They've fucked up really, really badly. Having the presiding judge reverse their own decision(s) on what grounds they'll allow the defence to base their case on is the judicial equivalent of being cockslapped. In public. With a whale's cock.JDKJ said:Doesn't look like the prosecution's off to the best possible start:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/12/judge-in-xbox-modding-trial-berates-prosecution-halts-trial.ars
The worst part for the prosecution -- and certainly the part I find most amusing -- may be that the Judge looks prepared to allow the defense to go to town on the fact that the prosecution's illegal console-modding expert is in fact an illegal console-modder himself. Witnesses in a criminal prosecution that have a criminal history of their own usually don't make good witnesses.RhombusHatesYou said:They've fucked up really, really badly. Having the presiding judge reverse their own decision(s) on what grounds they'll allow the defence to base their case on is the judicial equivalent of being cockslapped. In public. With a whale's cock.JDKJ said:Doesn't look like the prosecution's off to the best possible start:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/12/judge-in-xbox-modding-trial-berates-prosecution-halts-trial.ars
That would be true if he wasn't charging a fee for it sadly...mindlesspuppet said:This shouldn't even be a case, he bought the system, he's allowed to do what he wants with it. So are the people he enabled to do the same. There are plenty of legit reasons someone would want to mod a 360.
The Warden ends up running a console modding service.teknoarcanist said:Maybe it'll go all Shawshank and he'll help the warden pirate Microsoft Office programs :O
"The funny thing is...on the outside, I was a total n00b. I had to go to jail to become l33t h4XX0rz."RhombusHatesYou said:The Warden ends up running a console modding service.teknoarcanist said:Maybe it'll go all Shawshank and he'll help the warden pirate Microsoft Office programs :O
I'm not sure why the OP's article places emphasis of the FBI agent's involvement, but it appears that most of the heavy lifting was actually done by an undercover agent for the Entertainment Software Association.Imat said:The only problem I see with this whole thing is the undercover FBI agent devoted to the cracking of this case.
If he modded many, many 360s, like the article implies, than the sentence for modding 1 360 would be increased to suit the crime (to a point). 10 years may seem like a long time, but if he modded thousands of the things I gotta say he kinda deserves it.
And there's no way he has a case in the "I didn't know they were gonna pirate games with it" department. Clearly some of them were, and unless he has a written agreement with each customer with their signature saying they won't use it for illegal purposes at all, he's got nothing to stand on. Ignorance does not an innocent man make.
But to dedicate an actual FBI agent to the case is ridiculous. There are so many better uses for our federal level policemen, none of which include going undercover to expose xbox 360 modding rings.
Are you both aware that there's little to no possibility that this first-time offender will actually spend a day in a federal prison? Ten years is the maximum custodial sentence allowed by law. This kid's not gonna get a ten-year sentence if convicted on all charges. More like a year or two of probation. He's a young, middle-class, white kid caught modding consoles. Not a young, lower-class, black kid caught selling crack.stinkychops said:He didn't steal anything. He allowed people to gain the ability to run software from other 'production teams' who stole from Microsoft. There are legitimate applications of modding. What do you think should be the arbitrary sentencing of a murderer?bahumat42 said:i jay walk all the time we don't get arrested for that herestinkychops said:A bit hard?bahumat42 said:not only that he has made money off of breaking their system, thats all kinds of wrong. Now ten years is a bit harsh but it will scare off modders a bit.jumjalalabash said:And he doesn't have any. He is doing it to let people pirate games.mindlesspuppet said:This shouldn't even be a case, he bought the hardware, he's allowed to do what he wants with it. So are the people he enabled to do the same. There are plenty of legit reasons someone would want to mod a 360.
Have you ever jay-walked? What kind of sentence do you think you deserve for that?
He didn't directly hurt anyone. He was supported by consumers. This is a copyright law case. How can anyone really be such a lapdog as to put this man's entire life going down the drain over a few lost dollars to a huge corporation as 'a bit harsh'.
but yes its totally fine to prosecute him for being a thieving bastard. He is allowing people to bypass the purchase of videogames losing money for the production teams. And getting paid for it. Let him rot i say.
Breaking fucking region locks, for one.stinkychops said:There are legitimate applications of modding.
That's because the system is designed to protect the rich and powerful individuals and corporations. It's all about them.Arkhangelsk said:He gets 10 years, and rapists and dog killers get 5 years? The juridical system is fucked.
You didn't miss much in the OP. Doesn't really give much details. Which is another thing, not much is revealed about this case. He could have encouraged pirating, or he might not have. We just don't know. There's probably details we don't know about.Kurokami said:Yes, but I don't think that's something that they can hold him for in court. If they find pirated games on his system, or that he really encourages it or w/e than yeah, you've got something to stand on, but otherwise this seems alot like locking a guy up for offering to overclock a persons graphics card (or whatever its called). Might help people to play pirated games, and surely he's enabling them, but in both cases I think they've got sufficiant deniability. (I realize the example is a bit rediculous, as you're right that most people will surely mod their Xbox for the sole purpose of playing pirated games, but is it really enough to go on to convict him of a crime?)Irridium said:Yes, but these modifications allow people to play pirated games. Which is probably what the lawsuit is all about. And chances are, more then a few asked for the modifications for that reason. He can say that the people asking for modifications said they wouldn't play pirated games, but chances are they were simply lying.mindlesspuppet said:This shouldn't even be a case, he bought the system, he's allowed to do what he wants with it. So are the people he enabled to do the same. There are plenty of legit reasons someone would want to mod a 360.
By the way, I didn't read much of the OP, so if I missed anything feel free to point out. (tired and off to sleep! =])
I have a feeling that the folks down at the car park where this kid's employed won't care too much if he picks up a stretch on probation.stinkychops said:A two year probation would be fairer, but the fact that this could probably stop him being gainfully empolyed sickens me.JDKJ said:Are you both aware that there's little to no possibility that this first-time offender will actually spend a day in a federal prison? Ten years is the maximum custodial sentence allowed by law. This kid's not gonna get a ten-year sentence if convicted on all charges. More like a year or two of probation. He's a young, middle-class, white kid caught modding consoles. Not a young, lower-class, black kid caught selling crack.stinkychops said:He didn't steal anything. He allowed people to gain the ability to run software from other 'production teams' who stole from Microsoft. There are legitimate applications of modding. What do you think should be the arbitrary sentencing of a murderer?bahumat42 said:i jay walk all the time we don't get arrested for that herestinkychops said:A bit hard?bahumat42 said:not only that he has made money off of breaking their system, thats all kinds of wrong. Now ten years is a bit harsh but it will scare off modders a bit.jumjalalabash said:And he doesn't have any. He is doing it to let people pirate games.mindlesspuppet said:This shouldn't even be a case, he bought the hardware, he's allowed to do what he wants with it. So are the people he enabled to do the same. There are plenty of legit reasons someone would want to mod a 360.
Have you ever jay-walked? What kind of sentence do you think you deserve for that?
He didn't directly hurt anyone. He was supported by consumers. This is a copyright law case. How can anyone really be such a lapdog as to put this man's entire life going down the drain over a few lost dollars to a huge corporation as 'a bit harsh'.
but yes its totally fine to prosecute him for being a thieving bastard. He is allowing people to bypass the purchase of videogames losing money for the production teams. And getting paid for it. Let him rot i say.