Ultratwinkie said:
you do realize "send the brits in first" has been the most used US military tactic ever since WWII right? you also forget that war was never you vs. them. there is always an intelligence war behind the scenes. sabotage, assassinations, "accidents" happening to important installations, etc. zerg rushes only lead to failures. you need to "prep" an area to invasion. rushing in like a blind bull can lead to big losses and it doesn't matter how powerful a military is. germany rushed in at WWII, and they lost their most experienced pilots because of it. so lets say we find a nuke stockpile, we can send someone in to set a charge then POOF, no more nukes. since north korea isn't known for their "quality" nukes, it looks like an accident. granted civilians will get caught in the blast, but wouldn't it just prove to kim-jon-midget that nukes are not to be played with? no invasion, no need to launch our nukes. they have a nuke stockpile, why not pull a megaton and give it some "motivation"?
Ugg, might want to read up on your history, USA couldn't send us in first in WWII considering they were neutral and not even allies till December 1941 (so they couldn't "send the Brits in first" as they had no say in the matter). I don't know what you mean, there was no "send the Brits frst" in the Korean war 1950-53, Brits stayed out of Vietnam, were pushed to support role in the First Gulf War, and so on. I think you're talking a little bit of bollocks there with just some weasel words about WWII drawing far more on prejudiced impressions than actual facts.
Also, don't expect special forces and sabotage/assassinations to make much difference here. you seem to be misunderstanding the real-world application of special forces and how they are depicted in movies and video games where they are more like unstoppable killing machines, one man armies. Unfortunately it is not like that.
Really, people like Sam Fisher don't exist. Or at least if they do, they don't sneak into heavily guarded facilities without raising the alarm. If they did then the 2003 invasion of Iraq would never have happened. Yes, special forces are good for raiding small, low profile targets but NOT highly defended facilities where nuclear weapons are held.
Special forces are mainly for assassinating guerilla leaders, rescuing hostages, coordinating with local forces. They only way they are going to help find and destroy nuclear bombs is working ALONG SIDE an invading force that ties up the larger NK army-groups that would easily hunt down and destroy any special-forces consignment that is poking around. And even then the best special forces could likely do is direct a precision guided munition. Why in the hell would they actually set a nuclear bomb to undergo full detonation!??! They could so easily be caught, how could they justify the fallout and civilian casualties with "oooooh, it'll teach Kim Jong ill a lesson".
Well what if Kim figures out that American Special Forces are responsible rather than an accident? Nukes don't just accidentally explode, at least not full detonation, there is a long chain of events that must come together for that which makes an accident even for sloppy North Korean forces HUGELY unlikely and that would be obvious to all sides. If a nuclear bomb goes off, then likely it was set off.
Nukes won't be in a stockpile anyway, likely they will be deployed and their exact location an extremely well kept secret inside one of the most secretive states in the world. I.e. if they can't find Bin Laden they won't find where NK would hide any nukes. One will be on a submarine, another buried near the border, another at a missile site, another in a plane on an airfield ready to be launched. They aren't going to go to all this expense making these nukes and just put them all in a warehouse with only a few guards milling around! That's Hollywood bullshit.
Look, the White House couldn't even cover up a blowjob, they are not going to be able to keep secret they they deliberately sabotaged NK nuclear bombs to detonated on North Korean soil! Hell, what President would even sign off on it?