Why did I know that image would come up?Tipsy Giant said:They're Raping Him
That's not what made the film suck. It sucked on a very basic, film 101 level in my opinion. No vision, boring characters, stupid plot, horrific CG effects.Baby Tea said:Because people either can't see past nostalgia, or never truly 'got' what Indiana Jones was about: A tribute to the campy, over-the-top 1920s adventure comics with the all-American rugged hero. Kingdom of the Crystal Skull fits perfectly into that mold. People love the Ark causing heads to explode, but decry the nuked fridge. People love the guy ripping out a man's heart (and the man still being alive) and voodoo dolls, but scream about inter-dimensional beings.
I'll admit that Indy 4 wasn't as good number 1 or 3, but I'd put it on par with number 2.
And I can't wait for number 5!
What?!! Temple of Doom was admittedly sub-par, but The Last Crusade was epic.MorteSphere said:really, only the first one. The other two were shit.wooty said:I personally think they shouldnt of even made Kingdom in the first place, the series was already placed nicely in to hall of movie legends with the origional trilogy.
Because I I .... I, I let it happen, I just walked away, I didn't help himNot G. Ivingname said:Why did I know that image would come up?Tipsy Giant said:They're Raping Him
The difference is that the first 3 (and in my opinion only 3) movies all had to do with the occult in some way. Indiana Jones specialized in that sort of thing, the aliens were just Lucas and Spielburg taking a shit all over their previous work, just like Lucas did with the new Star Wars B.S.Billion Backs said:I have to agree with Baby Tea, for once.
As far as unrealistic things go, there's nothing special about the 4th movie compared to the original trilogy.
Aliens are still more probable then "working" voodoo dolls, ripping people's hearts out, and I'm not even going to mention a fuckload of working relics artifacts from multiple religions - there were all the Christian things, the obviously-not-Christian magic stones from Asia, and so on.
You really got no ground trying to criticize the new Indiana Jones over it's campiness, (lack of) realism, or even plot. Acting, maybe, but I don't remember it being that much worse then the original trilogy in that department.