The Salvation Army doesn't "get things done", a lot of their money goes to conservative, anti-gay, anti-abortion propaganda.pirateninj4 said:At least I know Sally Army get's shit done for poor people.
And my are you quite provably wrong; I'd ridicule you, but someone who's going to make a sweeping generalization like that about a group (to which iBelong) simply isn't going to care.Grey_Wolf_Leader said:Christians have never argued that anyone with homosexual inclinations do not have the same rights as anyone else.
Holy shit do you appear to be a really angry person. How does "they do a lot of good!" translate into "BUT THEY'RE FUCKING NAZIS, MAN!" to you?Blablahb said:I never donated to them anyway. Anyone with a different agenda, conversion in their case, is just not a charity.
Also note how their spokesperson doesn't even bother to deny their bigoted views, but instead tries to hide by saying they a happy few that do comply by the standards of being Arya... -oh wait, different bigots - people that do comply with the standards of a 'good Christian'. (as if anyone knows what those are)
So let's recognize the KKK as a charity eh?ffs-dontcare said:Even if they did discriminate, at least SOME people would still be receiving help.
And why not label the Taliban a charity while we're at it? After all if you're a devout Muslim extremist, they can give you a lot of aid.
Yes, and the nazis helped Germany out of a deep economic crisis, so they were also good guys? Give me a break.Fawxy said:I'm thinking the Salvation Army does a LOT more good than bad.
Fleischer said:Way to go, Salvation Army! You just steeled me to merrily walk past you bell ringers without giving a donation. In the same way I refuse to support the bigoted Boy Scouts of America, I shall give the Salvation Army the same treatment. The money I would've given to Salvation Army will go to Child's Play.
Someone didn't read the article, nor any of the comments apparently.Gmans uncle said:I'm the "B" part of LGBT, and this is news to me.
If I lived anywhere near any branch of the Salvation army i would never donate there again, however I live in Utah, where the organization does not exist, so I really don't have anything to say except this,
Salvation Army...
...really? You've never noticed the Santas ringing their bells outside of the grocery stores? Hell, they have locations in both Salt Lake and Ogden.Gmans uncle said:I'm the "B" part of LGBT, and this is news to me.
If I lived anywhere near any branch of the Salvation army i would never donate there again, however I live in Utah, where the organization does not exist, so I really don't have anything to say except this,
Salvation Army...
Actually there is debate as to whether the concept of "human rights" is a universal idea or a Western idea. I realize its wikipedia (and that is looked down upon) but take a look at this:NameIsRobertPaulson said:There is a very large difference between "Opinion of Rights" and "Denial of Rights".Volf99 said:snip.NameIsRobertPaulson said:snipomicron1 said:snipGlerken said:I'm not reinterpreting any rights.
A bigot is someone who is intolerant towards other groups of people.
Saying a certain group of people shouldn't have the same rights as yours is being bigoted.
The freedom of speech is for all of humanity. Just because the government says its right does not make it so. If the government said tomorrow that the murder of Asian-Americans was legal, it would not make it right.
All humans have rights, as long as those rights to do not cause harm, or infringe upon the rights, of others. The right to marry is another such right.
zuh?LetalisK said:...really? You've never noticed the Santas ringing their bells outside of the grocery stores? Hell, they have locations in both Salt Lake in Ogden.Gmans uncle said:I'm the "B" part of LGBT, and this is news to me.
If I lived anywhere near any branch of the Salvation army i would never donate there again, however I live in Utah, where the organization does not exist, so I really don't have anything to say except this,
Salvation Army...
Last time i read the sign right next to the kettle by the Santa it stated "All Proceeds go to "Rubashov said:But is it? How do you know how the SA uses the money that goes into those kettles? It's a fact that the SA lobbies for anti-gay legislation, and that money has to come from somewhere. Even if it doesn't come directly from donations, it's still money that the SA somehow has in its possession and, therefore, money that could have been used to, y'know, feed people.direkiller said:OT: the money going into those kettles is for the food bank not anything the Salvation army agrees with
If I'm going to donate to a charity, I want to know that my money isn't contributing to that charity's efforts to lobby for discriminatory legislation.
Therese a differences between disagreeing with someone and actively trying to suppress someone.SilentCom said:The LGBT community is offended because some people don't agree with their choices? I mean people will disagree with each other on almost anything and this is just one such example. The Salvation Army isn't trying to hunt down homosexual people so why would the LGBT community be attacking their charities that are directed toward everyone. It's going to harm more than just the Salvation Army seeing that the charities don't go to them but everyone else.
Christianity IS inherently bigoted. Core values of the christian religion are based on racism, sexism, religious persecution and homophobia. It's great when people choose to take the good (love, hope, forgiveness) from the Bible and ignore the bad (racism, sexism, violence), but I think we all know that is not the majority position.viranimus said:and the assumption that Christianity is inherently bigoted.
Yes, but unfortunately it can go both ways. Because the SA is seen as suppressing LGBT, the LFBT community is trying to suppress them back. The problem is that it harms the charities they do which means it ultimately harms the people who are helped by the charities and not so much the SA itself. I mean people are free to choose to donate or not to the SA because their money goes to charity not into the pockets of the SA, or at least it shouldn't.direkiller said:Therese a differences between disagreeing with someone and actively trying to suppress someone.SilentCom said:The LGBT community is offended because some people don't agree with their choices? I mean people will disagree with each other on almost anything and this is just one such example. The Salvation Army isn't trying to hunt down homosexual people so why would the LGBT community be attacking their charities that are directed toward everyone. It's going to harm more than just the Salvation Army seeing that the charities don't go to them but everyone else.
(and yes there lobbyist are part of the anti-gay movement)