Look Svelte in Videos with One Easy Click

Greg Tito

PR for Dungeons & Dragons
Sep 29, 2005
12,070
0
0
Look Svelte in Videos with One Easy Click

A German coder has produced a program that can easily remove unwanted pounds from anyone appearing in videos.

In the past, adding weight or changing a body's build in video needed intensive frame by frame alterations by a team of dedicated CG artists. But now, a new tool can do that task quickly and cheaply by automating some of the process. The team led by Christian Theobalt of the Max Planck Institute for Informatics in Saarbrücken, Germany, accomplished this by taking 3D scans of 120 different body types of both men and women. This gave them a library of shapes to impose over a moving image, which can quickly be altered after the actor's silhouette is traced with other consumer grade software.


The practical upshots of tech like this are numerous. First off, an actor wouldn't have to physically lose or gain weight like Christian Bale did in The Machinist or Robert de Niro famously did for Raging Bull.

"The actor wouldn't need to go to all that trouble," Theobalt said.

Also, ads wouldn't need to be shot differently to appeal to different cultures by using skinnier or fatter spokespeople. They could just shoot one and make the changes cheaply and easily with this software.

The program doesn't yet have a catchy Web 2.0 name yet but I'm sure it's just a matter of time. NoFats? Skinjob? No I got it: SlimFast!

What? That's taken? Sheesh, well, what's your bright idea then?

Source: New Scientist [http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn19550-you-too-can-have-a-dream-body--in-your-movies.html]

Permalink
 

shadow946

New member
Jul 22, 2009
31
0
0
This upsets me greatly. Film making isn't about what a computer can do. How awesome was it when all the actors in 300 underwent vigorous training? If you want a fat actor, get a fat actor; if you want a buff actor, get a buff actor.
 

Jaebird

New member
Aug 19, 2008
1,298
0
0
This just adds to the "Why do we need actors when you can use CGI?" argument.
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
I don't think it will catch on all that well to be honest. I remember back after "The Crow" came out how they were talking about actors being replaced witn "Synthespians" (purely computer generated actors) and there was some talk of the first Star Wars Prequel using a CGI created young Alec Guiness based on his body of other work, needless to say it didn't happen.

This is a program that makes "shopping" video rather easy, but it doesn't do anything that wasn't already possible, and if there was going to be a demand for this people would already have been doing it the expensive way, which we so far have not been seeing.
 

SeanTheSheep

New member
Jun 23, 2009
10,508
0
0
"Christian bale" What happened to the capital 'B'?

OT: Looks interesting, but potentially another thing for anti-CGI people to complain about.
 

sheic99

New member
Oct 15, 2008
2,316
0
0
Just another reason to not trust the "Before" and "After" shots in infomercials.
 

SpaceSpork

New member
May 15, 2009
2,409
0
0
Now, I'm sure that this article is really interesting, but while reading it, all I could think about was how awesome the word svelte is. Ssssssvelte. Svvvvvvvelte. Suh-velt!
 

deth2munkies

New member
Jan 28, 2009
1,066
0
0
I was like LOLWUT because my name in games that don't allow numbers (including SC2) is often Svelte <_<
 

thublihnk

New member
Jul 24, 2009
395
0
0
I'm insanely impressed by the tech demo in the video, but I'd have to get my hands on the actual software before I'm convinced. Boy, if this shit works... I can stop dieting.
 

ArcanaJ

New member
Sep 14, 2010
12
0
0
"...ads wouldn't need to be shot differently to appeal to different cultures by using skinnier or fatter spokespeople. They could just shoot one and make the changes..."

Oh, I can't see THAT going horribly wrong.
 

ddq5

I wonder what the character limi
Jun 18, 2009
415
0
0
This is wrong on so many levels. I hate computers, in the context of film-making, that is. I want you to keep your goddamn computers out of my goddamn films! What's next? Audio software that automatically pitches dialog so that the actors don't have to give a good delivery? Taking the spirit out of film-making, I say.
 

Wolfram23

New member
Mar 23, 2004
4,095
0
0
Pretty crazy!! Except now I really can't trust anything I see. Before it was (mostly) just photos...
 

Adzma

New member
Sep 20, 2009
1,287
0
0
ddq5 said:
This is wrong on so many levels. I hate computers, in the context of film-making, that is. I want you to keep your goddamn computers out of my goddamn films! What's next? Audio software that automatically pitches dialog so that the actors don't have to give a good delivery? Taking the spirit out of film-making, I say.
Amen. Did a great man not once say that Special effects are merely tools? A means to tell a story?

Oh wait, that was George Lucas... >_>
 

Brotherofwill

New member
Jan 25, 2009
2,566
0
0
ddq5 said:
This is wrong on so many levels. I hate computers, in the context of film-making, that is. I want you to keep your goddamn computers out of my goddamn films! What's next? Audio software that automatically pitches dialog so that the actors don't
have to give a good delivery? Taking the spirit out of film-making, I say.
Amen! I want my fat Robert De Niro, thank you very much CGI. Doing it the 'real' way (including puppetry) will always be better.
 

Vault Citizen

New member
May 8, 2008
1,703
0
0
I'm not sure if its true but I think I remember reading that Christian Bale chose to lose as much weight as he did, that they were willing to use cgi to alter his appearence.

I'm not sure whether or not some method actors will go for this.
 

Mechsoap

New member
Apr 4, 2010
2,129
0
0
this reminds me off that most people rather want to look good then looking real, rather have their noses replaced if its a bit curved, i think its stupid thing though