The infamous SCAMola said:
Kukul said:
KDR_11k said:
Natural selection: It works!
No dumbass, not in this case. Nine year olds are naturally stupid, that's why they need parents to look after them. This particual kid was way more creative and brave than an avarage child, so it's actualy a waste to the gene pool that he died.
Think before you write.
Every idiot is creative and brave, that still doesn't stop them from dying though.
No, they're not. For instance, you're neither particularly creative nor brave.
I'm getting in your face on this because I don't like the /b/tardisation of the Escapist that seems to be progressing at an alarming pace. I don't like that at all; I want intelligent discussion, not knee-jerk assholery and certainly not the unimaginative sociopathy that passes for humour in all too many other Internet forums. You're not being funny, you're not being insightful, and you're not being helpful. That's not measuring up to the standards here at the Escapist, and I for one don't want to see the standards lowered because other online forums turned into cesspits without similar standards.
Lurk moar, noob, and maybe consider that when you were 9 years old you probably tried something just as dangerous and either lucked out or were stopped before things went horribly wrong. Also consider that, maybe, someday it might be your 9-year-old others are cracking Darwin jokes about.
-- Steve