No longer needing to sleep or no longer disposing your human waste, Which do you prefer?

Tayh

New member
Apr 6, 2009
775
0
0
Agema said:
Who on earth believes that our capitalist system and bosses will take a look at another 8 hours potential economic production and think "Mm, you know what, let's leave them to enjoy it as leisure time"?
Countries with functional unions? :p
Might be cheaper to hire a new employee rather than paying for overtime, if the productive result is the same in the end anyway.

Sign me up for not sleeping, too. Doing night shifts at my work, so that means I'd have time and energy to do stuff during the day instead of just sleeping.
 

Dalisclock

Making lemons combustible again
Legacy
Escapist +
Feb 9, 2008
11,244
7,023
118
A Barrel In the Marketplace
Country
Eagleland
Gender
Male
I rather like sleeping or dozing off, and coffee exists to stave that off if needed.

I'd be super happy if I never had to pull over to use the bathroom again, or hunt desperately for a public toliet because I really have to go, or break off something important or just not easily to walk away from to go to the bathroom.

Not to mention, not ever having to clean the toilet again would be great.
 

Agema

You have no authority here, Jackie Weaver
Legacy
Mar 3, 2009
8,598
5,963
118
Silvanus said:
I think that during a working week, I don't really get enough sleep (about 6.5 hours a day, 7 if I'm lucky, and then more when I'm off the next day).

It doesn't impair my ability to work, and I don't need nearly as much caffeine as some people do. Mostly, it just saps my energy and makes physical exertion difficult.
Sleep need varies from person to person. Adults will usually be in the range 6-9h per day, with most 7-8h. I would suggest anyone regularly getting under 5h a day or needing over 10h may have an underlying medical problem. Anyone who tells you they only need 4h sleep a day is full of shit - at best, if they really are, they'll be operating way below maximum. If you regularly sleep 6.5-7h but tend to sleep more when not busy, that suggests when you're working you're getting a little on the low side. Obviously, we can take less sleep for short periods - it's perfectly normal to under-sleep during the working week and catch up at the weekend, for instance, although it will lead to tiredness by the end of the week.

You can of course change that and alter your routine to get to sleep earlier, and there are all sorts of techniques and "sleep hygiene" processes to help. In practice, most people simply prefer the way they do it, because there are computer games, socialising, TV etc. that they want to do rather than get an extra hour of sleep by going to bed earlier. What certainly would be a problem is insomnia - going to bed and not getting to sleep.

I don't think the 16h-on 8h-off model of our days is probably what we evolved to do. I suspect humans slept - or intensely relaxed - during the day, probably midday - early afternoon, much like the Spanish siesta. There is a "blip" in the circadian rhythm of reduced wake drive around this point.

That's what I remember from studying psychology in school, too. I think the runner up was 9 days, and for some reason, they were worse off than the one who stayed up for 11.

IIRC, the 9-day stint person started having severe hallucinations and paranoia and such.
Yes, they very likely would. Chances are they were also suffering stuff like random neuropathic pain and cardiovascular (usually vasoconstrictive) abnormalities as well. There may be all sorts of variations in how people handle lack of sleep; genetics, general fitness, levels of activity during sleeplessness, etc. If they're chugging caffeine like crazy /andor other stimulants as well, I can see why in a few occasions people just drop dead.
 

Kyrian007

Nemo saltat sobrius
Legacy
Mar 9, 2010
2,567
650
118
Kansas
Country
U.S.A.
Gender
Male
If it is just me, I'd probably eliminate (heh) the need to sleep. I'd have more free time and because it isn't a society wide thing I wouldn't tell anyone and be expected to work longer hours. And the extra hours for me would be free time when most other people have free time, as a 3rd shift worker that's when I sleep now. I could have a normal life again.

And if it were everyone... probably get rid of pooping. Sanitation is still a problem in many parts of the world and this would solve many of the problems. Downside, poop humor would go away. I would miss that. Could we still cut hilariously loud and smelly farts? This would take away one of the hazards inherent there as well.
 

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Feb 9, 2012
18,530
3,053
118
I love sleeping but an extra 8 hours to the day essentially increases your lifespan by 50%.

Samtemdo8 said:
Well if we no longer need sleep, we don't need beds anymore.
What about the sex?


the December King said:
This should be a poll...
... but polls are still broken.
 

Xprimentyl

Made you look...
Legacy
Aug 13, 2011
6,258
4,533
118
Plano, TX
Country
United States
Gender
Male
You ?get rid of sleep? types are insane! Which of you, after a nice long sleep, has ever woken up and been like ?that was a complete waste of time.? And which of you, after sitting on the toilet until your feet go numb and stinking up a ten cubic-foot area has ever been like ?yeah, that was quality time right there.?

Unless ?never sleeping again? comes with a substantial increase in resources without having to use all the ?extra time? to do additional work for said increase, the extra time would be for naught. Extra free time means extra time spent with the finite resources you have for your typical/ideal ?16-hours productive, 8-hours rest? daily schedule: spending more, eating more (and subsequently pooping and peeing more,) you?ll go through various media more quickly requiring you spend on them more frequently to take up additional time, etc. The constant quest to stimulate yourself would itself be expensive and exhausting while simultaneously being unable to actually exhaust you or pay for itself without negating the purpose of the newly acquired free time; it?d be a nightmare. Now, please take a moment to reflect on the cogent and rational argument I?ve put forth and change your mind.
 

Neurotic Void Melody

Bound to escape
Legacy
Jul 15, 2013
4,953
6
13
I find poop time undeniably inconvenient and often a bit shameful during the moments in someone else's abode when a bowel movement starts to growl aggressively with the relentless determination of an incorrectly incarcerated prisoner laying eyes upon their one chance at grasping sweet long lost freedom. I do not want to make your lovely home smell bad, sorry!

Sleep provides a lot of insane dreams useful for inspiration. It is also an effective method of escape from some depression but not always. Can be a bit of a double edged sword with intense dreams, like hallucinogens perhaps, but with at least the chance to back out into the familiar horrors of reality instead.
 

Kae

That which exists in the absence of space.
Legacy
Nov 27, 2009
5,792
712
118
Country
The Dreamlands
Gender
Lose 1d20 sanity points.
I would prefer not having to do either and basically becoming an android, even if that costed the need to eat.

But of those 2 not sleeping would provide me with way more time, plus since I'm already an insomniac that would prevent me from feeling super tired when I'm already unable to sleep, not to mention that would mean more free time in general, but having physiological necessities in general is very inconvenient.
 
Oct 22, 2011
1,223
0
0
Even though i like to sleep, not having to do it would save everyone soooo much extra time...

On the other, not having to use toilet would be beneficial to enviroment, and redeem my kidney problems obsolete.

Decisions, decisions...