NSA's SKYNET Program May Be Killing Innocents, and Tested in MMOs

PatrickJS

New member
Jun 8, 2015
409
0
0
NSA's SKYNET Program May Be Killing Innocents, and Tested in MMOs

//cdn.themis-media.com/media/global/images/library/deriv/1279/1279329.jpg

The National Security Agency's SKYNET program, which uses metadata and learning algorithms to select targets for drone strikes, may be targeting thousands of innocent people.

The NSA's dramatically-titled SKYNET program was touted as a learning algorithm, a pseudo-intelligence that uses meta-data from cell phone records to create profiles of suspected terrorists. Now, close examination of documents leaked by Edward Snowden, and new declarations from whistle-blowers, are painting a bleaker picture: the program's chance for false positives is frighteningly high, and may have lead to the deaths of thousands of innocent people under the assumption they had extremist connections.

The documents released include slide presentations of SKYNET's methods and successes (here [https://theintercept.com/document/2015/05/08/skynet-applying-advanced-cloud-based-behavior-analytics/]), from which much of this information was gleamed.

SKYNET would guide predator drone strikes, as well as death squads, based on the data it acquired - so just what kind of air-tight information could lead it to point out a person as a terrorist?

That largely comes down to social networks and location. Among the many points of data SKYNET examined were the movements of suspects (and suspects, to SKYNET, can include the entire population of a country such as Pakistan): travelling to or from a region with high terrorist activity, especially if the timing lines up such that you arrive just before or after a major event.

[gallery=5732]

A person's social network also comes into play. At the risk of oversimplification, if person A calls or texts person B, who has already been flagged by SKYNET, person A will likely be flagged by the algorithm, as well.

Trying to protect one's own privacy also tips off SKYNET. A suspect that takes the battery out of their phone, changes a SIM card, and so forth, will be considered suspicious. Even turning the phone off can be seen as a way to evade detection.

One person touted as a "confirmed member of Al-Qa'ida" is a man named Ahmed Zaidan, who fit the profile of a terrorist perfectly, according to the NSA's standards. Zaidan travelled to and from locations where terrorist activity was known to occur, and had numerous phone conversations with known extremists. The thing is, Ahmed Zaidan is Al-Jazeera's Islamabad Bureau Chief - a journalist who covers terrorist activity and communicates directly with the factions involved.

Already, SKYNET's methods seem to break down. What's more, the algorithm required a base set of known extremists to be fed into it in order to develop its own profile of what an extremist might act like. The problem is that "known extremists" is actually a vanishingly small-sized sample, and the NSA supplemented the number by adding "suspected extremists" to the list.

On top of that, the program may have been in development for more than a decade, and its methods possibly tested on gamers.

The Escapist spoke to a former DARPA consultant, speaking under conditions of anonymity. He stated that the Department of Defense has been working on terrorist detection algorithms since at least 2000. As early as 2001, they knew they had a problem with false positives. The project the former consultant was involved with was an attempt to test those algorithms against massively multiplayer games. It's unclear how successful this attempt was, but gamers may have been the guinea pigs for these algorithms. (Note: The Escapist was not able to independently verify these allegations.)

It's unknown now, and may remain so forever, how many false positives SKYNET delivered, and how many of those were acted on by people with the power to.

For most of us, SKYNET seems far removed from our lives - but algorithms increasingly infiltrate our day-to-day. Would we notice when the results of these algorithms shift from being targeted marketing, to targeted arrests, or worse? It's a scary thought, and maybe it's naive. I'll leave that up to the Escapists; please, comment and share your thoughts on the matter.

Source: Ars Techinca [http://arstechnica.co.uk/security/2016/02/the-nsas-skynet-program-may-be-killing-thousands-of-innocent-people/]

Permalink
 

Diablo1099_v1legacy

Doom needs Yoghurt, Badly
Dec 12, 2009
9,732
0
0
...They seriously had to call it Skynet, didn't they?

Come on, even people who haven't watched those movies know that's just asking for trouble!

OT: Jesus Christ America, are you TRYING to become a nation of super villains? What the actual fuck guys?!
 

Kameburger

Turtle king
Apr 7, 2012
574
0
0
Who THE FUCK calls their "We're gonna rain death from the sky" program SKYNET... Like what possesses you to do that? You could theoretically have called this anything. Evil sky no people planes death program... at least that way when they integrate AI into the mix, we'll have an appropriate name for the thing that kills us, instead of everyone making jokes about how we should call Arnold...
 

rcs619

New member
Mar 26, 2011
627
0
0
The Rogue Wolf said:
This isn't a Taco News post.

Why isn't this a Taco News post?

Why is this something that is actually happening?!
Don't worry. The Obama administration actually classifies all "military-aged males within a combat zone" as potential 'enemy-combatants.' The official government stats will claim many fewer civilian deaths.

Seriously though, if we do not know *specifically* who we're trying to kill, we should not order a freaking assassination attempt. That should not be some sort of insurmountabe barrier for the US government/military. If you want to murder the hell out of a *legitimate military target* with an anti-tank missile fired from a flying death-robot I don't think most people will have an issue with that. But all this BS with signature strikes (strikes where they literally have no specific target and they don't actually know who it is that they're killing) and killing people based on meta-data has got to stop. If you want to unilaterally execute someone, you gotta do the legwork beforehand to make sure 1: That you who you're freaking killing, and 2: That you don't also murder 30 civilians who happen to be around him at the time (hellfire missiles are not what you'd call surgical-grade tools).

Anything else is, at best tactically unsound and a waste of materials. At worst, it becomes some Doctor Doom, cartoon-supervillain shit that only creates more enemies for the US in the long run. Every single case of 'collateral damage' is someone else who may join al qaeda, or ISIS, or whoever else promises them the chance to kill the sumbitches that blew up their grandma with an anti-tank missile while she was rooting around in her garden (this is an actual case that has been confirmed to have happened).
 
Sep 24, 2008
2,461
0
0
I can't seem to place where I know that drone from.

Oh. Oh yeah.



It's the great grandfather to this

The obvious stupid joke aside... I don't care if some geek thought this is funny. We already have a fundamental mistrust with government stemming from Wikileaks, Snowdon, Patriot Act, Hell, Apple flatout coming public that the government wanted backdoors on the hush.

And you fucking mock us with the name?

This is almost a "Let them eat cake" moment.
 

KoudelkaMorgan

New member
Jul 31, 2009
1,365
0
0
I dislike it when a news story says that they spoke to "perfectly reputable source full of juicy intel X who wishes to remain anonymous."

However I spoke to a professor of ethics in journalism at a prestigious Ivy League university, who also wishes to remain anonymous, and they assured me that everything is perfectly verified and that no one ever ever makes up unverifiable statements from unnamed sources about clickbait worthy news. Especially not the Escapist, as they are most known for their close governmental ties and hard hitting exposes on government overreach and not say quizzes to determine which Undertale character you'd pretend to makes small talk with in an elevator..

Asinine hyperbole aside, is this surprising to anyone? If you vote Trump you are essentially promoting an Austin Powers villain to run COBRA. Or HYDRA, idk which would be more appropriate.
 

Ldude893

New member
Apr 2, 2010
4,114
0
0
So basically, it's Project Insight from Captain America: The Winter Soldier with the name of the big-bad from Terminator slapped on. And people in the American government thought this was a good idea.
 

EHKOS

Madness to my Methods
Feb 28, 2010
4,815
0
0
A bit off-topic, but why is Ars Technica popping up all over the place as a site for technological news? I just saw it spring up about a week ago taking up most of my Google feed on my phone.

OT: I mean, what are the odds that the program we actually NAME SKYNET will be the prophesied SKYNET? That would just be silly. IT'D BE SILLY RIGHT? RIGHT?!
*runs from the room to read something intelligent and logical*
 

008Zulu_v1legacy

New member
Sep 6, 2009
6,019
0
0
Ldude893 said:
So basically, it's Project Insight from Captain America: The Winter Soldier with the name of the big-bad from Terminator slapped on. And people in the American government thought this was a good idea.
Project Insight targeted exactly the people Hydra wanted dead. Skynet seems to have a Scorched Earth mentality.
 

rcs619

New member
Mar 26, 2011
627
0
0
KoudelkaMorgan said:
I dislike it when a news story says that they spoke to "perfectly reputable source full of juicy intel X who wishes to remain anonymous."
That does always kind of suck, but after the way Assange, Snowden and Manning were treated (say what you want about them as individuals, but they did leak information that the American public *should* have been made aware of)... yeah, there's no way I'd ever put my name out there. Whisterblower protection laws seem to exist in name only nowadays. The Obama administration has charged more people under the espionage act than any other president in US history.

Asinine hyperbole aside, is this surprising to anyone? If you vote Trump you are essentially promoting an Austin Powers villain to run COBRA. Or HYDRA, idk which would be more appropriate.
Pretty much. Obama was supposed to be the liberal candidate (what a joke that turned out to be) and look at all of this crap he's encouraged and expanded under his watch. For those who are banking on Hilary, keep in mind that she always campaigned as "Like Obama, but more conservative on military/security issues," so yeah, not much hope on that front either I'm afraid.
 

Fox12

AccursedT- see you space cowboy
Jun 6, 2013
4,828
0
0
Diablo1099 said:
...They seriously had to call it Skynet, didn't they?

Come on, even people who haven't watched those movies know that's just asking for trouble!

OT: Jesus Christ America, are you TRYING to become a nation of super villains? What the actual fuck guys?!
Now, would a nation of super villains put this on a spy satellite?

 

RJ Dalton

New member
Aug 13, 2009
2,285
0
0
Wasn't an algorithm like this the central plot device of Winter Soldier? I'm not the only one who sees that connection, am I? And it's known that Zola's Algorithm was the reason why the military turned Marvel Studios down for a request for military subsidy money.

It just doesn't suggest good things to me.
 

Parasondox

New member
Jun 15, 2013
3,229
0
0
Skynet? Skynet? SKY FUCKING NET?!?! You know what USA? Just build the Deathstar already and get it over and done with. I know you are working towards it so you might as well do it.

Jesus H. Christ. The thrust for power is just sickening and disgusting.
 

Leg End

Romans 12:18
Oct 24, 2010
2,932
47
53
Country
United States
Because we toootally have a legitimate reason to have a network of learning killing machines flying in sovereign airspace and just terminating whoever gets automatically put on this list.

If anyone nation even comes forward and says the US is sending flying terminators to murder their citizens, what the fuck are you going to do? You named it SKYNET. You're admitting that's the fucking purpose.
Parasondox said:
Skynet? Skynet? SKY FUCKING NET?!?! You know what USA? Just build the Deathstar already and get it over and done with. I know you are working towards it so you might as well do it.

Jesus H. Christ. The thrust for power is just sickening and disgusting.
I'd be less ashamed if they actually did build an Ion Cannon network. At least then it'd be admitting they just want to glass people.
 

Ender910_v1legacy

New member
Oct 22, 2009
209
0
0
Oh, but no, we couldn't possibly believe those "crazy" conspiracy nuts that have been talking about this sort of thing for years, right?

Bloody hell. Is this really what it takes to wake a few people up? The U.S. military using movie references as code-names for their overzealous military projects?
 

Bat Vader

New member
Mar 11, 2009
4,996
0
0
I feel like them naming it Skynet was meant to be a joke and I feel like people are taking the name more seriously than it needs to be.

There's no way they named it Skynet by accident. That's what makes it funny.
 

Neverhoodian

New member
Apr 2, 2008
3,832
0
0
This is utterly sickening and a stark warning about the dangers when those in power abuse technology for their own ends.

At this point, I'd say the NSA is no better than the terrorists they claim to be fighting. They may even be worse, in fact. At least terrorists don't try to hide their true motives under a false pretense of patriotism while trampling on the very rights and ideals they claim to protect.

There, I said it. Now to wait for the men in suits to whisk me away for tortu-I mean, "enhanced interrogation."