[HEADING=2]What. Advertisements.[/HEADING]stewox said:Do you guys actually realize from what this SONY thing started, ... it's super simple. Sony totally disabled and prevented any further use of LINUX on the PS3 like a year or more ago, making those people angry ... that's why the FAILOVERFLOW started to get serious, that's why geohot ... that's why rage at sony , because sony did this to their self, PS3 came out with ADVERTISMENTS that it can run LINUX and was marketed OFFICIALLY.
People have always taken out the "It was advertised!" card, but I have yet to see one single iota of proof that Sony advertised the Other OS function. No TV advertisement, radio ads, magazine ads, movie ads, nothing. Every time I have asked for evidence of this statement, I am never given any and I am never given and answer. I am sick of people tossing out that statement without giving one bit of evidence to support it, it's just something people have tossed out to make them look bad. I don't care about the ethics of Sony removing Other OS, I don't care if they brought it onto themselves (though the users whos information was stolen did not bring it onto themselves), I don't care who's in the right here; I just want to know where the hell they "advertised" this damn feature?
And it's not like Nintendo isn't [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/7.284718-Anti-DRM-Group-Aims-Bricks-At-Nintendo] guilty [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/7.287328-Anti-DRM-Group-Sends-Nintendo-200-Bricks?page=1] of screwing with customers, or any other company for that matter. In comparison to the whole Sony fiasco, it's minor, sure, but it seems people are forgetting that all companies fuck with us on occasion.
Ah, and as for this, whatever. This year seems to be the year of the hacker, so I just really don't give a shit anymore. This whole ordeal has become ridiculous, to say the least, and balls-to-the-walls insane at best. Can't we just....get over this already?