As long as that plot hole godchild remains in the game I want nothing to do with EA or Bioware and any of their future games. Make that damn kid go away and then we'll talk. Otherwise I'm done!
He's trying to save you from synthetics, man.Adam Jensen said:As long as that plot hole godchild remains in the game I want nothing to do with EA or Bioware and any of their future games. Make that damn kid go away and then we'll talk. Otherwise I'm done!
thats not the point.SajuukKhar said:well first off I said BIG plot-holes, not plotholes in general. I suggest that next time you actually read someones post before yo respond to it.Asita said:snip
.
.
Secondly organics natural hatred and distrust of anything that isn't them makes lasting peace impossible. Your assumption that lasting peace would be equally as probably as total genocide would work only if we ignored the entirety of organic evolution and how the organic mind works.
so long as two distinct individuals exist they will compete against each other making long-term peace impossible.
The only way that lasting peace would be possible is if
1. We become a hive mind like ants, or close to like The Geth were before the upgrade in ME3, were everyone and everything, and I do mean EVERYTHING, was all part of the same collective mind, but not necessarily of the some collective body.
2. We somehow pull a Neon Genesis Evangelion and merge everything into one super body.
"what's even the point of complaining anymore?" so they fucking fix it!Unsilenced said:I don't think I ever really expected them to be, like, "OK that sucked here's a better one," so this is still pretty good news in my book. The ending was never going to suddenly become great with an edit. That just wasn't in the cards.
So we're stuck with Shepard just deciding that choice is overrated and bowing down to a glowly little brat, at least we can maybe get some decent explanation as to how the entire fleet isn't going to starve to death in space, or why all galactic civilization isn't completely fucked forever by the sudden termination of all interstellar trade.
Of course, it might just be total shit, in which case, what's even the point of complaining anymore?
Either way, at least they tried. I have to give them some credit for that.
If you read it right the context is that they want to JUSTIFY the endings and what not and give you answers to what you do afterwards, It's hardly even what we asked for and it's not a TRUE ending, So much for striking a good balance this is only gonna generate over 9000 more times flak towards bioware then before.Adam Jensen said:As long as that plot hole godchild remains in the game I want nothing to do with EA or Bioware and any of their future games. Make that damn kid go away and then we'll talk. Otherwise I'm done!
Good luck with that.Joseph Alexander said:"what's even the point of complaining anymore?" so they fucking fix it!Unsilenced said:I don't think I ever really expected them to be, like, "OK that sucked here's a better one," so this is still pretty good news in my book. The ending was never going to suddenly become great with an edit. That just wasn't in the cards.
So we're stuck with Shepard just deciding that choice is overrated and bowing down to a glowly little brat, at least we can maybe get some decent explanation as to how the entire fleet isn't going to starve to death in space, or why all galactic civilization isn't completely fucked forever by the sudden termination of all interstellar trade.
Of course, it might just be total shit, in which case, what's even the point of complaining anymore?
Either way, at least they tried. I have to give them some credit for that.
And again, nothing about the peace between The Geth and Quarrians gives any sort of evidence to support that it would last.Joseph Alexander said:thats not the point.
the point is a lasting peace between organics and synthetics, which the star child(harbinger) argues is impossible... meanwhile the geth and their quarian creators are fighting and dying side by side.
its a idiotic tissue paper thin argument that shepard's very existence invalidates.
Exactly and they are attempting to justify it instead of giving a just 100x better ending.....A Mad Monk 2 said:so basically, they are making the shitty ending various colors longer
"Oh look. Someone disagrees with me. Obviously they are trolling. No other reason anyone could defy my glorious logic."Joseph Alexander said:go troll elsewhere.Buchholz101 said:Since this whole thing started, I've been sympathetic to both sides of the argument. The ending really wasn't as good as it should have been, but at the same time it's unfair that we should command the writers to alter their original visions.
It's like the writers are Commander Shepard trying to tell their story and we, the audience are like the Turian Councilor:
"Ah, yes. Creative integrity. We've dismissed that claim."
Thank you.Unsilenced said:"Oh look. Someone disagrees with me. Obviously they are trolling. No other reason anyone could defy my glorious logic."Joseph Alexander said:go troll elsewhere.Buchholz101 said:Since this whole thing started, I've been sympathetic to both sides of the argument. The ending really wasn't as good as it should have been, but at the same time it's unfair that we should command the writers to alter their original visions.
It's like the writers are Commander Shepard trying to tell their story and we, the audience are like the Turian Councilor:
"Ah, yes. Creative integrity. We've dismissed that claim."
and you're indoctrinated.SajuukKhar said:And again, nothing about the peace between The Geth and Quarrians gives any sort of evidence to support that it would last.Joseph Alexander said:thats not the point.
the point is a lasting peace between organics and synthetics, which the star child(harbinger) argues is impossible... meanwhile the geth and their quarian creators are fighting and dying side by side.
its a idiotic tissue paper thin argument that shepard's very existence invalidates.
Being able to make peace with The Geth =/=
-The peace will last
-That peace with other synthetics can be made
-The peace with other synthetics will last
and so on and so on.
What you are doing is trying to that that because you can make cake that cake will be fresh for all time, and that all future cakes made will be equally as good and last as long
Your argument is flawed at the core.
demand a refund, no really.A Mad Monk 2 said:why should EA and bioware care? they already got our moneykillerguythefox said:Exactly and they are attempting to justify it instead of giving a just 100x better ending.....A Mad Monk 2 said:so basically, they are making the shitty ending various colors longer
BUT NOPE they just wanna stick with the ending everyone hates -.-
people should not be okay with this and settle for less
I get the point but remember what they said?Buchholz101 said:Since this whole thing started, I've been sympathetic to both sides of the argument. The ending really wasn't as good as it should have been, but at the same time it's unfair that we should command the writers to alter their original visions.
It's like the writers are Commander Shepard trying to tell their story and we, the audience are like the Turian Councilor:
"Ah, yes. Creative integrity. We've dismissed that claim."