Let's Talk About Marvel Comics And Spider Woman's Ass

RossaLincoln

New member
Feb 4, 2014
738
0
0
Let's Talk About Marvel Comics And Spider Woman's Ass

A rare instance in which both sides are right, the variant cover by Milo Manara is provocative and a provocation all at once.

Read Full Article
 

Sixcess

New member
Feb 27, 2010
2,719
0
0
I'd like to think that Marvel isn't so witless to tread the same path that DC did with the New 52. I don't see an issue with a sexy variant cover (within reason) and the main problem with DC hasn't been the covers, but what's inside, as the New 52 has become synonymous with the sexing up and dumbing down of multiple female characters, from Catwoman and Starfire to Harley Quinn and Amanda Waller.

So yeah - sexy variant cover by an interesting artist, I can live with that, so long as what's inside doesn't come across as having been written and drawn, one handed, by a sexually frustrated teenage boy.
 

RossaLincoln

New member
Feb 4, 2014
738
0
0
It really is a shame. It's gotten to the point that any sex in comics is associated with low-brow pandering to the male gaze. Usually because it is. The bigwigs at the comics industry seriously need to put on the brakes and reevaluate what decade this is. They keep saying how important their female audience is, yet when the solutions to the problem of maintaining them are clear and easy to remedy, they balk because they fear any kind of change. I just imagine a bunch of old dudes in suits cowering at the thought of not "staying the course".
 

The Rogue Wolf

Stealthy Carnivore
Legacy
Apr 3, 2020
11,597
1,059
118
Stalking the Digital Tundra
Gender
✅
Wow. That doesn't look so much like "butt cleavage" as it does "had her coccyx surgically removed". I mean seriously, it's borderline uncanny valley.

A lot of these artists need some female input; it'd be nice to see some "powerful sexy" rather than "submissive sexy".
 

Redd the Sock

New member
Apr 14, 2010
1,088
0
0
Mcoffey said:
It really is a shame. It's gotten to the point that any sex in comics is associated with low-brow pandering to the male gaze. Usually because it is. The bigwigs at the comics industry seriously need to put on the brakes and reevaluate what decade this is. They keep saying how important their female audience is, yet when the solutions to the problem of maintaining them are clear and easy to remedy, they balk because they fear any kind of change. I just imagine a bunch of old dudes in suits cowering at the thought of not "staying the course".
You see here's the problem. It goes both ways.

People use covers like these which are limited and unseen by most to stereotype the industry and end up not showing up. Marvel tries, but the books underperform, in many cases badly. With the July sales up, let's see how the books with female leads sell (We'll stick to Marvel)

Highest ranking is Storm #1 placing 46th (since it's a #1, expect that to drop next month

after that

#86 Ms Marvel
#121 Black Widow
#126 Captain Marvel
#127 She Hulk
#152 Elektra

Yeah, it's only 6 titles, but when you see where they place (all but one in cancellation risk high territory), it's not hard to see Marvel rationalizing female leads don't sell well because, really, they don't seem to. Joe Quesada once said in response to why he kept writer Chuck Austin around despite how much he was hated (guy had women issues second to Frank Miller) he replied that if he ran his business by the internet, he'd be out of business. AKA yeah you *****, but it's what you buy, and I doubt his opinion changed much in 10 years.

The market will change when the demand shows it can sustain itself in that change, and that isn't helped by acting like cheesecake is all Marvel (or any other company) knows. This applies to DC too. All the crap about what they got wrong, yet no appreciation for that Power Girl/ Huntress book.
 

Baresark

New member
Dec 19, 2010
3,908
0
0
Eh, this has basically been covered in previous social justice warrior columns. It doesn't hurt anyone to have a variant cover like that. You don't have to not buy the book to avoid it, you simply buy one of the alternate covers. I find complaints about this kind of thing to be ridiculous. I don't know what the fascination with this kind of thing is for people like the social justice warriors of the world. There are actual naked people on the covers of magazines that exist to objectify women, but lets complain about comicbook covers.

While I don't have any strong feelings either way for the review of that Teen Titans cover done by Janelle Asselin, I do question her choice of complaints. That cover is tame compared to just about every single issue of comics like Witchblade (or any image comic with females from it's inception). I don't find her idea about what does and does not make for good art compelling in reference to the what she is actually criticizing. Also, she noticeably speaks for every woman when she says no one with large breast would ever where what I'm assuming is meant to be a "strapless" top. Only, that is not the truth. I see large breasted women wearing strapless tops pretty regularly (weather permitting of course). It all depends on the style of the time more so than the want or need to see breasts. I routinely see this without any kind of breast support as well. I don't think they look like they are about to burst out either. If anything, the artistic reference was probably someone wearing a sports bra, which is what that looks like.

This is my one complaint about comics being mainstream. No one who actually reads comics really cares about the cover. It's there basically to let you know what you are picking up at a glance. I've seen few covers really show off anything about the contents of the issue, so it feels like an invented complaint when it's brought to bare against he Teen Titans cover.

I have just about had it with the Red Herring that is some jackasses actually threatened her with rape. It's terrible that it happened, but that doesn't actually have anything to do with her review, more about a few individuals fear of what they think she is capable of (ie. destroying their precious comic industry). No one is going to sit here and defend that attitude or justify it happening. But it's not really the issue we are talking about here and all it does is emotionally push you towards the conclusion of the author without offering you any empirical data.

You don't have to sit there and stare at it. Most covers are not eye catching (which is what I would say about that Spider Woman comic). That horrendous Catwoman cover is hard on the eyes, no matter how much T&A may be present. I quite like the Teen Titans cover because the work itself is extremely solid, though it makes it feel like perhaps the team may revolve around Wonder Girl in that issue(didn't read that, perhaps she is extremely central to that issue). That is reinforced by that strap that comes from her and encircles the whole team.

I do notice, as an artist myself, that a great many comic artists have just about everyone in skin tight outfits. This is an artistic shortcut. You know your anatomy, and that is just about enough to be a proficient character artist for comics. I mean, comics are the hardest commercial artistic endeavor to enter into these days, so that is no small feat. You don't see too many artists that add sufficient texture to their work for it to be really good (there is lots of texture on the Teen Titans cover). The Spider Woman cover is less so.

But, I do recognize that this column exists to point out things like this, so I do always appreciate that. If anything, as I have stated before, it makes me think about how I feel when I approach things. I have tried seeing it from the perspective that the author seems to take (ie. things like this are little more the sexploitation of women to attract men). Girls in comics are intentionally sexy, as are the men. Few people walking the earth fit the ideals laid down by comic figures, regardless of the sex involved. Comics are full of ideals. The heroes are powerful who use their abilities for good. Part of the ideal is huge chests and arms on men, powerful women of varying chest size who are as good as any man (if not better in many cases) and have petite little wastes and are too busy fighting evil to worry about what anyone actually thinks of them.
 

Ruisu

Enjoy the Silence
Jul 11, 2013
190
0
0
Hm. Sincerely, I actually didn't notice Wonder Girl's "huge breasts" until you pointed them out. The first thing that jumped my eyes was how pleasant the whole art (DAT HAIR) was to my eyes. Maybe I'm too used to big boobs from manga and anime, but it really didn't stand out as much as the whole picture.

Who is this artist by the way? I think I'm love with that cover.
 

Sniper Team 4

New member
Apr 28, 2010
5,433
0
0
Ruisu said:
Hm. Sincerely, I actually didn't notice Wonder Girl's "huge breasts" until you pointed them out. The first thing that jumped my eyes was how pleasant the whole art (DAT HAIR) was to my eyes. Maybe I'm too used to big boobs from manga and anime, but it really didn't stand out as much as the whole picture.

Who is this artist by the way? I think I'm love with that cover.
I wouldn't have noticed them if I hadn't read the article and knew what to look for. Like you, I think I've spent too much time in manga and anime.
You know what I see when I see that cover? Raven. Because I love Raven. Raven is awesome. Not too sure about her new appearance though...
 

Darth_Payn

New member
Aug 5, 2009
2,868
0
0
Sniper Team 4 said:
Ruisu said:
Hm. Sincerely, I actually didn't notice Wonder Girl's "huge breasts" until you pointed them out. The first thing that jumped my eyes was how pleasant the whole art (DAT HAIR) was to my eyes. Maybe I'm too used to big boobs from manga and anime, but it really didn't stand out as much as the whole picture.

Who is this artist by the way? I think I'm love with that cover.
I wouldn't have noticed them if I hadn't read the article and knew what to look for. Like you, I think I've spent too much time in manga and anime.
You know what I see when I see that cover? Raven. Because I love Raven. Raven is awesome. Not too sure about her new appearance though...
That cover's by Kenneth Roccafort, the guy to either thank (or blame) for how Starfire is dressed now (barely) in Red Hood and the Outlaws.
Not that I'm complaining; she comes from a different planet and culture and has a different set of values and attitudes about sex and relationships.
 

bjj hero

New member
Feb 4, 2009
3,180
0
0
The thing I first noticed was Jessicas (this is Jessica Drew Spiderwoman?) Hands. They are beautiful. Then I got the butt.

The cover is a publicity stunt plain and simple. Cat Woman waa jus horrible. I didnt lime the composition on the TT cover.
 

mistwolf

New member
Feb 1, 2008
122
0
0
I'm not against sexually charged variant covers in any way, but I can't seem to find the sexy in this one. People really look at that and think 'I'd tap that'? She barely looks human, let alone sexy. And that's my biggest problem with such covers: The female form is sexy, why are you mangling it? It just looks... Broken, at worst. Uncomfortable, at best. Why?
 

Neon Jackal

New member
Sep 10, 2009
44
0
0
The cover is nowhere near as bad as the interior art by Greg Land is going to be. Porn tracing, here we come!
 

faefrost

New member
Jun 2, 2010
1,280
0
0
Neon Jackal said:
The cover is nowhere near as bad as the interior art by Greg Land is going to be. Porn tracing, here we come!
Ok, good. I am glad I am not the only one wondering about that? I mean I don't think I have ever seen a woman drawn by Greg Land that isn't doing the stripper / porn star "O" face. It's kind of creepy. His "pole dancer" interpretations of some of the X-Mens younger teenaged characters has always struck me as in poor taste.

And it's not so much that the covers are "sexy". Most of the women that I know that read comics actually kind of like comic covers with a sort of classic pinup style. My wife always likes some of Greg Horns stuff. She seems to be ok with sexy so long as it isn't too over the top with grossly unrealistic anatomy and posing. And faces, facial expressions and eyes count for a lot with her. She actually likes the slightly sexy pinup style covers far more than more classic action covers which don't grab her attention.
 

RossaLincoln

New member
Feb 4, 2014
738
0
0
No issues with sexy covers or the likes. I only have issues if it looks like the anatomy got completely and utterly butchered(stylization will also impact what I think about it) like that catwoman cover. Can't say I much liked that spiderwoman cover however. The anatomy just seems to be a bit off to me, but I haven't seen what else the guy has made so I can't comment on the artist himself.

Though some art used for comicbooks makes me wonder why these artists haven't started making porn comics given they look like thats what they want to do sometimes.
 

BX3

New member
Mar 7, 2011
659
0
0
That wasn't the conversation about Spider Woman's butt I was hoping for.... =(
Also, that cover looks incredibly strange. Like, to the point of almost being kinda creepy.

Ruisu said:
Hm. Sincerely, I actually didn't notice Wonder Girl's "huge breasts" until you pointed them out. The first thing that jumped my eyes was how pleasant the whole art (DAT HAIR) was to my eyes. Maybe I'm too used to big boobs from manga and anime, but it really didn't stand out as much as the whole picture.

Who is this artist by the way? I think I'm love with that cover.
First thing I noticed was Beast Boy. I don't read American comics and am only really familiar with Teen Titans via the TV show, so I gotta ask: has Beasty always been such a... stud...? Makes me feel things a straight man ought not feel.

Anyway, yeah. For as admittedly unfocused as it is (As Janelle Asselin pointed out), the aesthetic of that cover sure does look nice. Something about it... maybe the use of color?
 

RA92

New member
Jan 1, 2011
3,079
0
0
The author got a warning for a low content post!

<youtube=rX7wtNOkuHo>
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,847
0
0
mistwolf said:
I'm not against sexually charged variant covers in any way, but I can't seem to find the sexy in this one. People really look at that and think 'I'd tap that'? She barely looks human, let alone sexy. And that's my biggest problem with such covers: The female form is sexy, why are you mangling it? It just looks... Broken, at worst. Uncomfortable, at best. Why?
mabye its a look into the difference between the male and female mind....because this just looks weird to me

for me "actual" sexyness requires the person to actually look and emote like a person
 

jurnag12

New member
Nov 9, 2009
460
0
0
Maybe it's just me, but I think that going by the general awfulness of some of these covers, the Spier Woman one really isn't half-bad. I mean, instead of needing to twist a character's spine into non-euclidean geometry, the effect is done with a camera angle and the situation itself just makes it looks like she's crawling over a roof.
 

ryukage_sama

New member
Mar 12, 2009
508
0
0
It's good to compare other comic covers to Manara's, but it was the content of DC's new 52 that offended so many readers. The first issue cover of "Red Hood and the Outlaws" wasn't offensive, but the content, the portrayal of Starfire as a woman who would have sex with men at the drop of a hat, drew ire from many in the community. To me, a mere cover, especially a variant cover, is of much less significance than the content. If Spider Woman was depicted in something other than her normal outfit, I'd could better understand the controversy.

Of course people don't have to like the cover, and can buy whatever variant he/she feels is the best representation of Spider-Woman.