In Search of Username said:
Surely the zone is just supposed to describe a situation in which one person just wants to be friends and the other wants a relationship.
I genuinely don't understand when people say the friendzone is a misogynistic idea. Like, I hate misogyny, but when I see someone talking about being friendzoned I do not see someone who hates women, I see someone who is sad to have been rejected, and I feel sorry for them. Someone explain this to me better than that dickish article at the top did?
Yeah, but that's not how it's phrased, is it.
Ok, for simplicity, we will go with person A being the one who wants a relationship and person B being the one who doesn't.
It's phrased as `Person B put me in the friend-zone!`.
But they didn't.
Person B has being going on their merry way assuming they were friends, and found out that the friendship was a way for person A to try and get invited to person B's pants-party.
When person B responds that they do not want a sexual relationship with A, they are not putting them anywhere. They are rejecting them.
It's like if you and I were having chocolate and you also wanted to split a portion of grapes.
You say `do you want some grapes?`
and I'm all `no`.
I haven't put you in the chocolate-zone.
I have just denied an advancement on the snacktimes.
I dont like grapes.