Netflix Launches New, Low-Quality Streaming for Canadians

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
Netflix Launches New, Low-Quality Streaming for Canadians


Netflix is making things better by making things worse with an all-new, low-quality streaming video option for the Canadian market and its tiny little download caps.

New services from companies of just about any type are usually heralded as bigger, bolder and better than ever before. Not so with Netflix in Canada, however. For its customers in the Great White North, Netflix has launched a new, downgraded service that purports to use two-thirds less data on average with "minimal impact" on the quality of the video.

30 hours of Netflix will normally consume about 30 GB of data, the company said, and up to 70 GB if it's all in hi-def. Using the new "Canada Crapcast" option, however, and which for the record is not an official title, 30 hours of streaming will only eat about nine GB of Canadians' data allowance.

"We made these changes because many Canadian internet service providers unfortunately enforce monthly caps on the total amount of data consumed," Netflix Chief Product Officer Neil Hunt said. "While there is some lessening of picture quality with these new settings, the experience continues to be great."

Canadians will still have the option to stick with higher-quality, ie. normal, video streams if they prefer. Whether this new service will be made available to customers in the U.S. is unknown, but it's hard to imagine why they'd want it. For more information about Netflix's exciting new lo-def offering check out blog.netflix.com [http://blog.netflix.com/2011/03/netflix-lowers-data-usage-by-23-for.html].


Permalink
 

Marter

Elite Member
Legacy
Oct 27, 2009
14,276
19
43
Now if only they'd have our video selection rival that of the US Netflix, we'd be all set...
 

Hiphophippo

New member
Nov 5, 2009
3,509
0
0
That's nice of them but it reminds me that there is only so much data to go around. That's why it's limited. Finite Data.

Right, Canada?
Right, Comcast?
Right. AT&T?

Right?
 

dex-dex

New member
Oct 20, 2009
2,531
0
0
Marter said:
Now if only they'd have our video selection rival that of the US Netflix, we'd be all set...
I agree!
there is a reason why I have no jumped on the Netflix band wagon like many family members and friends have done.
 

hansari

New member
May 31, 2009
1,256
0
0
I'd like to see examples of 30gb vs 9gb stream.... It sounds like a huge disparity, but then again, theres a quality difference between 480 and 720p that is noticeable....720 and 1080...meh not so much.
 

Onyx Oblivion

Borderlands Addict. Again.
Sep 9, 2008
17,032
0
0
That's...nice?

I guess.

I can't imagine life with any sort of cap on my intranets.
 

Wolfram23

New member
Mar 23, 2004
4,095
0
0
Meh give me full HD instead, please!

I think they're in cahoots with telecom companies who try limiting our data. Bastards.
 

ranyilliams

New member
Dec 26, 2008
139
0
0
This makes me honestly embarrassed to be in canada right now... HEY CANADA'S INTERNET PROVIDERS! COMPANIES ARE ACTUALLY DUMBING DOWN THEIR SERVICES FOR US BECAUSE YOU ARE SO GREEDY! DO YOU THINK THAT MAKES US LOOK GOOD?????? IT MAKES US LOOK LIKE MONEY GRUBBING PEOPLE!!!!

Bell, Rogers...WHY YOU BE SO GREEDY!!!!
 

Braedan

New member
Sep 14, 2010
697
0
0
Wolfram01 said:
Meh give me full HD instead, please!

I think they're in cahoots with telecom companies who try limiting our data. Bastards.
I personally see this as a shot across the bow AGAINST telecom companies. They tried to lower our caps to stop Netflix from taking over(why pay for Cable TV, which Bell, Telus, and Rogers provide, when you can pay for ONE unlimited service and watch on demand?), and Netflix responded with a more economical streaming quality.
Edit: I guess technically it would be two services, but $8 for netflix or $50 for full HD programming?

Point Netflix.
 

frago roc

New member
Aug 13, 2009
205
0
0
Braedan said:
Wolfram01 said:
Meh give me full HD instead, please!

I think they're in cahoots with telecom companies who try limiting our data. Bastards.
I personally see this as a shot across the bow AGAINST telecom companies. They tried to lower our caps to stop Netflix from taking over(why pay for Cable TV, which Bell, Telus, and Rogers provide, when you can pay for ONE unlimited service and watch on demand?), and Netflix responded with a more economical streaming quality.
Edit: I guess technically it would be two services, but $8 for netflix or $50 for full HD programming?

Point Netflix.
Agreed, although with my plan we always hit the data cap and hit the $50 overage cap too, so it's a moot point - We just consider the monthly price of internet + $50 to be our unlimited plan. That is until those bastards raise the overage cap...
 

Veloxe

New member
Oct 5, 2010
491
0
0
Braedan said:
Wolfram01 said:
Meh give me full HD instead, please!

I think they're in cahoots with telecom companies who try limiting our data. Bastards.
I personally see this as a shot across the bow AGAINST telecom companies. They tried to lower our caps to stop Netflix from taking over(why pay for Cable TV, which Bell, Telus, and Rogers provide, when you can pay for ONE unlimited service and watch on demand?), and Netflix responded with a more economical streaming quality.
Edit: I guess technically it would be two services, but $8 for netflix or $50 for full HD programming?

Point Netflix.
Now we just wait for the telecom companies to throttle netflix and claim that it's to stop those dastardly paying customers pirates.
 

mew4ever23

New member
Mar 21, 2008
818
0
0
I guess that might help people suffering with caps up here in the great white north. But this is just a work around for a bigger problem - Internet caps.
 

Super Toast

Supreme Overlord of the Basement
Dec 10, 2009
2,476
0
0
If the Canadian internet cap is considered to be awful, we Australians must be primitive by comparison. Not to mention that 200kb/ps is considered fast down under.
 

KeyMaster45

Gone Gonzo
Jun 16, 2008
2,846
0
0
Andy Chalk said:
Using the new "Canada Crapcast" option, however, and which for the record is not an official title
It totally should be though, would really make a statement to telecom companies that want to impose data caps and other such nonsense on their customers.

There's no way to justify them, at all. The only proper argument is that they want more money for every megabyte that passes through your computer/smartphone. You can't run out of data, it's an infinite resource making the laws of supply and demand moot. As for bandwidth if they end up with more people on their service than their network infrastructure is able to handle why not use some of that money people pay them every month to access their porn(don't lie we know that's the internet's primary use) for...oh I don't know, expanding/upgrading the network infrastructure?