There are a million things that could be done instead of the standard "show a bunch of faces" crap that everyone (in the US at least) does these days. It's based on some marketing bullshit that can be summed up as, "Americans don't like art or theming, and have to see the faces of the main characters," according to advertisers.90sgamer said:What do you want to see on the cover then?Akratus said:There's still a man in a stance reminiscent of soldiers walking to the camera looking off in the distance. It's still a main characters focused image which is much more of an epidemic than male dominance in video game covers. I'm sick of just characters on a cover like the photoshop face collage plague.
Considering how many people actually bought Mirror's Edge, that might not be the best example.sam13lfc said:Yep, and Mirror's Edge, Bayonetta, one of the ME3 cases tooBelmontWolf said:2 words...Tomb Raider...
You could always make the joke that Naughty Dog and Insomniac are secretly the same developer.EHKOS said:I thought of that joke so long ago, shame I didn't act on it and make that picture.Souplex said:I'm worried about Naughty Dog. First they don't release Uncharted Racing, now they move on to a game where a racing game wouldn't fit.
OT: Good, ND is one of those studios that broke a lot of molds, and I'm glad they can continue being their own person other than an industry slave.
That's the feeling I got from this. This doesn't seem like something anyone would make a fuss about. As far as I (and apparently just about everyone on this thread)am aware no one thought that this was at all an issue until Naughty Dog came in and told us it was. Seems like they're trying to show how "progressive" they're being.Doclector said:Gotta admit, this kind of seems like it's trying to capitalise on the issues about bioshock infinite's cover. Not the cover itself of course, just naughty dog saying this. It's like "HEY! LOOK AT US! WE'RE TRYING TO MAKE SOMETHING MORE THAN A GENERIC SHOOTER AND WE'RE PREPARED TO HAVE A COVER THAT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE A GENERIC SHOOTER, UNLIKE THOSE OTHER GUYS!"
I'm not saying naughty dog are bad, I can't blame them for taking such an opportunity to point it out, but that's how it comes across.
At the same time, I feel the need to say that I really don't have a problem with the bioshock infinite cover. Generic? As hell. Still pretty cool? Yep.
I look at it this way: People who know what bioshock infinite's really going for, who have been following infinite for ages, will already buy the game, meaning irrational don't need to aim for them. Thus the generic cover. Hopefully, someone suckered in by such a cover will take the plunge with the game, and find a better experience than they expected.
It's a decision geared towards profit, sure, but I don't think it's one that deserves the backlash it's got.
bing bing bing! right on the money! i was going to say something similar but you beat me to the punch, so i can point to your post and just say "pretty much this".gardian06 said:though I do feel that the main character shouldn't even need to be there on the cover, I mean remove the guy from the cover, and you actually have a lot more interesting image to deal with. you would have the ruined city scape, a anxious if not scared young person (in this case female), who looks that "I have this rifle, and I hope that I can use it to protect myself"
not only do you break away from the "women are weak" sentiment, but you also deliver something interesting, and almost cinematic on its own, but I could see some backlash that "there is only a girl on the cover, and I am playing as a guy without the option of playing as the girl."