Nanofiber Breakthrough Creates Supertough, Strong Material

Kyrian007

Nemo saltat sobrius
Legacy
Mar 9, 2010
2,567
649
118
Kansas
Country
U.S.A.
Gender
Male
Formica Archonis said:
Come on, spaceelevatorspaceelevatorspaceelevatorspaceelevator.
Right!

All they've been missing is a light, strong enough, and tough enough material and we could have (relatively) effortless liftoff capability. If this stuff is tough enough... a working skyhook changes everything.
 

AlwaysPractical

New member
Oct 7, 2011
209
0
0
"in which a high voltage is applied [...] until a continuous jet of liquid ejects" ... context is everything

OT: very cool, I hope we can see this soon applied and maybe move away from environmentally dangerous pratices like aluminium mining and maybe make the wasteful process of unibody design less attractive to manufacturers.
 

Bug MuIdoon

New member
Mar 28, 2013
285
0
0
Am I the only person who craved some of these after seeing the image on this article?


OT: Seems pretty cool. I wonder how much it costs to manufacture though?
 

Dirty Hipsters

This is how we praise the sun!
Legacy
Feb 7, 2011
7,927
2,290
118
Country
'Merica
Gender
3 children in a trench coat
MorganL4 said:
Yay, shameless plug at the end :p

But on a more serious note... This actually seems really cool... could they make it into a cloth? If so that could be great for the military, having bullet proof sleeves and pants, and not just something that will protect the torso. Fingers crossed on that front...
The problem with that idea is that even if a bullet can't pass through something, it still imparts a huge amount of force on impact. There are already soft body armors that exist, but while they're very good at stopping bullets, they aren't very good at protecting people from the blunt force from the bullet, because when the bullet hits the soft surface most of the bullet's energy is absorbed in a very small area of the vest, and therefore still goes directly into the body, very often causing broken bones and internal bleeding. That's why when people wear soft body armor they almost always wear what's known as a "trauma plate" (which is a rectangular plate made of metal or ceramic) over the soft body armor, in order to reduce the blunt force trauma caused by the bullet hitting their body armor.

So if you imagine bullet proof clothing made out of nanofibers, people would still be heavily injured by the bullets. Sure, the bullets wouldn't actually enter the person's body, but all of the force of the bullet would still be imparted to that body causing heavy blunt force trauma, breaking bones and causing internal bleeding. To have effective body armor you need the bullet to hit a hard surface to more evenly distribute the force.

Basically the use of these kinds of nano-fibers in creating body armor wouldn't be creating body armor that has more coverage, but rather creating body armor that is lighter and easier to move in.
 

Do4600

New member
Oct 16, 2007
934
0
0
Formica Archonis said:
Come on, spaceelevatorspaceelevatorspaceelevatorspaceelevator.

Also: Nothing wrong with the Geekend Update plug. It's a good show.
Sol_HSA said:
Space elevator, anyone?
Kyrian007 said:
Formica Archonis said:
Come on, spaceelevatorspaceelevatorspaceelevatorspaceelevator.
Right!

All they've been missing is a light, strong enough, and tough enough material and we could have (relatively) effortless liftoff capability. If this stuff is tough enough... a working skyhook changes everything.
I'm so glad I'm not the only one who immediately jumped to this at the very mention of a super strong super tough nano-material.
 

tahrey

New member
Sep 18, 2009
1,124
0
0
Heh...

As I saw commented on a recent story about nanowire-equipped solar cells (supposedly) doing a similar thing for the renewable energy scene... "take a word, add 'nano' to it, bask in the ensuing nerd-love and rake in the VC cash, even though it might not actually offer any benefit at all..."

As per GeneralBob - yeah... that's pretty cool, especially the electrojaculation or whatever they actually called it. But call me when they finally find a practical use for the stuff. Otherwise it may as well just be more buckyballs / carbon nanotubes. The former have been around for the better part of a half century and still aren't used for anything even vaguely mainstream (or money-spinning, which can be about as important; if a thing isn't making money for *someone*, chances are it's not actually that widely useful regardless of how "revolutionary" it may be in research terms).
 

Xarathox

New member
Feb 12, 2013
346
0
0
Was hoping to read that NASA figured out a way to cheaply mass produce Carbon Nantube so we can finally have that space elevator they've been dreaming of for two decades.

Should've known better.
 

Yopaz

Sarcastic overlord
Jun 3, 2009
6,092
0
0
GeneralBob said:
I can't help but be cynical about most scientific breakthroughs. The difference between creating microscopic quantities of something in a lab and employing the material in construction is at least a decade of production engineering, safety testing, standard setting, manufacturing contracts, environmental compliance, etc. And any step could be the death of it. I mean WHAT IF IT SMELLS BAD!?
So because something doesn't have practical applications right now we should abandon it and consider it a waste that we ever made it? By that logic we wouldn't even have iron except for what we've collected from meteors. Lots of these discoveries wont ever see a practical use, but imagine if we were cynical about silicon, the purification process there is really quite complex. We might just as well have skipped aluminium since that's a complex process and there's a lot of pollution.

Learning new methods can be as important as the product itself.
 

Gearhead mk2

New member
Aug 1, 2011
19,999
0
0
So in a few years time, when someone asks how all this stuff works, we will have an excuse to say
Science, I love ya baby.
 

Soviet Steve

New member
May 23, 2009
1,511
0
0
Very interesting. An innovation in construction material might seem trivial on the onset but it is on their foundation that civilization rests. Now if they can only make something like this be extremely light we can really change everything.

GeneralBob said:
I can't help but be cynical about most scientific breakthroughs. The difference between creating microscopic quantities of something in a lab and employing the material in construction is at least a decade of production engineering, safety testing, standard setting, manufacturing contracts, environmental compliance, etc. And any step could be the death of it. I mean WHAT IF IT SMELLS BAD!?
Asbestos.
 

blackrave

New member
Mar 7, 2012
2,020
0
0
Lunar elevator anyone?
.
.
.
Someone???
.
.
.
Not a single person? O well time to crawl back to my corner and dream about such megaconstructions in solitude :(