i have to agree, the premise of the dicussion was flawed, it should have been "picard or sisko".Soviet Heavy said:Sisko is the best Captain. He punched out a space god, became a space god, started a war with the Dominion and beat the shit out of them, and built the first Federation Warship.
This.portal_cat said:Picard, he took an arrow to the shoulder to prove he wasn't a god.
To be fair that's just bad writing, it's a trope of 'beat up the toughest guy to prove how badass the baddie is'. The fact that it is always Worf means he's supposed to be the toughest.el_kabong said:
You win this thread, sir. Well played.rhizhim said:Hitchmeister said:No love for Archer? I'm kidding. I know there's no love at all for Archer.
who said there is no love for me? because i will shoot them with this gun until they love me. like seriously.
Roddenberry gave Behr and Piller the go ahead to make DS9 before he died. He okayed the show.mattttherman3 said:You know, if Gene Roddenberry were alive when DS9 was first thought up, no way would there be that bullshit religious aspect of the emissary. That was so fucking stupid, those episodes were GARBAGE.
OT why the hell did no one mention captain archer?! HE WAS BAWSE!!!
I'd totally champion Pine!Kirk. Not because I really like him better than Shatner, but because everyone is so butthurt about him, when I think he did a good job, considering all the circumstances in the first rebooted Star Trek movie, the most dire of which was a bad script.Hitchmeister said:Hopefully in a few months we can revisit this as a debate between Shatner Kirk and Pine Kirk. Haven't had enough Pine Kirk to really say anything yet. With luck the next movie will be good enough for someone to consider championing him.
I believe you are incorrect, Archer created the first alliances and treaties that eventually became the Federation.Dan said:[Kirk] built the Federation