That's exactly what I thought of too.Mr. Gency said:The world is going to end in seven days.
You have one chance.
That's what popped into my head, anyway.
Yeah...I think you misunderstood me. I was saying that down the line (years, decades, some other period of time) if a virus evolves to counter the effects of DRACO it will somehow have managed to side step caspase-mediated cell death. Therefore, when infected, a cell that harbors this virus will have less ways of dying off to protect the host and therefore could generate tumors. Of course, I got a bit overboard with it, as it probably would only happen to rapidly proliferating cells that got infected, not all cell types.smiley92 said:Didn't quite understand the point you were trying to make at the end by saying "And that virus (since this a caspase, and that route is used to tell cells to die under a lot of circumstances) will be one deadly, tumor generating Bad Mother Fucker." because the caspase sequence is something we are actually working on to STOP cancers. Tumor growth factor often aim in the caspase sequence to try and stop the mechanisms of cell death, growing ito what you called a "tumor generating Bad Mother Fucker". DRACO is trying to link the dsRNA detectino proteins with the caspases metabolic cascade to accelereate the processus of apoptosis in case of infection which is actually the OPPOSITE of being a "tumor generator". (Or maybe I just REALLY didn,t understand your point cause the rest of your post was actually pretty acurate! )shiajun said:Well, considering viral genetic code comes in all shapes and forms (single stranded DNA, double stranded DNA, sigle strande RNA, double stranded RNA, segmented double strande RNA) only a subset of them will be affected by DRACO. Granted, RNA virii tend to evolve faster and therefore outrun antiviral agents and vaccines much much faster than DNA virii.
FYI, whoever said, influenza (aka, flu) is not a retrovirus. it's a segmented RNA virus and while it creates copies of its genome in the nucleus, it never has a DNA phase. Considering it is highly contagious and airborne, and that a retrovirus has a much greater chance of generating cancer, then we'd be royally screwed.
It's a very cool idea. For those who asked DRACO would discriminate the presence of an dsRNA virus infection only by the fact that there's dsRNA in the host cell. dsRNA is not normally found at all in cells and A WHOLE LOT of organisms (plants, yeast, fungi, etc, etc) have cellular strategies that detect it and send signals that say "i'm infected, kill me", which in humans the immune system is quite content on doing. This is just aiding that system as a lot of the dsRNA virus have evolved to have proteins that cancel or inhibit that response. As far as I can see, DRACO is trying to use another death pathway to which the virus doesn't yet have a way to stop. Which doesn't mean it won't down the line. And that virus (since this a caspase, and that route is used to tell cells to die under a lot of circumstances) will be one deadly, tumor generating Bad Mother Fucker.
No, it creates clones exactly the same way as a normal human cell does. The only difference is that neither the original cell or its clones die.Jabberwock xeno said:Right, but doesn't cancer create clones the same way viruses do, by infecting other cells?E-Penguin said:It wouldn't cure cancer, as cancer is caused by human cells who accidentally becomes immortal and starts pumping out clones, not viruses.Jabberwock xeno said:Wouldn't this cure cancer, though?enzilewulf said:Good to here. Now all we need is a cure for cancer and were golden.
No more cells for it to spread to, then just zap it.
Now, if only we can have it so this gets widespread and isn't supressed by other drug companies.
That's the gist of it. Though "cancer" is really just a catch-all term for any abnormal cell growth, so you also get cells that are just multiplying abnormally quickly (without immortal parents) or cells that are simply growing in the wrong place. Things can go wrong in a lot of ways and "cancer" describes pretty much all of them.E-Penguin said:No, it creates clones exactly the same way as a normal human cell does. The only difference is that neither the original cell or its clones die.Jabberwock xeno said:Right, but doesn't cancer create clones the same way viruses do, by infecting other cells?E-Penguin said:It wouldn't cure cancer, as cancer is caused by human cells who accidentally becomes immortal and starts pumping out clones, not viruses.Jabberwock xeno said:Wouldn't this cure cancer, though?enzilewulf said:Good to here. Now all we need is a cure for cancer and were golden.
No more cells for it to spread to, then just zap it.
Now, if only we can have it so this gets widespread and isn't supressed by other drug companies.
That's what science class told me, anyway.
Besides, the way it works would cause it to kill your cells faster since HIV targets specific defense cells.frago roc said:Too bad HIV is classified as ssRNA, try harder science! =|
Not necessarily. No way could a virus develop resistance to it, based on how it works.neoman10 said:So it is, more or less, the Penicillin of viruses? Please correct me if I'm wrong.