Obama Calls for Reforms to NSA Surveillance Programs

roseofbattle

News Room Contributor
Apr 18, 2011
2,306
0
0
Obama Calls for Reforms to NSA Surveillance Programs

While Obama seeks to curb NSA authority, he insists that surveillance is necessary and a part of the country's history.

President Obama has announced his reforms and plans for NSA intelligence operations in a speech broadcast today. In his speech, Obama said his administration will continue to monitor other governments, and the NSA will need to obtain a court's permission before accessing phone data. That data will also be moved out of the government's hands.

Obama said the NSA program does not examine the phone records of average Americans. He announced he will restrict current NSA data collection efforts that collect information beyond an individual target.

US intelligence agencies will also face sharper restrictions on eavesdropping on leaders of foreign allies

The NSA's aggressive practices of surveillance do not abuse its authority, Obama said, and these policies are necessary to national security. Surveillance has been a part of the United States' activities since its independence from the United Kingdom, the president said. He pointed to Paul Revere as an example of surveillance that aided the country. Sustained intelligence gathering has grown out of necessity over concerns over the spread of nuclear weapons.

Obama was critical of wiretaps without warrants when he served as a US Senator, but he says surveillance is necessary in conducting foreign policy. The president, the director of the NSA, and the attorney general will annually review their policies to regularly scrutinize their work. Currently, the NSA follows all protocols and does not abuse the law, according to the president.

The NSA does not listen in to private phone calls or emails, he continued. Data on the length of calls, numbers, and the time the phone calls take place comprise the majority of telephone records.

Regarding Edward Snowden, ex-NSA contractor who leaked many details about the NSA's activities, the president said he will not "dwell on Mr. Snowden's actions or motivations."

"I will say that our nation's defense depends in part on the fidelity of those entrusted with our nation's secrets," he elaborated. "If any individual who objects to government policy can take it in their own hands to publicly disclose classified information, then we will never be able to keep our people safe, or conduct foreign policy. Moreover, the sensational way in which these disclosures have come out has often shed more heat than light, while revealing methods to our adversaries that could impact our operations in ways that we may not fully understand for years to come."

Moving forward, Obama will establish a panel of advocates outside of government. This panel will ask the attorney general and the NSA director to institute reforms. He is also willing to work with Congress on the matter. He hopes that his review will give Americans "greater confidence their rights are being protected."

"More work will be needed in the future," he concluded. "This debate will make us strong. In this time of change, the United States of America will have to lead."

Source: BBC [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-25781939]


Permalink
 

Erttheking

Member
Legacy
Oct 5, 2011
10,845
1
3
Country
United States
So basically, he just said to the entire world, "Hey other countries! We're still gonna be spying on you!" Granted, this reform is a step in the right direction (if he's telling the truth) but this feels kinda half assed. A warrant will be needed? Good. That's, you know, the way it's fucking SUPPOSED to be. And it's part of our history? Um...pardon me Mr. President...when has that ever been a good fucking justification for fucking ANYTHING!?

Oh, and in this time of change, America will have to lead? Is that why Germany had to FORCE you to stop being such dicks? Let's face it Barrack, the US isn't exactly a shining paragon of example that the rest of the world is trying to follow.
 

Kieve

New member
Jan 4, 2011
128
0
0
About a year late and a billion dollars short there, Mr. President. Honestly, this man is an embarrassment to the Oval Office.

As a side-note, I wonder what provisions are being made for the NSA's new surveillance partnership with Microsoft? Y'know, what with their several million Kinect spycams now safely embedded in homes across the country.
 

Tanis

The Last Albino
Aug 30, 2010
5,264
0
0
Yeah, only AFTER all these leaks were released.

If Edward S. hadn't exposed him, and these programs, this crap would STILL be going on without him caring and getting WORSE.
 

omega 616

Elite Member
May 1, 2009
5,883
1
43
In his speech, Obama said his administration will continue to monitor other governments
such as who exactly?

Data on the length of calls, numbers, and the time the phone calls take place comprise the majority of telephone records.
I've not put a whole heap of thought into it but how does that help? "we know somebody called somebody else at midnight for 20 minutes and that is all we know" ..."are they criminals, terrorists or something?" ... "I don't know, all I know is that it happened!". (I know it says "majority")

I don't mean to generalize or attack any American's but this is one reason why I think American's are paranoid!
"If any individual who objects to government policy can take it in their own hands to publicly disclose classified information, then we will never be able to keep our people safe, or conduct foreign policy."
"We will never be able to keep our people safe" ... try not starting wars and maybe other countries people will be less likely to want to kill your people!

Look at the website address of that picture.


"Many a true word is spoken in jest"
 

RJ Dalton

New member
Aug 13, 2009
2,285
0
0
Just like he called for the closing of Guantanamo. Just like he called for the lobbyists to be booted out of Washington. Just like he called for a free and open internet to be upheld. Just like how he called for an end to the senseless wars this nation is embroiled in.

All of which he has not done. Honestly, why are we still expecting anything of this guy? He is at worst a liar and guilty by compliance with the biggest criminals in this country, or at best a moral coward who refuses to actually stand up for what he said he did because of the money and whatever other influences said criminals hold over this country.

Nothing will come of this.
 

Erttheking

Member
Legacy
Oct 5, 2011
10,845
1
3
Country
United States
omega 616 said:
I don't mean to generalize or attack any American's but this is one reason why I think American's are paranoid! [q
Yeah, to be perfectly honest, that's a stereotype that frankly I just can't criticize people for thinking considering all this shit that's going on.
 

csoloist

New member
Mar 27, 2009
55
0
0
roseofbattle said:
Obama will establish a panel of advocates outside of government. This panel will ask the attorney general and the NSA director to institute reforms. He is also willing to work with Congress on the matter. He hopes that his review will give Americans "greater confidence their rights are being protected."
Hoookay, so it's really just business as usual then, with no actual reforms in the pipe? What a shock.

roseofbattle said:
"This debate will make us strong. In this time of change, the United States of America will have to lead."
Oh 'Bama, you so silly. Even though you talk so pretty.
 

CriticalMiss

New member
Jan 18, 2013
2,024
0
0
he insists that surveillance is necessary and a part of the country's history
Just like racism, slavery and genocide. I guess the US government are allowed to do those things too.

Currently, the NSA follows all protocols and does not abuse the law, according to the president.
It's just a shame that they often don't. There were people at the NSA using their powers to spy on their loved ones. A small number (12 that they admit to) but it makes you wonder how many people get away with it and what else they are doing illegally.

Plus even if any of this is true and will actually happen it does nothing to address the issue of the 'States shitting on the privacy of the rest of the world. Which does more damage to diplomacy than people revealing your secrets.
 

omega 616

Elite Member
May 1, 2009
5,883
1
43
Shit I missed a line ...
"More work will be needed in the future," he concluded. "This debate will make us strong. In this time of change, the United States of America will have to lead."
Somebody either has a superiority complex or a major case of patriotic arrogance/megalomania. Will have to lead (what I assume to be) the rest of the world to where?

America is now an idyllic haven that the rest of humanity should aspire to be like and only America can show us the way!
 

Adam Jensen_v1legacy

I never asked for this
Sep 8, 2011
6,651
0
0
So we're supposed to trust the politicians, the government and intelligence agencies? How obvious is it that he's just trying to placate people? And the worst thing is, the majority will swallow it up because he just told them what they wanted to hear. You can go back to your homes. There's no police state in the US. Freedom for everyone. Even you.
 

Slash2x

New member
Dec 7, 2009
503
0
0
"i will not comment on mr Snowden" So you will not address the whistle blower.... The only reason you are talking about this.... And then you go on to DIRECTLY contradict the evidence he presented of illegal spying on your won citizens.... Wow what a fucking moron. Does anyone even believe the shit he says anymore?
 

Fox12

AccursedT- see you space cowboy
Jun 6, 2013
4,828
0
0
erttheking said:
So basically, he just said to the entire world, "Hey other countries! We're still gonna be spying on you!" Granted, this reform is a step in the right direction (if he's telling the truth) but this feels kinda half assed. A warrant will be needed? Good. That's, you know, the way it's fucking SUPPOSED to be. And it's part of our history? Um...pardon me Mr. President...when has that ever been a good fucking justification for fucking ANYTHING!?

Oh, and in this time of change, America will have to lead? Is that why Germany had to FORCE you to stop being such dicks? Let's face it Barrack, the US isn't exactly a shining paragon of example that the rest of the world is trying to follow.
Lets not forget that Snowden, the guy he just shit on, is the reason he was forced to make these concessions in the first place. It wasn't out of the kindness of his heart. It's sad it took this long to force him to do what he was expected to do from the beginning.

It's still a step in the right direction, even if I don't fully trust Obama. Someone like McCain wouldn't have even given us this much.

Smilomaniac said:
I have dealt with security from all over Europe, cops that take your ticket money and put it in their pocket, corrupt officials and seen a few things I wish I hadn't. Our countries are far from perfect.

But nothing has had me more worried than the total paranoia of a US airport and the populace in general. When I walked on Hoover Dam, I had my face covered due to sunburn and people were looking at me like I was a terrorist (probably because there was a sign that said "report suspicious activity" and there were guards everywhere).

When shit hits the fan one day and it goes beyond third world countries, you just know USA will be in the middle of it and won't care who else it affects. The way US citizens practically hand over their rights is just.. scary.

National security my ass.
To be fair a lot of us aren't happy about this either, it's a very ugly situation. A lot of our senators are fighting over this now. Where I live the paranoia isn't bad at all, but if you go to Washington It's completely out of control. Soldiers with sub machine guns patrol the streets and train stations all hours of the day, and there are overwhelming amounts of propaganda and sign warning about the "dangers of terrorism." Honestly, it feels like we're being conditioned.
 

Baresark

New member
Dec 19, 2010
3,908
0
0
First, everyone is spying on everyone else. All the non-Americans out there can sit on their high horses all they want. The main difference is that America and it's citizens are not OK with the prospect where many other countries have gotten used to their intrusive governments. Also, just because you're country doesn't admit that it spies on foreign people, that doesn't actually mean they don't.

Now that I have gotten that out of the way:
Better fuckin' rethink that. Spying on everyone is NOT OK. I'll take my chances getting killed by "terrorists" rather than have some idiot who works for the government looking over my shoulder all the time. It's rather annoying how any president can sit there and say that a lot of this stuff is OK. It's like I said, him and GWB are not different from each other. And the fact that he is OK with it just proves that point. The laws regarding wiretapping and surveillance are there to protect honest law abiding citizens, and just throwing them out as you see fit is not OK, certainly not good.
 

BakaSmurf

Elite Member
Dec 25, 2008
1,323
0
41
Fuck you Obama, fuck you and the horse you rode in on.

More and more I'm beginning to believe that the only way to rid the U.S. of these bass-ackwards fossils is a full-on revolution, or at the very least an entire government-wide coup. The current leaders of the US clearly fancy themselves the untouchable overlords of the populace what with their methodical snuffing out of rights that all should have while keeping the people distracted and blind to their sickening actions, the worst of which being denial of information.

Shit's going to get real ugly in the U.S. sooner or later, be it the government dropping all pretense of democracy and officially becoming a full-on police state that bends to the every whim of the corporations that line their pockets with dirty money, or the people rebelling upon realizing where the government intends to take their "leadership" *(and make you no mistake, if any civilian populace ever had the means or will to engage their government in a full-on armed rebellion, it is the assault rifle and high-powered mil-spec sniper rifle armed citizens of the United States of America), yet regardless of how it plays out, the ones that will suffer the most won't be these self-absorbed pieces of human trash that will in all likelihood flee the country and simply buy their way into a nation that would be happy to accept their filthy money, it will be the common civilian, you, your family, your neighbours, your countrymen, that will suffer the consequences of the government's actions.

If all of this ends without bloodshed to some degree, I will be so shocked that my head might very well a-splode into a billion pieces.

However, regardless of how this all will wind up playing out, I have no doubts in my mind that the United States of America will remain a free land, even if it ultimately takes on another name.

I think I'll end my mini-rant with a rather poignant quote from one of my favourate video games that comes to mind every time I sit down and think of the U.S. to any degree.

"Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
"If any individual who objects to government policy can take it in their own hands to publicly disclose classified information, then we will never be able to keep our people safe, or conduct foreign policy. Moreover, the sensational way in which these disclosures have come out has often shed more heat than light, while revealing methods to our adversaries that could impact our operations in ways that we may not fully understand for years to come."
If government lacks transparency so much that it would consider such data as classified you are never going to be able to keep your people safe anyway. Such information should have never been classified to begin with and any attempts to do so will only make your country worse.
 

Harleykin

New member
Sep 11, 2013
63
0
0
erttheking said:
Is that why Germany had to FORCE you to stop being such dicks?
speaking as a german, i didn't see us "forcing" anyone. our "Interior Minister" (thank you google translator) got mocked for his way of dealing with the whole situation. basically he went to th US came back and said "see guys? they told me they would never do it again...seriously you guys" few days later he went on to say it wasn't that big of a deal anyway.
thanks for doing your job the worst way possible motherf!!!!!

still i love how it's about security and "oh gawd dem terrorists" yeah i bet merkel was going to crash a plane into a building so good job listening in on her cellphone.

and by the way "part of our history" ha..ha...ha...ok let's play by those rules

germany history is starting world wars.
slavery is part of history in many countries.
cannibalism is history in regions.

let's just put those back into place i mean come on you guys we always did it why stop now!?