More Battleborn Info Revealed, Including PC System Requirements

ffronw

I am a meat popsicle
Oct 24, 2013
2,804
0
0
More Battleborn Info Revealed, Including PC System Requirements

//cdn.themis-media.com/media/global/images/library/deriv/1304/1304576.jpgThe release date for Battleborn is getting closer, and Gearbox is rolling out more information about the upcoming MOBA shooter.

In a post on the official 2K Blog [https://blog.2k.com/news/], there's a great roundup of info on Battleborn, covering game modes, characters, and more. Most importantly, we now know exactly what the PC system requirements will be. Here's what you'll need to run it:

Minimum System Requirements:

OS: Windows 7 x64-Bit or Later
CPU: Intel i5-750 / AMD Phenom IIx4 945
RAM: 6 GB
Hard Drive: 30 GB free
Video Memory: 1 GB
Minimum Required Video Card: AMD HD 6870/ NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 or better, PhysX support

If you want to crank things up a notch, you'll need a bit more power in your rig, but even these requirements aren't overly onerous.

Recommended System Requirements:

OS: Windows 7 x64-Bit or Later
CPU: Intel i5-750 / AMD Phenom IIx4 945
RAM: 6 GB
Hard Drive: 50 GB free
Video Memory: 2 GB
Recommended Video Card: AMD HD 7850/ NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 or better, PhysX support

Some other interesting info is in that post as well, including a Hardcore Mode for single player, and the ability to play split-screen with your friends. You can check it all out at the 2K blog [https://blog.2k.com/news/].


Permalink
 

Callate

New member
Dec 5, 2008
5,118
0
0
A stock i5-750 runs at 2.66 GHz, by the way.

I can probably run this- assuming, as has usually been the case, that the game which claims it needs Windows 7 will actually run just fine under Windows Vista.
 

Scarim Coral

Jumped the ship
Legacy
Oct 29, 2010
18,157
2
3
Country
UK
Last time I check with Game-Debate website, I can run it (especially thanks to my new graphic card) but that site is not updated with the announce rigs.

In saying so however, I am now NOT getting it now, 50-70gb??? (I have bandwidth limit per say.) In saying so is the disc version on Amazon got the installment in the disc or something (there is a Steam version that cost ?10 more)?
 

Bob_McMillan

Elite Member
Aug 28, 2014
5,428
2,052
118
Country
Philippines
From what I've seen, this game is under even Borderlands in the graphics department. But I know pretty much nothing of PC gaming and their components, so I guess this is good? I don't get why the CPU can be the same for both the minimum and recommended system requirements though.
 

Janichsan

New member
May 26, 2015
108
0
0
Callate said:
I can probably run this- assuming, as has usually been the case, that the game which claims it needs Windows 7 will actually run just fine under Windows Vista.
Your adherence to Windows Vista baffles me.
 

ffronw

I am a meat popsicle
Oct 24, 2013
2,804
0
0
Callate said:
A stock i5-750 runs at 2.66 GHz, by the way.

I can probably run this- assuming, as has usually been the case, that the game which claims it needs Windows 7 will actually run just fine under Windows Vista.
This has usually been the case, but in some cases - most notably Witcher 3 and Star Wars: Battlefront, Vista has kept you from even installing the game
 

Callate

New member
Dec 5, 2008
5,118
0
0
Janichsan said:
Callate said:
I can probably run this- assuming, as has usually been the case, that the game which claims it needs Windows 7 will actually run just fine under Windows Vista.
Your adherence to Windows Vista baffles me.
It shouldn't. My last major computer build, regrettably, came just before Windows 7 came to market. I try to make my computers as future-proof as possible, and by and large, it's succeeded in doing do- in part because the vast majority of games that say they require Windows 7 64-bit will actually run under Windows Vista 64-bit as well.

And I will say, for what it's worth, that the vast majority of the horror stories that surrounded Windows Vista have not reflected my experience.

All that said, I'm not some sort of Vista "loyalist"; it's just that the cost of upgrading to 7, combined with the cost and hassle of re-installing software, finding new drivers, and possibly finding that some of the software I use for work might no longer function at all have hindered me from moving to a new OS. That, of course, combined with the above note that it simply hasn't been necessary to make the move for software compatibility reasons.

My next computer- which I'm hoping to build this year- will run Windows 7, an OEM copy of which rests in my hot little hands. But the new build has more to do with my processor (i7 2.93 GHz) no longer keeping up with the latest software than my OS failing to run it.

ffronw said:
This has usually been the case, but in some cases - most notably Witcher 3 and Star Wars: Battlefront, Vista has kept you from even installing the game
That's good to know, thanks.

My processor has kept the delights of Witcher 3 out of my hands; when the above-mentioned new computer is a reality, it's one of the first on my list.