Funny thing is that I probably do. I also wouldnt mind a reasoned response instead of that ad homenim / appeal to authority line you wheeled out.UnnDunn said:Microsoft should hire you to replace Don Mattrick. You obviously have the qualifications and insight for the position.vallorn said:So they built the X1 around features that add to it's price and have been shown by every kinnect enabled game this gen to be either unnessecary or actually dleterous to the game? (Steel Batalion)UnnDunn said:You were quite emphatic on your point. You think Xbox One won't sell in Japan because of its NUI features. That's your opinion, and you're welcome to it.CriticKitten said:No, you are missing the point....UnnDunn said:You're missing the point. Xbox One is designed specifically to be used with Kinect, the same way the Wii is designed specifically to be used with the Wii-mote. There is no Xbox One without Kinect just as there is no Wii without the Wii-mote.
If you don't want a Kinect, don't buy an Xbox One.
I don't understand why this concept is so difficult to grasp. There is no Xbox One without Kinect.
My response was simply to point out that Xbox One is designed around NUI. So if (as you claim) it won't sell in Japan because of NUI, then I guess it won't sell.
That seems like a rather bad move on their part considering that the reason that they "Won" in the USA last generation was mostly due to the X360 being cheaper than the PS3 at launch and so tying in people's friend groups into the system. Making their console more expensive out of the store as well as the various required subscriptions and expensive Microsoft Brand Only Peripherals (Helooo 360 hard drives. (Note: Ps3 hard drives were standard laptop ones and changing them didnt void the warrenty. I should know I did it myself.))that you need to buy seems like a bad business idea if you ask me.
And the other point. Microsoft didnt sell well the last two generations in Japan. Their response isnt to try and court the market with things that they want but to build a console that doesnt fit at all into japanese culture and then further alienate them buy labeling one of the world's biggest markets for video games "Tier 2?" That barrage of poor decisions will likely mean that the X1 probably wont sell even as well as the 360 did and it's just a bad business choice to completly discard and insult large markets like this.
TLDR: I think Microsoft have been drinking the bong water due to their myriad of bad business and marketing decisions. Next comes the Kool-Aid.
So now actually listen to what I have to say please. I know how businesses work and economic theory comes easily to me (I literaly read Hayek's "The Road To Serfdom as light reading material) so dont presume that I dont know what I'm talking about here. I see no plan in Microsoft's actions as a hardware seller. Yes they didnt sell well in Japan but, as I said, instead of fixing that they decided to give up on that market and then insult them by labeling them "Tier 2". The former decision smacks of a struggling company falling back on it's core, local consumer base and the latter is a bad symbolic move in that it sends the signal to many gamers that the X1 isnt for the country which in many ways, heavily influenced and continues to influence gaming culture.