North Carolina Considers New Online Taxes

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
North Carolina Considers New Online Taxes


The state of North Carolina [http://www.visitnc.com/] is examining the practicality of imposing a sales tax on digital downloads in order to help tackle its $2 billion budget deficit.

It's not about to happen anytime soon, but a legislative committee is considering how to modernize the state's tax code in order to bring them into the online era. "We used to think of everything in terms of being tangible," said Democrat Representative Paul Luebke [http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/gascripts/members/viewMember.pl?nUserID=63&sChamber=H] of the North Carolina General Assembly. "Nobody thought of how you could possibly download anything."

"If you buy a book in a bookstore, you're going to have to pay sales tax on it," he added. "If you're downloading a book from a book seller, you should have to pay sales tax on that as well."

Researchers have said that taxing downloads of music, movies, books and software could generate about $12 million over the next fiscal year, a tiny portion of the $2 billion shortfall the state is currently looking at. North Carolina Technology Association [http://www.nctechnology.org/] CEO Brooks Raiford also expressed "concern" about the idea, saying, "The consumer is already very highly taxed, the economy is stretched."

Numerous questions surround any possible implementation of such a plan. Would it apply only to retailers in North Carolina, or would sellers in other states be expected to collect - and pay - the sales tax when selling to customers in the state? Similarly, would out-of-state customers of N.C.-based businesses be expected to pay? And how will tech-savvy consumers, many with access to "alternate methods of acquisition," react to the idea of paying tax on an intangible product like DLC?

The evolution of digital life has largely outpaced both criminal and civil legislation, and while laws - tax laws included - do need to be updated and brought in line with contemporary society, a ham-handed cash grab is the wrong approach to take, a point touched on by Raiford. "All we're asking is that those considerations be taken carefully and that the industry be asked for their input as the legislation is finalized," he said.


Permalink
 

mattttherman3

New member
Dec 16, 2008
3,105
0
0
Why don't the congress members or NC just take a pay cut, we all know they are not in session year round, maybe 5$ less an hour?
 

cleverlymadeup

New member
Mar 7, 2008
5,256
0
0
wasn't there like a federal law put in place saying "no internet tax" a while ago? i think they probly need to look at what money is being spent and cut that, like salaries

i think that cutting salaries for higher ups is a really good thing and not just in the government but in business too, especially if you are profit sharing
 

Ago Iterum

New member
Dec 31, 2007
1,366
0
0
I'm sure if THIER shit was constantly taxed it would be different. You know they're rarely online, only once in a while to try and get their kick of internet bingo and feet.
 

ellimist337

New member
Sep 30, 2008
500
0
0
And this in turn will just drive more and more people to download things for free (illegally). I understand that charging sales tax for this is just like charging sales tax on a CD in a store, and that it will make money, but for what little money that is? I would hope they could find a better way.
 

level250geek

New member
Jan 8, 2009
184
0
0
I live in NC. I so don't want this to be passed. In a bad, bad way I don't want this to be passed.

We're in debt. Great. Wonderful. We need to get out of it. No arguments there. But when you take MORE money from the people, that's LESS money they can spend everywhere else.

I don't know about you all, but I still buy plenty of things from good, old-fashioned brick-and-mortar stores and those goods are taxed and taxed well.