Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. Review - Episode 12: Seeds

medv4380

The Crazy One
Feb 26, 2010
669
0
21
Kumagawa Misogi said:
Final ratings out and AoS sees another drop to the new second lowest viewership of 6.37 million. If after a 2 week break it sees another drop I wonder if it could drop below 5 million by series end?

episode/viewers in millions
01 - 12.12 ( pilot )
02 - 8.66
03 - 7.87
04 - 7.85
05 - 7.39
06 - 7.15
07 - 6.67
08 - 6.89
09 - 9.69 ( advertised as set after Thor: The Dark World )
10 - 6.11 ( fall season cliff hanger )
11 - 6.63 ( new year start )
12 - 6.37

12 episodes in and it hasn't stabilised yet.
It's cute how people are duped into thinking that those are still valid numbers. The reason for the numbers being where they are is the target demographic happens to be tech aware youth. When you look at the Live +7 Days to include DVR, and Hulu viewing it shoots up to the top in the ratings. The performance of Shield is the reason why they're trying out a Netflix Only series, but I get it. Live gives an immediately reportable number. No reporter wants to wait a week just to get the actual final number to report. The Stability of "live" is in question, but who cares when the number are stable in the Live+7. By then it's old news, and they want the viewership of the next episode, and no one cares that the Live only are about 70% off from the Live+7 a week after the fact. Except Disney who doesn't care when you watched it just that you watched it.
 

Quiotu

New member
Mar 7, 2008
426
0
0
Diddy_Mao said:
Agents of Shield is a decent enough show, hurt largely I think by not being as large scale as the cinematic counterpart.
It's a fun show and worth watching, but I'm not going to pretend it's the next "must watch" anything.

That being said, they need to start wrapping up some loose threads PDQ. Shows like X-Files and Lost soured a lot of folks on the never ending mystery and I think Agents of Shield would do well to put a few more of it's cards on the table.
I think the show could learn a thing or two from Chuck, one of the last shows on syndicated TV I really enjoyed. Each season needs an arc, something you build up towards, you have a climactic couple episodes to work it out, then a denouement for the season along with a stinger for the arc of the next season. Also, Chuck was very good at changing the structure of the characters enough that from season to season, the interaction would never be the same. In fact if they play it right, Skye could very easily be the Chuck of AoS, going from the geeky hacker trying to fit in to the pseudo-leader with the most power to wield.

Just my take on it... I see a lot of similarities between the two shows, and how well it works depends greatly on how they end the season.
 

Quiotu

New member
Mar 7, 2008
426
0
0
Kumagawa Misogi said:
ABC only cares about the live showing as those who pay ABC to place their adverts only care about live showing since DVR equal's skipped adverts.

Also the DVR ratings are dropping as episode 10 ( the most recent DVR available )has seen a 30% decrease from episode 2 ( I ignored the overinflated pilot to make it not look quite so extreme 46% if you want to know ).
AoS is up against NCIS, and it will never overtake that show. As long as AoS is in a comfortable second place, I doubt ABC will look into killing off the show. Currently it's beating any other show in the timeslot, including The Biggest Loser. Nowadays it means something when your regular program is beating the reality show.
 

medv4380

The Crazy One
Feb 26, 2010
669
0
21
Kumagawa Misogi said:
ABC only cares about the live showing as those who pay ABC to place their adverts only care about live showing since DVR equal's skipped adverts.

Also the DVR ratings are dropping as episode 10 ( the most recent DVR available )has seen a 30% decrease from episode 2 ( I ignored the overinflated pilot to make it not look quite so extreme 46% if you want to know ).
Only the local advertisers that ignore hulu care about that. ABC gets paid for the Hulu views, and even shares a portion with the local station. ABC even brands the local station logo onto every episode of shield to the best of the ability of Hulu to determine which station is your local station.

As for your logic of episode 10 has a significant ratings drop I counter with every series, even NCIS which is winning the time slot, had a bit of a drop because it's considered a normal seasonal drop. Why do you think they go on winter break? If you bothered to look at the increase between Live and Live+7 you'd see that your "drop" is most likely erased for Episode 11 and 12. But that would require accepting that Live+7 is about 66.3%(median) larger than live.

E1 - 17.01
E2 - 13.17
E3 - 12.01
E4 - 11.6
E5 - 11.16
E6 - 10.93
E7 - 10.13
E8 - 10.31
E9 - 12.75
E10 - 9.2

E11 Live 6.63 Estimate Live+7 11.0
E12 Live 6.37 Estimate Live+7 10.6

Using the Formula of
Live * 66.3% + Live = 'Live+7'
you get a fairly good estimate for all but 1,and 9. It even works for episode 10 which you are so bend out of shape about so I have no doubt that the's stable at around 10 - 11 million regular viewers.
 

EcnoTheNeato

New member
Mar 19, 2009
5
0
0
Johnny Novgorod said:
Makabriel said:
Johnny Novgorod said:
So the answer to Coulson's mysterious resurrection is... he got resurrected? That's it? How underwhelming.
And no I don't think there's any reason for it other than "audiences like the guy".
Yeah, it's actually a lot more complicated than that.
Surgeons revived him and planted false memories. How's that a complicated explanation?
Did...did you miss the part where he was dead for days and a strange machine was patching him up? Or how they constantly say that Nick Fury ordered it himself? Sounds not only mysterious but also complicated as hell...

Though maybe you meant to use another word like "lame" or "unimaginative"? I mean, that would make more sense since it sounds more opinion-based I suppose
 

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Apr 10, 2020
16,973
1,038
118
Country
Argentina
EcnoTheNeato said:
Johnny Novgorod said:
Makabriel said:
Johnny Novgorod said:
So the answer to Coulson's mysterious resurrection is... he got resurrected? That's it? How underwhelming.
And no I don't think there's any reason for it other than "audiences like the guy".
Yeah, it's actually a lot more complicated than that.
Surgeons revived him and planted false memories. How's that a complicated explanation?
Did...did you miss the part where he was dead for days and a strange machine was patching him up? Or how they constantly say that Nick Fury ordered it himself? Sounds not only mysterious but also complicated as hell...
It doesn't matter what technical mumbo jumbo they come up with, it's still surgery. They might as well just say SCIENCE from the get-go. And I maintain they resurrected him because it'd be easier to get an audience with this guy than someone new. No matter if they retcon him to be the savior of the universe.
 

Eldritch Warlord

New member
Jun 6, 2008
2,901
0
0
Spaceman Spiff said:
I started following it to keep up on all the happenings in the MCU, but was quickly dissatisfied with it after 3 episodes.
You might do well to give the show another chance, episode 4 is the first good one.

Kittyhawk said:
Go and see Netflix and do something totally new, Whedon. Who knows, you might get to a third season.
That's an odd thing to say. Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Angel both ran well over 3 seasons (7 and 5 respectively) and no Netflix original series has 3 seasons yet.
 

shintakie10

New member
Sep 3, 2008
1,342
0
0
EcnoTheNeato said:
Johnny Novgorod said:
Makabriel said:
Johnny Novgorod said:
So the answer to Coulson's mysterious resurrection is... he got resurrected? That's it? How underwhelming.
And no I don't think there's any reason for it other than "audiences like the guy".
Yeah, it's actually a lot more complicated than that.
Surgeons revived him and planted false memories. How's that a complicated explanation?
Did...did you miss the part where he was dead for days and a strange machine was patching him up? Or how they constantly say that Nick Fury ordered it himself? Sounds not only mysterious but also complicated as hell...

Though maybe you meant to use another word like "lame" or "unimaginative"? I mean, that would make more sense since it sounds more opinion-based I suppose
Given how incredibly dull the explanation for how he was revived was, I kinda doubt the explanation for why is any more intriguing. If the show was better I'd be a bit more optimistic, but its...well...not.

You can't play up somethin as this gigantic mystery for half a season then lowball it that badly and expect people to get hyped for the next big mystery.
 

Scars Unseen

^ ^ v v < > < > B A
May 7, 2009
3,028
0
0
I don't know about specific characters, but based on Whedon's past works, I'd imagine that Skye's abilities will likely include strength and ass-kicking. I'm also guessing that she'll end up having to face off with Mike Peterson from the pilot ep as well as other centipede soldiers.
 

TKretts3

New member
Jul 20, 2010
432
0
0
Johnny Novgorod said:
EcnoTheNeato said:
Johnny Novgorod said:
Makabriel said:
Johnny Novgorod said:
So the answer to Coulson's mysterious resurrection is... he got resurrected? That's it? How underwhelming.
And no I don't think there's any reason for it other than "audiences like the guy".
Yeah, it's actually a lot more complicated than that.
Surgeons revived him and planted false memories. How's that a complicated explanation?
Did...did you miss the part where he was dead for days and a strange machine was patching him up? Or how they constantly say that Nick Fury ordered it himself? Sounds not only mysterious but also complicated as hell...
It doesn't matter what technical mumbo jumbo they come up with, it's still surgery. They might as well just say SCIENCE from the get-go. And I maintain they resurrected him because it'd be easier to get an audience with this guy than someone new. No matter if they retcon him to be the savior of the universe.
Is 'sciencing his brain back from the dead' by surgery, really that different from 'sciencing his brain into an artificial body' by surgery? According to your logic, anyway. No matter what they did, it was always going to boil down to 'SCIENCE' or 'MAGIC', and most of the audience knew that. What we didn't know was just how, and much more importantly, why, it was done.
 

Crazy Zaul

New member
Oct 5, 2010
1,217
0
0
Well whoever Skye turns out to be it will probably be the most disappointing person possible.
 

JenSeven

Crazy person! Avoid!
Oct 19, 2010
695
0
0
To determine what Skye actually is, we need to first determine what she can't be.

A mutant.
Mutants are owned by 20th Century Fox, and I don't think they will allow Marvel to run that part of the business too.
Since we haven't seen or heard mention of mutants I think they are still off-limits for Marvel.

An Alien.
She had a physical when she came on board. You'd think they would notice. Unless she is the type of alien that is COMPLETELY identical to humans.
Or is Simmons is also part of the "protect Skye" movement, which would be idiotic.

Anything related to Spider-man.
Because you know, Sony owns that.


So, with mutant and alien out, what are we left with?
Time traveller? Something similar to X-23, but without the mutant connection? Genetic experiment?

No idea, to be honest.
The most interesting idea would be the X-23 treatment. A female clone of a powerful hero. Maybe a female Tony Stark or something, seeing her mechanical and computer abilities.
Taskmaster seems also to not be a stretch, she seems to pick up skills and abilities quickly.
Taskmaster is also one of the more notable and interesting Avengers enemy, and with a next few movies in the works, it seems to not be a bad idea to name-drop him.

EDIT:
Well, nevermind all that, figured it out.
What we should remind ourselves of is that this show is a commercial for the other Marvel franchises.
Skye is the female "companion" of a major villain that was already hinted at in the movies.
Probably on the run and in hiding on Earth. Erased her own mind probably to not give herself away.
She is also one of the major themes of the show, and we should remember the line that was said about her:
"Wherever she goes death follows."
She is Lady Death. Companion of Thanos.
We saw Thanos at the end of The Avengers.
He would also need a reason to go to earth. Besides the artefacts, that are in Thor's hands, who is also a protector of Earth.
Also, he smiled when they said "To challenge them is to court death", something that people who are familiar with Thanos know he does. They even have a "child" together, known as Rot.
 

SeeDarkly_Xero

New member
Jan 24, 2014
102
0
0
Seriously doubt Skye is going to end up being anything we'll recognize from the Marvel U up front.
Certainly nothing mainstream in its familiarity. I wouldn't be shocked if they re-write the origins of someone like Scorpion (Carmilla Black, aka Thasanee Rappaccini, daughter of AIM Scientist Supreme Monica Rappaccini,) to tie in to her character, but I doubt there will be ANY direct match to any character "as we know them."

(Although with all the emphasis on there being "no such thing" as telepathy, I would not be surprised if we find out THAT is her power set.)

Regarding Donnie Gill... his origins in the Marvel Universe have nothing to do with the Inhumans outside of very recent events where he was conveniently affected by terrigenesis to have the same powers his powersuit gave him.
Whether or not that makes him "technically Inhuman" is debatable.
I do love the creative re-imagining of Blizzard for AoS though.
I could be mistaken, but aren't filming rights to all things directly Inhuman tied up with the Fantastic Four license?
 

gamernerdtg2

New member
Jan 2, 2013
501
0
0
Who is the dude now being controlled by the clairvoyant? He was the first character with superpowers from episode one, and everything for him revolves around his son...why no mention of him in this review?
I hope I'm not getting my episodes mixed up...