dunam said:
He had this on his facebook:
Do you have more information, because I notice whoever made that picture has cropped the date..
Literally the only thing I can find, beyond being a Muslim, to suggest a terrorist intent is that he shouted the Takbir before he died. The thing is, that is not an uncommon thing for a Muslim, or anyone with an arabic speaking background, to do. The phrase serves as a general display of strong emotion, to assume it makes someone an Islamist is like assuming that shouting "God damn it" means that someone is a Christian extremist.
dunam said:
He was known to police. He was still on his 6 months probation for assault.
Being known to police and being known to security services are two different things. From the sounds of it, the guy was an asshole who was abusive to his wife and violent to people around him. These are not traits particularly indicative of terrorism, although they do suggest the kind of violent and angry person we tend to find at the heart of many mass murders.
Until we find the evidence of contact with terrorist networks, with radicalization, evidence of ISIS support or extremist Islamic views then I'm really uncomfortable with labelling every Muslim who does a bad thing a terrorist by default. If anything, what we know so far suggests the opposite, it suggests someone who was not pious, drank alcohol, didn't pray, but seemed to have very deep personal problems and a lot of anger.
Again, I'm not saying it won't turn out to be a terrorist attack. But can we maybe defer judgement and just wait for the evidence, and perhaps in the meantime we can concentrate on the fact that a lot of people died. I understand trying to make sense of that, but leaping to conclusions does not help them or their families.
dunam said:
This wasn't a random act of violence, it was pre-meditated, with a higher casualty rate than Breivik's terrorist attack.
So what?
Breivik is not a terrorist because he killed a lot of people, he's a terrorist because he did it for political reasons (although he is also mentally ill, one of the major challenges we face is that people who are attracted to extreme or violent ideologies often are mentally ill - it's not always easy to separate one from the other). Regardless, there has to be something more to being a terrorist than just being a Muslim, right?
Many mass killings are pre-meditated to some degree. Again, it says nothing about motivation. Let's wait for the evidence on that, if nothing else because the type of language which gets used has real consequences for people. There will be revenge attacks, and I don't think the people who have died or their families would want innocent people to be attacked and hurt based on a bunch of rumours.
Again, I understand that when something bad happens there's this impulse to make sense of it or to understand why, but sometimes that impulse isn't helpful.
Let's grieve now, and judge later.