I think it looks more like a case of "I'll just ignore counterpoints I can't refute".CriticKitten said:When I said I was done discussing it, that didn't mean "I'll happily restart that multi-page argument with you here in this thread, because I love wasting my time repeating myself". It meant "if you try to argue with me about it again, I'll just ignore you and go about my business as if you never existed".
Maybe people would be more accepting of your opinions if you weren't so passive-aggressive and condescending when giving them?CriticKitten said:It makes me respect speedrunning and its community less and less each time it happens, too. I didn't say that the speedrun is meaningless, I just said that I don't consider it "beating the game" in any traditional sense. Apparently, however, this is offensive to them in some way and they will shout down anyone who dares suggest as much....and I don't know why they find this opinion offensive, nor do I particularly care. I'm not obligated to accept their point of view any more than they have to accept mine.
Then why did you bring it up again in THIS thread?CriticKitten said:I saw the same defenses and explanations rehashed enough times that I'm genuinely just sick of the discussion entirely, and don't really want to talk about it any more because it'll just lead to more of the exact same statements repeated ad infinitum.
That doesn't seem like something someone would do if they're "sick of the discussion".
[Citation Needed]CriticKitten said:the Escapist used a definition of "beating the game" that is generally not shared by the core audience of gaming, or at the very least, is typically not a viewpoint that most blokes not directly invested into speedrunning would agree with.