Dont tell me about ethics, i'm going for double majoring in law and accounting, plus a minor in medical fields cuase i wanted to cover as many bases as possible and i have had to learn a set of ethics for each one.