Nanobots Are One Step Closer

Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
Nanobots Are One Step Closer


Microscopic repair machines have been a staple of science fiction for decades. Now that they have motors, they're one swim closer to reality.

Red Dwarf, Doctor Who, Metal Gear Solid and System Shock 2 have all relied on the idea of tiny machines(nanobots/nanites) that can alter the body's makeup at a microscopic level. The advancement of technology has already made microscopic electronics possible- the problem was getting the darn things to move.

Conventional electrical motors have a lower limit of the millimeter dimension where the resistance to movement becomes almost impossible to overcome. (Physicists can see a similar effect in surface tension [http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/surten.html].)

Now, research reported in the Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering [http://www.iop.org/EJ/journal/JMM] has demonstrated a motor about twice the size of a human hair. This latest research uses piezoelectric materials [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piezoelectric], which typically are crystals that expand and contract when voltage is applied to them.

Professor James Friend of the University of Monash [http://www.monash.edu.au/], Australia, has already produced work last year on a motor about the size of a grain of salt, but they were still linear motors (back and forth). To perform real movement, the motors need to be able to rotate.

This has been overcome by building a "screw" into the motor, so that a forward motion at the right time also rotates the motor, in a similar way that bacteria move with their tails.

The prototype "spinning motor" is only a quarter of a millimeter wide, 70% smaller than its nearest competitor.

Source: BBC [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7837967.stm]


Permalink
 

Galletea

Inexplicably Awesome
Sep 27, 2008
2,877
0
0
This is looking very interesting. Bionic limbs, and now nanomachines. The futuristic age set in sci fi and videogames is coming closer all the time.
 

iain62a

New member
Oct 9, 2008
815
0
0
Right then, all we need is teleportion, faster than light travel & the gravity gun.
 

ElephantGuts

New member
Jul 9, 2008
3,520
0
0
I personally think that nanobots are the cure for cancer. Surely you could program them to effectively identify and eliminate cancerous cells, then inject a few of them into the bloodstream? And I thought of this and haven't heard anybody else mention it, though somebody else probably has thought of it, but if you steal my idea I will hunt you down and atleast ask you where you got the idea from. And if you stole it from me, I may go so far as to demand an apology.

Just make sure they can differentiate between cancerous and non-cancerous cells. That'd be bad, if they started killing every cell in your body from the inside out. And that's the plot for an apocolyptic movie right there.
 

cainx10a

New member
May 17, 2008
2,191
0
0
ElephantGuts said:
I personally think that nanobots are the cure for cancer. Surely you could program them to effectively identify and eliminate cancerous cells, then inject a few of them into the bloodstream? And I thought of this and haven't heard anybody else mention it, though somebody else probably has thought of it, but if you steal my idea I will hunt you down and atleast ask you where you got the idea from. And if you stole it from me, I may go so far as to demand an apology.

Just make sure they can differentiate between cancerous and non-cancerous cells. That'd be bad, if they started killing every cell in your body from the inside out. And that's the plot for an apocolyptic movie right there.
Yeah, nano-machines could be the perfect killing machines. It's scary to think about how technology will be in 20-50 years from today.
 

CoverYourHead

High Priest of C'Thulhu
Dec 7, 2008
2,514
0
0
I don't trust robots in my blood! They're bound to get something wrong and something terrible will happen.
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
ElephantGuts said:
That'd be bad, if they started killing every cell in your body from the inside out. And that's the plot for an apocolyptic movie right there.
Michael Crichton's Prey, if I remember rightly.
 

ElephantGuts

New member
Jul 9, 2008
3,520
0
0
The_root_of_all_evil said:
ElephantGuts said:
That'd be bad, if they started killing every cell in your body from the inside out. And that's the plot for an apocolyptic movie right there.
Michael Crichton's Prey, if I remember rightly.
I looked that book up, sounds good. I should get my hands on it some time. I knew someone must have thought of that already. The good thing being that that book is one step closer to becoming reality. Or, the bad thing I guess.
 

Damien the Pigeon

New member
Oct 23, 2008
730
0
0
That's incredible! Wow, I really get excited when I think about all the neat stuff I'll see in my lifetime. Especially because stuff like this is already happening. What's the next step?
 

zacaron

New member
Apr 7, 2008
1,179
0
0
it will be wierd when you can just inject yourself with for lack of a better word a "health pack" containing nanomites that will repair damage in your body.
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
ElephantGuts said:
The_root_of_all_evil said:
ElephantGuts said:
That'd be bad, if they started killing every cell in your body from the inside out. And that's the plot for an apocolyptic movie right there.
Michael Crichton's Prey, if I remember rightly.
I looked that book up, sounds good. I should get my hands on it some time. I knew someone must have thought of that already. The good thing being that that book is one step closer to becoming reality. Or, the bad thing I guess.
And, of course, they can do worse...

Mum-mmy?
 

Brokkr

New member
Nov 25, 2008
656
0
0
This is pretty cool. I hadn't realized that they were this far along toward nano-machines.
 

BobisOnlyBob

is Only Bob
Nov 29, 2007
657
0
0
Just another step on the path to posthuman. Gotta love Nanotechnology!

I am the very model of a Singularitarian,
I'm combination transhuman, immortalist, extropian ~

(here it is on YouTube [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hKG5l_TDU8&fmt=18], it's a fun little take on a possible high-tech future set to a somewhat recognisable tune)
 

51gunner

New member
Jun 12, 2008
583
0
0
I'm a bit picky in my terminology: these are microbots, not nanobots. They'll work at a cellular level, not a molecular level. Microbots are possible to build, nano impossible. Mind you, that's just a nomenclature thing and generally it all goes by the name 'nanotechnology' anyways.

Nitpicks aside, these things are still freaking awesome and have huge potential. Among the (non-evil) uses for them, the best is in medicine. For a good example in Sci-Fi, read The Terminal Experiment by Robert J. Sawyer. A company there invents and does a pitch for these kinds of robots, and pretty much detail how awesome they are. Oh, and it's an awesome book and author anyways.
 

fuckwit

New member
Jan 4, 2009
232
0
0
Bionics FTW
oops, sorry for that.
When cyborgian equipment hits the market, I will immediately go and have my eyes implanted with zooming equipment.
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
51gunner said:
I'm a bit picky in my terminology: these are microbots, not nanobots. They'll work at a cellular level, not a molecular level. Microbots are possible to build, nano impossible. Mind you, that's just a nomenclature thing and generally it all goes by the name 'nanotechnology' anyways.
True, I was having difficulty in writing this to whether they were micro, nano, pico, groucho or zeppo-bots.

I stuck with nanobots as that's the most often used term.