I made this thread? >_>s69-5 said:I'm pretty sure you could turn the book of Joshua/ conquering Canaan into an RTS, Action-Adventure or an ARPG.Not G. Ivingname said:The first one is the fact that the Old and New Testimates don't lend them selves as epics that can translate into games.
Giants, Nephilim, Leviathan, Angels, Demons, Asmodai, Azazel, Belial, Kings, armies, traitors, prostitutes, slaves, Golem, people who live 1000+ years, plagues (old testament)Unlike Norse, Chinese or Greek myth, the bible holds few monsters, antgonists to work with, or stories with conflict that is easy to put into an interactive medium.
dragons, demons, antichrist, false prophets, the beast, whore of Babylon, Lucifer, plagues, Abbadon, other hybrid creatures... (revelations)
If you are willing to step just outside of the Bible (like you did with Dante), you have the Ars Goetia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lesser_Key_of_Solomon
72 Demons (and many have thm have already appeared in your favourite RPGs)...
On the same note:
If you go into Apocryphal books like Enoch you get this game:
![]()
Bottom line, your post sounds like it was written by someone who did little to no research on a topic they have little to no knowledge about.
See above.Aby_Z said:Perhaps it's also that a good deal of people are moving towards becoming Atheist or otherwise not part of the main, big religions. Because of this, making a game about the Bible wouldn't go down too well with this growing majority and the game wouldn't sell to well.
See Xenogears/ Xenosaga.
See your avatar to jump to other media
Or maybe Battlestar Gallactica.
You can still make Bible stories. Just don't tell the kids that's what the source material is.
Edit: Wait, I just quoted people on a severely necro'd thread. My apologies to the quotees.
And what is up with all the necromancy lately. Shit people...
This is a 2 year old thread. What's wrong with you?Nieroshai said:snip
That's right, you should be ashamed.s69-5 said:snip
Good for you, you owned me in front of the whole forum. You deserve a cookie.Aby_Z said:This is a 2 year old thread. What's wrong with you?Nieroshai said:snip
That's right, you should be ashamed.s69-5 said:snip
You misquote me. "So it must be about a religion dying" was referring to Christianity ("a" religion) not all religions at large. And isn't agnosticism the belief that ultimate truth is not just currently unknown, but indefinitely unknowable? I thought agnosticism was the definite belief in uncertainty, not just being on the fence.Monsterfurby said:The thing is - Atheism is not a non-religion. It is a religious confession like any other, with more informal structures, admittedly, but even Atheism hat its sects and confessions, its leaders and followers, its canon and tradition.Nieroshai said:So it must be about a religion dying, not about the terrible quality of these cash-ins. And Christianity is on the rise, especially in China. Especially in China. Its illegality is only making it grow faster there than anywhere else.Aby_Z said:Perhaps it's also that a good deal of people are moving towards becoming Atheist or otherwise not part of the main, big religions. Because of this, making a game about the Bible wouldn't go down too well with this growing majority and the game wouldn't sell to well.
People may shift between religions, but I can only guess that Atheism will see a similar development eventually.
One shouldn't kid oneself - any religious stance that is followed with any sort of certainty (i.e. 'belief') is religion. The only thing that falls out of this is agnosticism ('I don't know' instead of 'I believe) and cynical mock religions.
And then there are Agnostic Theists like myself. Sounds complicated, but summarizes prettily into "Faith in a higher power is a higher power in itself".