Nintendo Admits It Was Hacked, but Says Users Are Safe

hawkeye52

New member
Jul 17, 2009
760
0
0
punipunipyo said:
STOP HACKING GAMES/EDUCATION sites! hack FOX, and MSNBC!!! take THEM down! do the WORLD a favor! heck, i bet instead doing the right thing, they'd be going after X-box after this... it's stupid, hackers are just gonna provoke the gaming industries to up their measures, and making us consumers and consumers suffer... more securities, more "lock ups" and more ID checks, slow update/log on speed... etc.
They've already done FOX i believe. Check what they have done so far

http://lulzsecurity.com/releases/
 

poiuppx

New member
Nov 17, 2009
674
0
0
fundayz said:
beema said:
I wish I could give them terminal cancer
exaggerated response is exaggerated
I totally agree. Why do something that could get them sympathy or could potentially be cured? I'd be more in favor of two in the head, one in the heart, and dumping them in a shallow mass grave out in the Mojave. Quick, simple, effective.
 

hawkeye52

New member
Jul 17, 2009
760
0
0
Also somebody just donated Lulsec $7200. Just one person so they now have over $7800 and still no one has been able to arrest a single member of them yet. They also have just hacked sony again i think and released some more source code from the developers network
 

danirax

New member
Jan 11, 2011
140
0
0
I bet they do it for the lulz or to get some complicated revenge on the company so as longs they are relatively harmless dont mess whit them cuz they might get serious.
you can see a good example in MMO hackers the more you fight them the more dmg and hacks they do/make.....
 

Innegativeion

Positively Neutral!
Feb 18, 2011
1,636
0
0
Jumwa said:
Sounds more like a group of amateur hackers weren't able to accomplish anything, so they felt making up excuses for it would save some face.

These groups work by targeting vulnerable sites that they can get into and stir up trouble in easily. It's unlikely they're capable of doing anything more than that.
Yeah I would go for this. Their intrusion and sony I'd chock up to more faulty security, as Sony has shown to have that before.

The fact that they got flicked away without getting anything worth anything, I'd give more credit to Nintendo, professional as they are, for that.
 

Jumwa

New member
Jun 21, 2010
641
0
0
hawkeye52 said:
Thats the attack that anonymous did a while back against HBGary internet security. Lulsec did the nintendo one as a warm up to the FBI affiliate attack against infraguard.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/06/lulzsec_fbi_affiliates_hack/

http://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2011/02/07/hbgary-federal-hacked-and-exposed-by-anonymous/
Well shame on me for not brushing up on my silly hacker groups. Seems I was wrong then. Thanks for the clarification.
 

Cadapalo

New member
Jun 8, 2010
75
0
0
CardinalPiggles said:
thats it, debit card information deleted from my Xbox account...

a big fucking middle finger to those hacker cunts.
If you are serious about what you say and have already done so would you mind telling me how I can do the same. Microsoft doesn't make it easy to delete credit card info without having to sit through an hour on the phone talking to a rep to get something so simple done.

OT: Have these people nothing better to do than hacking into Sony and others alike. I'm all for the "lulz" but this stuffs getting out of hand. Why not use those skills for something more useful rather than keep people from enjoying their games.
 

killamanhunter

New member
Mar 24, 2009
204
0
0
Cadapalo said:
CardinalPiggles said:
thats it, debit card information deleted from my Xbox account...

a big fucking middle finger to those hacker cunts.
If you are serious about what you say and have already done so would you mind telling me how I can do the same. Microsoft doesn't make it easy to delete credit card info without having to sit through an hour on the phone talking to a rep to get something so simple done.

OT: Have these people nothing better to do than hacking into Sony and others alike. I'm all for the "lulz" but this stuffs getting out of hand. Why not use those skills for something more useful rather than keep people from enjoying their games.
Yeah! Remember that story back a few days where M16 hacked Al Qaeda? There's hacking used for good! and cupcakes...

OT: Go ahead do whatever you want, as long as we don't lose PSN again thanks to you morons and your "crusade for lulz" then go ahead. But seriously guys, just let the people at Sony get back to work and let us enjoy the internet again without a story every day about some retarded organization going out and about thinking they're the good guys fighting for us after taking our information and showing it to every nutjob out there.
 

elilupe

New member
Jun 1, 2009
533
0
0
Lulzsec seems to me like a group of hackers who don't have power in real life, and because of that decide to use their superior hacking skills to be jerks on the internet, where they have a power that is recognized by the media and in turn gets them recognized.

It is, however, worrying if it is true that they broke in to Nintendo just as a joke.
 

Continuity

New member
May 20, 2010
2,053
0
0
CardinalPiggles said:
thats it, debit card information deleted from my Xbox account...

a big fucking middle finger to those hacker cunts.
Hmmm.. I wonder if that card information isn't still stored somewhere in Microsoft's database... really wouldn't surprise me.

I srsly hope no one goes after steam though, and more so I hope that steam has decent security in place and a secure, encrypted, segmented database so that the damage of any breach will be limited... Hope you're listening Valve!!
 

Harry Mason

New member
Mar 7, 2011
617
0
0
Here's another Twitter quote from Lulzsec

"Things we would never harm: Sega, Nintendo, Neopets, Old Spice Guy, anyone that owns a boat for the sole purpose of being a pirate."

NEOPETS? Seriously? How are 8-year-olds hacking anything at all? I hope these twits get caught and get their asses handed to them.
 

weirdee

Swamp Weather Balloon Gas
Apr 11, 2011
2,634
0
0
dragongit said:
OH ho ho... So Sony wasn't the only one attacked. Granted they didn't loose info like Sony had, people cannot simply clame Sony's security was lax. It still wasn't foolproof and needed updating, but Nintendo isn't exacly invincible either.

Makes me wonder what the situation with Microsoft is. Though honestly, people hack personal computers all the time, so they probably wouldn't notice the difference.
Uh....yeah, they can still claim it. The main complaint isn't the intrusion, but the lack of internal safeguards...Sony continues to show that their passwords aren't really that good in the first place (using your name and default account information? geez), and their information protection fails basic security standards which should have been there ages ago. Nintendo didn't really lose anything and they fixed the hole immediately.

Of course nobody's foolproof, but the difference is made when your information is either laid bare for the taking, or simply not present at all and therefore inaccessible by nature. Nintendo's ridiculous culture of privacy holds them back from their full potential, but it has some upsides.
 

YunikoYokai5

New member
Jun 16, 2010
100
0
0
Alright, as a Sony user, all Xbox users have my prayer that your information is safe from hacking. No one, other than the handful of extreme xbox fanboys who were rubbing it in when our information was taken, deserves to go through the hassle of cancelling debit/credit cards and wondering if you should make a new e-mail address only for your consoles in order to protect yourself.

This 'Lulzsec' (which sounds like a bad drug personally) say they wouldn't harm Nintendo any further than they already have. Surprised, seeing as the 3DS ToS say they are allowed to brick your 3DS at any time. Well lets hope security takes a sharp increase and they can't hack into anything and just die in the background.
 

Firehound

is a trap!
Nov 22, 2010
352
0
0
dragongit said:
OH ho ho... So Sony wasn't the only one attacked. Granted they didn't loose info like Sony had, people cannot simply clame Sony's security was lax. It still wasn't foolproof and needed updating, but Nintendo isn't exacly invincible either.

Makes me wonder what the situation with Microsoft is. Though honestly, people hack personal computers all the time, so they probably wouldn't notice the difference.
The big difference

Nintendo= No information lost
Sony= EVERYTHING STOLEN. YES EVERYTHING. THEY EVEN STOLE HOWARD STRINGER'S DOG. IF HE HAS ONE.

Seriously. If your hacked it happens. Losing every bit of personal information your supposed to keep safe is not. It's like if the bank guarded it's vaults with a bucket of water and a wal mart greeter. You wouldn't leave money there. Sony should eat crow.

Sony is more permeable then swiss cheese. Stop making comparisons between them and sites that understand security better then I do. Which is to say websites with a security department.
 

Twilight_guy

Sight, Sound, and Mind
Nov 24, 2008
7,131
0
0
So now the group is not only dicks but nostalgia blinded prejudice dicks... fantastic. Next thing you know they're going to start posting about the master race and supporting Hitler with there hacks... for the lulz.
 

L33tMarvin

New member
Feb 18, 2009
195
0
0
it seems nintendo just trolled sony"we got hack but we didnt lose any real personal info"I think during the sony conference they will bring the guys who hack them and bring on stage just so they sony fansboys can crucifix them on will the show is going on
 

Jumplion

New member
Mar 10, 2008
7,873
0
0
hawkeye52 said:
Jumplion said:
stewox said:
Do you guys actually realize from what this SONY thing started, ... it's super simple. Sony totally disabled and prevented any further use of LINUX on the PS3 like a year or more ago, making those people angry ... that's why the FAILOVERFLOW started to get serious, that's why geohot ... that's why rage at sony , because sony did this to their self, PS3 came out with ADVERTISMENTS that it can run LINUX and was marketed OFFICIALLY.
[HEADING=2]What. Advertisements.[/HEADING]

People have always taken out the "It was advertised!" card, but I have yet to see one single iota of proof that Sony advertised the Other OS function. No TV advertisement, radio ads, magazine ads, movie ads, nothing. Every time I have asked for evidence of this statement, I am never given any and I am never given and answer. I am sick of people tossing out that statement without giving one bit of evidence to support it, it's just something people have tossed out to make them look bad. I don't care about the ethics of Sony removing Other OS, I don't care if they brought it onto themselves (though the users whos information was stolen did not bring it onto themselves), I don't care who's in the right here; I just want to know where the hell they "advertised" this damn feature?
theres an interview here with a sony rep at the E3 before the PS3 was released

http://www.qj.net/qjnet/playstation-3/its-official-the-ps3-will-support-linux-and-homebrew.html

Also since no other console has ever supported linux and sony went through the time and expense to say they will support it and produced software to do so its pretty obvious that they wanted people to use it to begin with otherwise what would be the point of putting it in.
Yes, because saying something in an interview constitutes as an advertisement? If that's the best anyone can come up with, especially considering that the user I quoted specifically stated that they "officially marketed" OtherOS, then that's just pitiful to be honest (not attacking you personally). Plenty of companies say they will support this and that, I remember in an interview Resident Evil 5 was supposed to have a sun-heat system or something like that yet it never made it to the cut, is that "false advertising"?

Why would they remove a feature? Simple, didn't work out. Cost them resources they would have rather spent elsewhere. Allegedly a security weakpoint. Low usage. Whatever. Not saying what they did was justified or not, but if there's one argument that I cannot understand it is the "it was advertised!" argument.