Alright, I'll bite. What're the reasons to like it?tigermilk said:Thankyou for replying. In my opinion it is one of the five greatest films in the histoy of American cinema for the cinematography and the mythology alone in terms of Welles opposition to the studio system. There are many reasons to love the film (of course it is subjective) but equally as you have highlighted reasons for some not to like the film.Mr.Squishy said:tigermilk said:No, why?Mr.Squishy said:Citizen Kane. You know why.
OT: Death Wish (Winner 1974) and by extension all its sequels. Deeply unpleasant, reactionary, right wing fascistic series of film steeped in class, racial and gender hatred.
It is a boring, dry piece of tripe with a premise founded on a plothole, yet is universally lauded as the "BEST MOVIE EVAR", which implies that 70 years of filmmaking and going are just inferior to one mediocre movie.
Awww, we can't delete this one, its too horrible to not let live.Haseo21 said:Battlefield Earth
I'd go one step further.tehannihalator said:The phantom menance because its awful.
You know, I wasn't fond of it either. Maybe it was something indescribable, or maybe its because Alec Guiness wasn't in it, but it didn't work anywhere near as well as the original did. Did I mention the original had Alec Guiness in it?octafish said:The Ladykillers remake, only Coen Brothers' film I didn't like. Yes I did like Intolerable Cruelty and The Hudsucker Proxy (...not counting the mezzanine).
Damn Ninjas!Sassafrass said:Skyline, Skyline, Skyline, Skyline, Skyline.
Goddamn these ninjas above me have good taste. Right, I'll just go with Tim Burtons version of Alice in Wonderland.zpucek said:Star Wars prequels.
And another step further anything George Lucas has made since the mid 1990s.Zenn3k said:I'd go one step further.tehannihalator said:The phantom menance because its awful.
The Star Wars Prequels, all of them. Ruined Star Wars forever.
So out of all the movies ever made, you wouldn't delete anything by Uwe Boll, MIchael Bay, Roland Emerich, and Ed Wood? Instead you would delete the movie that revolutionized film making from not only a technical perspective, but also a story telling perspective? Dear sir or madam, I don't think you know what you're saying. From low-angle shots to deep focus, the use of in camera effects, and the different kind of story telling not seen in a film yet. The unreliable narrator, the use of makeup to see a whole man's lifetime. The movie was many years ahead of its time. Without it, it would have been years before any of the techniques were founded. Not to mention that it's a great story with a deep narrative about the rise and fall of a man who seemed to have it all. I don't normally say this, but your opinion is flat out wrong.Mr.Squishy said:It is a boring, dry piece of tripe with a premise founded on a plothole, yet is universally lauded as the "BEST MOVIE EVAR", which implies that 70 years of filmmaking and going are just inferior to one mediocre movie.tigermilk said:No, why?Mr.Squishy said:Citizen Kane. You know why.
OT: Death Wish (Winner 1974) and by extension all its sequels. Deeply unpleasant, reactionary, right wing fascistic series of film steeped in class, racial and gender hatred.
I give up.Le_Cable said:Rosemary's Baby
The man makes an excellent pointZenn3k said:Awww, we can't delete this one, its too horrible to not let live.Haseo21 said:Battlefield Earth
Its also the perfect example of
A: Why Hubbard was crazy
B: Why Travolta is a bad actor
C: How NOT to make a movie
All of the Star Wars movies. Seriously, screw those 6 cinematic abominations and screw my parents for making me watch them so much when I was younger...Nate Corran said:If you could delete one movie out of existence (and as a result any sequels or movies that were made as a result) which would it be and why?
Personally I would delete Twilight. Then we wouldn't have to worry about the emasculation of vampires in popular culture and, well, the bloody stupid cultural phenomenon.
While I disagree with you on Leo, HELL YES the rage on Avatar. Yeah, it was pretty, but once i sat down and tried to discern a plot, i got a big load of shit.emeraldrafael said:Either a toss up between Titanic and Inception.
... Actually, you know what, I'll go with Titanic.
Titanic was a crap movie when you get down to it, but it polevaulted James Cameron into Greatness and gave him the Means to Make Avatar, which is another crap movie thats only nice and pretty to look at. Titanic also made Leonardo DeCaprio to look like some great actor and be the best there ever was, which opened up the door for him later in life for Inception (something that was also grossly over loved).
So yeah, Titanic.