It would depend on the type of person she is/her actual physical appearance I suppose.Everin said:Consider this situation:
Your parents have divorced, and after a while one of your parents remarries. You get a new sister or brother, a few months younger then you. (in this situation its assumed youre around 17). You think your step-sibling is atrractive but you dont really want to do anything.
However, one day, they approach you while your parents are out and suggests, though some hidden meanings, that you and them could try getting physical. The question is, would you? And why or why not?
![]()
Yep, I'd do it. Social taboos do not frighten me.Everin said:Consider this situation:
Your parents have divorced, and after a while one of your parents remarries. You get a new sister or brother, a few months younger then you. (in this situation its assumed youre around 17). You think your step-sibling is atrractive but you dont really want to do anything.
However, one day, they approach you while your parents are out and suggests, though some hidden meanings, that you and them could try getting physical. The question is, would you? And why or why not?
![]()
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAkidd25 said:but then you could have a family within a family.
I'm referring to not feeling attraction to those you've known since your 4 or younger, distinctly possible I've mentioned the wrong freudian idea here.Farther than stars said:Yes, but you're forgetting that Oedipus complex only theoretically applies in a situation where pheromones are produced by someone of a similar genetic composition. In this case that still wouldn't be true.Richardplex said:Unlikely to happen because of the Oedipus complex, but for aforementioned reasons, still cool with.sheah1 said:Hmm....
Alright, I'm not sure, but how about a reverse question?
You and your brother/sister are adopted from different families, and at some point in your lives (when you are both of age), he/she suggests "relations", how do you react?
Personally, even if he/she isn't related by blood, they were raised as brother and sister, so therefore it's still kind of wrong (that's my opinion of my situation, I'm still stumped on the original).
Now if you don't mind, I'm going to cause some form of bodily harm for mentioning the work of Freud in a serious manner.
I was justifying my okayness with incest and nothing being wrong with it before someone launched at me with that particular problem. Since I have nothing wrong with them doing whatever they want even if they are related, I certainly have no problem with them if they aren't.zehydra said:in this scenario procreation wouldn't matter since the two aren't related.Richardplex said:I have no problem with actual incest (so long as no procreation involved) so yes, I'd hit that. No one is harmed, no one is inconvenienced, no-one has the right to call it wrong.