I saw the name on this one other flash site I go to. Thing is, I don't even have a problem with them. Their porn just frightens me.BrotherhoodOfSteel said:Hahahahaha... I guess Drow has already seen it. Before I say nice review, I have to say the 2 minutes that I ended up experienceing that game, made me feel like I should call my grandfather, and ask him if I could borrow his old Mosin-Nagant for a few minutes. It is the game that made me understand a bit more about why they're the internet's punching bag.
I don't know, I haven't actually played it. Furry porn just doesn't do it for me.scotth266 said:I suppose that this "High Tail Hall" game is something to be avoided? I mean, I've seen what Newgrounds likes to pass off as "Dating Sims": "Get physically/emotionally abused by slutty/horny women that do not exist in reality until they become your willing sex slaves" would be more appropriate.
Well, Sturgeon's Law, you know? I'm only playing and reviewing a shortlist already (well...a second shortlist, since there's no way I'm touching some of the stuff that's already been translated).razer17 said:Again very well written review. I have gotten hold of all the titles you have reviewed so far, except Xchange, so thanks for reviewing them, and letting us know what's good in the world of ero.
Also, I like the style of your reviews, with the sub headings for each part. Some people don't like it, but I personally feel it's easier to read when it's split up, and it makes your review more organised than others.
And the other, that's good to know! That's actually my exact reasoning for the format; kind of funny, since the first time was just ad hoc (and someone pointed out that Technical wasn't well-defined, which certainly helped). But yeah, paragraphs are all well and good, but I can't help but feel I'm just writing an essay instead of a review with just those...