So it's pretty clear that the X-Men in the Marvel Universe is supposed to be an allegory for racism and oppression and all of that. It's fairly clear that a lot of normal citizens are afraid of mutants because they possess destructive powers that they can't control. Fair enough.
But if the base fear of mutants is because they are superpowered humans who are potentially dangerous, why are they ok with NON-mutant superheroes? And how can you tell in the first place?
The base definition for a Mutant in the Marvel Universe is someone who's born with extraordinary powers vs. a metahuman who got their powers from an outside source (gamma rays, super soldier serum, powered armor, radioactive spider, cosmic rays, etc). And that doesn't even include the aliens that show up every now and again (Asgardians, Kree, Skrull, etc.) or the magicians (Dr. Strange).
While you can go on and on about the technical differences between each metahuman, it's something I doubt your average civilian in the Marvel Universe is going to know or care. The big issue overall is that uncontrolled superpowers = BAD. But for a group of people and politicians to consider mutants a menace while at the same time being ok with the Avengers (ESPECIALLY since there's been a lot of crossover between teams) just baffles the hell out of me. "OMG, that Wolverine is a mutant freak! But Spidey's cool because he's not a filthy mutant!"
Can you Marvel fans help me out here? Does an anti-mutant organization in the Marvel Universe somehow know the difference between a mutant and a "regular" superhero? Can they really discriminate between Sunspot and the Human Torch, nevermind that they both have fire based powers? Do these anti-mutant groups just hate all people with superpowers in general?
Marvel fans, I hope there's some sort of canon explanation for this kind of discrepancy.
But if the base fear of mutants is because they are superpowered humans who are potentially dangerous, why are they ok with NON-mutant superheroes? And how can you tell in the first place?
The base definition for a Mutant in the Marvel Universe is someone who's born with extraordinary powers vs. a metahuman who got their powers from an outside source (gamma rays, super soldier serum, powered armor, radioactive spider, cosmic rays, etc). And that doesn't even include the aliens that show up every now and again (Asgardians, Kree, Skrull, etc.) or the magicians (Dr. Strange).
While you can go on and on about the technical differences between each metahuman, it's something I doubt your average civilian in the Marvel Universe is going to know or care. The big issue overall is that uncontrolled superpowers = BAD. But for a group of people and politicians to consider mutants a menace while at the same time being ok with the Avengers (ESPECIALLY since there's been a lot of crossover between teams) just baffles the hell out of me. "OMG, that Wolverine is a mutant freak! But Spidey's cool because he's not a filthy mutant!"
Can you Marvel fans help me out here? Does an anti-mutant organization in the Marvel Universe somehow know the difference between a mutant and a "regular" superhero? Can they really discriminate between Sunspot and the Human Torch, nevermind that they both have fire based powers? Do these anti-mutant groups just hate all people with superpowers in general?
Marvel fans, I hope there's some sort of canon explanation for this kind of discrepancy.