New Data Shows Black Holes Are Bigger Than Expected

Encaen

New member
May 6, 2005
999
0
0
New Data Shows Black Holes Are Bigger Than Expected



With masses upwards of 10 billion times that of the sun, ultramassive black holes are more common than originally thought.

Using data from several observatories around the world, scientists have concluded that the expected masses of various black holes in our cosmic backyard were significantly understated, suggesting that some of those formerly classified only as supermassive might actually be ultramassive. "Ultramassive black holes - that is, black holes with masses exceeding 10 billion solar masses - are probably not rare; several and even dozens of these colossal black holes may exist," said Julie Hlavacek-Larrondo, the study's lead author. We currently expect supermassive black holes in the center of virtually every large galaxy. What we didn't expect, however, was the existence of so many ultramassive black holes.

Looking initially at data from NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory, researchers discovered that, in a sample of 18 galaxy clusters, at least 10 of the black holes are between 10 and 40 billion solar masses. "Some of our black hole mass predictions are just lower limits, so they could be higher," Hlavacek-Larrondo said, going on to suggest that we might one day find a black hole with 100 billion times the mass of the sun, "which really is ultra-big."

Having located the black holes for the study, scientists estimated their masses by analyzing X-rays and radio waves generated by consuming their surrounding gas, dust, and stars. Using the X-ray data from Chandra, in addition to radio data from the Very Large Array in New Mexico and the Australia Telescope Compact Array, in addition to infrared data from the 2-Micron All-Sky Survey, researchers used the relationship between the amount of radiation they exude and the mass of the black hole to determine their sizes, though they discovered that these black holes are roughly 10 times the size one would expect given the size of their respective host galaxies.

In short, scientists have no idea how these black holes came to be so large, given that their diet is largely restricted by the size of their host galaxy, current models don't do well predicting black holes of these masses. While there were some predictions of ultramassive black holes prior to the study, the fact that there are so many of them is still somewhat astonishing. Once the findings have been verified, they will have "important ramifications for understanding the formation and evolution of black holes across cosmic time."

Source: Space.com [http://www.space.com/18976-ultramassive-black-holes-bigger-than-thought.html]
Image: NASA [http://www.nasa.gov]

[http://www.escapistmagazine.com/content/eve/science.php]

Permalink
 

-Dragmire-

King over my mind
Mar 29, 2011
2,821
0
0
I wonder what the range is of the massive black hole's gravitational influence. 40 billion solar star mass is pretty freaking big.
 

Richardplex

New member
Jun 22, 2011
1,731
0
0
-Dragmire- said:
I wonder what the range is of the massive black hole's gravitational influence. 40 billion solar star mass is pretty freaking big.
Well, actual range is infinite, much like any object with mass. The event horizon (where the escape velocity is larger than the speed of light) can be found using the Schwarzschild radius formula, radius = 2*gravitation constant*mass / speed speed of light squared, which gives a radius of 1.18x10^14 metres, or 117 billion km, or 780 times the size of our sun.

As for range where stuff can orbit? The range which the black hole would exert the same force on an object (mass wouldn't matter if the object is the same mass in both cases) as the sun does to Earth, ~150 million km, would be. Using Newton's rules of gravity (F=two times(grav constant * mass of larger object * mass of smaller object) / radius squared), because I don't particularly want to do Einstein's at the moment, would be around 30 trillion kilometres. Which is about 200,000 times larger. Though I was only using 2 significant figures throughout, but it'd be the right order of magnitude I'd wager. That's also just equating the force exerted on the earth by the sun with how far the black hole must be from an object to get the same force; the sun has objects way farther orbiting it. You can also think of it as, at 30 trillion km's away from the singularity, a sun sized object must be 200,000 times closer than the singularity to overpower it.

Or, the range is pretty freaking huge.
[sub]I'm a physics student, this is what I do, stop judging me[/sub]
 

Jynthor

New member
Mar 30, 2012
774
0
0
The universe is a scary, scary place...

What if:
Black Holes are evil gods who do nothing but feed on the rest of the galaxy And grow, and grow until nothing is left but evil fat space gods!
 

The_Darkness

New member
Nov 8, 2010
546
0
0
Richardplex said:
-Dragmire- said:
I wonder what the range is of the massive black hole's gravitational influence. 40 billion solar star mass is pretty freaking big.
Well, actual range is infinite, much like any object with mass. The event horizon (where the escape velocity is larger than the speed of light) can be found using the Schwarzschild radius formula, radius = 2*gravitation constant*mass / speed speed of light squared, which gives a radius of 1.18x10^14 metres, or 117 billion km, or 780 times the size of our sun.

As for range where stuff can orbit? The range which the black hole would exert the same force on an object (mass wouldn't matter if the object is the same mass in both cases) as the sun does to Earth, ~150 million km, would be. Using Newton's rules of gravity (F=(2*grav constant * mass of larger object * mass of smaller object) / radius squared), because I don't particularly want to do Einstein's at the moment, would be around 30 trillion kilometres. Which is about 200,000 times larger. Though I was only using 2 significant figures throughout, but it'd be the right order of magnitude I'd wager. That's also just equating the force exerted on the earth by the sun with how far the black hole must be from an object to get the same force; the sun has objects way farther orbiting it. You can also think of it as, at 30 trillion km's away from the singularity, a sun sized object must be 200,000 times closer than the singularity to overpower it.

Or, the range is pretty freaking huge.
[sub]I'm a physics student, this is what I do, stop judging me[/sub]
Fellow Physicist here - Astrophysicist actually, and we only ever work to order of magnitude - your maths checks out :)
(Although there's an extra factor of 2 in your formula - but it cancels anyway.) I just got R[sub]blackhole orbit[/sub] = 200,000R[sub]earth:sun[/sub] too.

The question on my mind is what's feeding it, and I do wonder how Dark Matter plays into this. After all, dark matter is the (currently) unsolved mystery of galactic structure. I'd guess that we're only seeing the visible matter that's feeding the black hole, or we've underestimated the amount of Dark Matter being fed in... Not my field, unfortunately, so I can't speculate beyond that.
 

Alandoril

New member
Jul 19, 2010
532
0
0
Extra-dimensional matter. That accounts for the size.

Or perhaps they are universal remnants still attached to their former realities via the singularity.
 

gardian06

New member
Jun 18, 2012
403
0
0
now Johhny don't eat that planet, or you won't fit in you local cluster any more. see it can even apply to black holes yay for science.
 

Remus

Reprogrammed Spambot
Nov 24, 2012
1,698
0
0
Alandoril said:
Extra-dimensional matter. That accounts for the size.

Or perhaps they are universal remnants still attached to their former realities via the singularity.
This would lead to the probability that these black holes aren't just pulling in material immediately around them, but also from different points in time. Given the right location where different galaxies might intersect at different times, this could easily account for the mass requirement of an ultramassive black hole.
 

Alandoril

New member
Jul 19, 2010
532
0
0
Remus said:
Alandoril said:
Extra-dimensional matter. That accounts for the size.

Or perhaps they are universal remnants still attached to their former realities via the singularity.
This would lead to the probability that these black holes aren't just pulling in material immediately around them, but also from different points in time. Given the right location where different galaxies might intersect at different times, this could easily account for the mass requirement of an ultramassive black hole.
Indeed, given that they are probably not bound by the "laws" of physics as we are currently able to comprehend them. I know it's far-fetched but my mind is groggy with ale and awash with possibilities :)
 

Richardplex

New member
Jun 22, 2011
1,731
0
0
The_Darkness said:
Fellow Physicist - Astrophysicist actually, and we only ever work to order of magnitude - your maths checks out :) (although there's an extra factor of 2 in your formula - but it cancels anyway.) I just got R[sub]blackhole orbit[/sub] = 200,000R[sub]earth:sun[/sub]

The question on my mind is what's feeding it, and I do wonder how dark matter plays into this. After all, dark matter is the (currently) unsolved mystery of galactic structure. If we're only seeing the visible matter that's feeding the black hole, or if we've underestimated the amount of Dark Matter being fed in... Not my field, unfortunately, so I can't speculate beyond that.
Theoretical physicist here, so I'm used to completely different scales. And good job brain, combining the gravitational energy and force formula despite the fact you were reading the force formula off wikipedia, fantastic effort there. Going to explain points in case some lurker hasn't realised that reading a conversation between physicists is a foolish idea.

I'd also assume dark matter, and dark energy, with the latter being so present (23% and 73% of the mass of the universe respectively) that it can't be ignored (and the fact it travels means momentum, thus can't escape the event horizon, since gravity affects momentum, not mass), but so non-understood we can't use it either. I can't even comprehend singularities, so I wouldn't know - their creation blatantly defy the exclusion principle (two or more identical fermions can not exist in the same quantum state at the same time, black holes are when super-massive stars collapse to a single 0 dimensional point - thus an obnoxious number of particles exist at the same point). Such that this
Remus said:
Alandoril said:
Extra-dimensional matter. That accounts for the size.

Or perhaps they are universal remnants still attached to their former realities via the singularity.
This would lead to the probability that these black holes aren't just pulling in material immediately around them, but also from different points in time. Given the right location where different galaxies might intersect at different times, this could easily account for the mass requirement of an ultramassive black hole.
Is looking reasonable at this point. God, not sure if we're living in the future or we're really desperate to even count this as a possibility. I'd lean more towards matter from other dimensions, but since singularities care not for your ideas of "time" (past the event horizon, an eternity could pass outside and no time would pass inside the event horizon) and we have virtual particles borrowing energy from the future, still viable. Though we theoretically should see some effect of this - galaxies having lost mass in a non uniform way without any discernible reason.
 

-Dragmire-

King over my mind
Mar 29, 2011
2,821
0
0
Richardplex said:
-Dragmire- said:
I wonder what the range is of the massive black hole's gravitational influence. 40 billion solar star mass is pretty freaking big.
Well, actual range is infinite, much like any object with mass. The event horizon (where the escape velocity is larger than the speed of light) can be found using the Schwarzschild radius formula, radius = 2*gravitation constant*mass / speed speed of light squared, which gives a radius of 1.18x10^14 metres, or 117 billion km, or 780 times the size of our sun.

As for range where stuff can orbit? The range which the black hole would exert the same force on an object (mass wouldn't matter if the object is the same mass in both cases) as the sun does to Earth, ~150 million km, would be. Using Newton's rules of gravity (F=(2*grav constant * mass of larger object * mass of smaller object) / radius squared), because I don't particularly want to do Einstein's at the moment, would be around 30 trillion kilometres. Which is about 200,000 times larger. Though I was only using 2 significant figures throughout, but it'd be the right order of magnitude I'd wager. That's also just equating the force exerted on the earth by the sun with how far the black hole must be from an object to get the same force; the sun has objects way farther orbiting it. You can also think of it as, at 30 trillion km's away from the singularity, a sun sized object must be 200,000 times closer than the singularity to overpower it.

Or, the range is pretty freaking huge.
[sub]I'm a physics student, this is what I do, stop judging me[/sub]
No judging, only envy. I think I bombed Math and Physics 1...
 

InsanityRequiem

New member
Nov 9, 2009
700
0
0
Richardplex said:
The_Darkness said:
Fellow Physicist - Astrophysicist actually, and we only ever work to order of magnitude - your maths checks out :) (although there's an extra factor of 2 in your formula - but it cancels anyway.) I just got R[sub]blackhole orbit[/sub] = 200,000R[sub]earth:sun[/sub]

The question on my mind is what's feeding it, and I do wonder how dark matter plays into this. After all, dark matter is the (currently) unsolved mystery of galactic structure. If we're only seeing the visible matter that's feeding the black hole, or if we've underestimated the amount of Dark Matter being fed in... Not my field, unfortunately, so I can't speculate beyond that.
Theoretical physicist here, so I'm used to completely different scales. And good job brain, combining the gravitational energy and force formula despite the fact you were reading the force formula off wikipedia, fantastic effort there. Going to explain points in case some lurker hasn't realised that reading a conversation between physicists is a foolish idea.

I'd also assume dark matter, and dark energy, with the latter being so present (23% and 73% of the mass of the universe respectively) that it can't be ignored (and the fact it travels means momentum, thus can't escape the event horizon, since gravity affects momentum, not mass), but so non-understood we can't use it either. I can't even comprehend singularities, so I wouldn't know - their creation blatantly defy the exclusion principle (two or more identical fermions can not exist in the same quantum state at the same time, black holes are when super-massive stars collapse to a single 0 dimensional point - thus an obnoxious number of particles exist at the same point). Such that this
Remus said:
Alandoril said:
Extra-dimensional matter. That accounts for the size.

Or perhaps they are universal remnants still attached to their former realities via the singularity.
This would lead to the probability that these black holes aren't just pulling in material immediately around them, but also from different points in time. Given the right location where different galaxies might intersect at different times, this could easily account for the mass requirement of an ultramassive black hole.
Is looking reasonable at this point. God, not sure if we're living in the future or we're really desperate to even count this as a possibility. I'd lean more towards matter from other dimensions, but since singularities care not for your ideas of "time" (past the event horizon, an eternity could pass outside and no time would pass inside the event horizon) and we have virtual particles borrowing energy from the future, still viable. Though we theoretically should see some effect of this - galaxies having lost mass in a non uniform way without any discernible reason.
After reading all that, it just makes me think that black holes are when the Universe decides to go 'You know what? I feel like dividing by 0 today.' Which makes me chuckle happily.
 

snave

New member
Nov 10, 2009
390
0
0
LordOfInsanity said:
After reading all that, it just makes me think that black holes are when the Universe decides to go 'You know what? I feel like dividing by 0 today.' Which makes me chuckle happily.
Mathematically, that's a pretty apt description.
 

RJ Dalton

New member
Aug 13, 2009
2,285
0
0
cjbos81 said:
I've seen bigger.
*insert yo mama joke*

"Bigger than we expected" is an accurate description for the majority of the major discoveries in astronomy lately.
 

Aaron Sylvester

New member
Jul 1, 2012
786
0
0
I'm pretty sure I haven explanation as to how those black holes got so damn huge - dark matter / dark energy.

No really, what else can it be? An unprecedented amount of mass has come out of nowhere. Must be dark matter/energy!

Of course, that "answer" only raises like a billion other questions :p
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Aaron Sylvester said:
I'm pretty sure I haven explanation as to how those black holes got so damn huge - dark matter / dark energy.

No really, what else can it be? An unprecedented amount of mass has come out of nowhere. Must be dark matter/energy!

Of course, that "answer" only raises like a billion other questions :p
It's actually simpler than that. All those black holes created by the Doctor, SG-1, and the various other sci-fi crews add up.