Paedophiles go camping too...

[polygon]

Do you guys have any idea how easy it is to become a sex offender? It'll be hilarious when one of you gets your life ruined because you told a brat to stop sitting on your car and she yelled "Rapist!!"

 

[Jamash]

That's pretty shitty for the marine who's there because he had sex with a 16 year old.

He's not even a paedophile yet he's forced to live under a bridge with all the other paedophiles, instead of being allowed to live with his family.

 

[Reaperman Wompa]

Why not build a small community of small and basic homes, hook them up to something that can allow them to work isolated then leave them there, monitored but away from any children. It's not that hard to build a small community that can live by itself, it would be something like a prison except they are allowed more freedom, enough to feel uncaged but not enough to allow them to hurt people again. They might have done something that I consider evil in the past, but theres a point where we're forcing people to live in squalor that we don't put murderers in.

 

[1337mokro]

Do you guys have any idea how easy it is to become a sex offender? It'll be hilarious when one of you gets your life ruined because you told a brat to stop sitting on your car and she yelled "Rapist!!"

A slight hinge in your set up there seeing as the brat shows no sings of struggle, bruises or sexual trauma. Unless your a drug dealing arms smuggler wanted by the Feds you would probably walk away from that law suit 100'000$ of mental damage money richer from the brats parents.

But what are we talking about here? We are discussing the very underbelly, the lowest of lowest criminals living under a bridge. I say congratulations Miami you have set an example for future sex offenders, do the crime, do the time than set up your tent under the bridge.

I bet half of the future Pedo's just stuck to kiddy porn and watching the local cheer squad thanks to that future prospect.

But honest they should just be given a stretch of land in the middle of the dessert and make it Pedo town. All the commodities and luxuries of city life with people as disgusting as yourself.

 

[bjj hero]

slight difference between drink driving, and raping children. drink drivers are much less likely to re-offend for one thing.
let them live under there bridges. better yet don't let them out of prison and take their human rights away.

Drink drivers are almost always repeat offenders. Its about how often they have been caught, quite similar to child sex offenders in that way. Very few people have driven drunk just the once. I'd argue most people who say so are not being honest.

 

[Susano]

Let the trolls live under the bridges where they belong. Once a sex offender, always a sex offender, people don't change.

That's bull, and even if it is true it's not how our law system works. It works on the basis of once you serve your time, you're "reformed". Granted it doesn't work that well, but if we use it we must abide by its rules.

But honest they should just be given a stretch of land in the middle of the dessert and make it Pedo town. All the commodities and luxuries of city life with people as disgusting as yourself.

This is one of the better solutions. None of this crap about " take their lives away" and "make them live under rocks". At least they get commodities and services here.

 

[LooK iTz Jinjo]

As Metallica said Kill 'em All.
Honestly there's a reason they're CONVICTED child sex offenders.

Ill be sure to teach my kids to never go under bridges.

Also this.

 

[polygon]

But what are we talking about here? We are discussing the very underbelly, the lowest of lowest criminals living under a bridge. I say congratulations Miami you have set an example for future sex offenders, do the crime, do the time than set up your tent under the bridge.

No we aren't. You are carrying on the common misconception that the title of "child sex offender" has any bearing on whether or not you actually ever did anything to a child. You can get on there for anything from walking a mile near a school without a shirt on to taking a piss in a bush to tapping a kid on the shoulder. And then of course there's the whole 14-17 set of girls in their sexual prime to which any psychologically sound heterosexual male should scientifically be attracted that are associated with pedophilia for some retarded reason.
Ever had a girlfriend in high school? You deserve to be condemned by society and live under a bridge for the rest of your life, you fucking sick bastard.

The whole subject is such a huge shitfest. Thousands of people get their lives ruined for no reason because of bullshit like this.

 

[Knight Templar]

Let the trolls live under the bridges where they belong. Once a sex offender, always a sex offender, people don't change.

In America being listed as a sex offender and being a sex offender are sometimes quite diffrent. Being a listed sex offender doesn't mean you are a pedophile, it just means its more likely you are than the next person.
But hey, lets keep treating these people as animals, thats a sure way to keep them following the laws.

I don't think people realise that most (if not all) the people living there are not likely to commit a crime like that again, which isn't saying much considering for most there was hardly a crime to begin.

 

[Jamash]

That's pretty shitty for the marine who's there because he had sex with a 16 year old.

He's not even a paedophile yet he's forced to live under a bridge with all the other paedophiles, instead of being allowed to live with his family.

Legally, he is a paedophile. Why do you think that paedophiles HAVE to be stereotypical middle aged men, with weird coats over naked body and vans with word "candy" spelled out in colourful letters on it's side?

I'm pretty sure that if 18 or 19 year old has sex with a 17 year old, it's still a sexual encounter with a minor - thus paedophilia. Even if they were in a long lasting relationship that started when both of them were below 18.

Well, i guess that most serious judges would pull a blind eye on this type of thing.

But then there is the whole "sexting" thing that (if my memory serves me right) pretty much made a bunch of 16 year olds child porn makers and dealers because they made a photo of themselves and sent it to friends, and then it got distributed and shit.

Law is a hammer. More like, a big mallet. If you let it hit one thing, chances are, it's going to smash a lot more then you need or want.

I get what you're saying, but technically he's not a paedophile because the person he had sex with was sexually mature. He's legally a sex offender, because the age of consent by law is something higher than 16, but he's not paedophile (the definition of a paedophile is an adult who is sexually attracted to children who aren't sexually mature, who's bodies haven't gone through puberty and who shouldn't be sexually attractive).

I suppose I think it's a rough break for him because in the UK the age of consent is 16, and I hate the idea of being forced to live under a bridge with paedophiles because of a law, not because of a moral issue.

 

[Altorin]

Why not build a small community of small and basic homes, hook them up to something that can allow them to work isolated then leave them there, monitored but away from any children. It's not that hard to build a small community that can live by itself, it would be something like a prison except they are allowed more freedom, enough to feel uncaged but not enough to allow them to hurt people again. They might have done something that I consider evil in the past, but theres a point where we're forcing people to live in squalor that we don't put murderers in.

so...

a prison?

 

[Altorin]

for the record, the lot of you make me sick.

The point is, they're free, and they're stuck under a bridge because geography?

Geography? Miami is densely populated, so there's no way to NOT be within the limit of children and be thrown back in jail?

These are people who are trying to follow a law that's retarded. Real sex offenders don't give 2 shits, and would be back into the town stalking the school yard or whatever. These are people who are trying to get their lives back on track, and because they live in a densely populated area, they're stuck under a bridge, fuck that.

 

[Lt. Sera]

But hey, lets keep treating these people as animals, thats a sure way to keep them following the laws.

What Mr. Sarcasm said

Keep treating them like shit rather then trying to help them live with the affliction that they have. After they've done their time, people should be helped in trying to get back as a functioning member of society. For paedophiles this should of course come with several obvious limits (no living/working near children etc) but branding them publicly and treating them like shit sure as hell won't make anything better.
If you have to live under a bridge, you'd be better off in jail.

 

[Rafe]

I thought people were born Paedophiles or pushed that way because of their upbringing.

Well anyway they don't deserve that because of what their genes drive them to do.

Damn that makes me sound like a Paedophile sympathiser, they are heavily disturbed individuals but they don't need that.

 

[Knight Templar]

But hey, lets keep treating these people as animals, thats a sure way to keep them following the laws.

What Mr. Sarcasm said

Keep treating them like shit rather then trying to help them live with the affliction that they have. After they've done their time, people should be helped in trying to get back as a functioning member of society. For paedophiles this should...

Most people in this situation are not paedophiles, because a paedophile isn't living under a bridge, he is living next to a school.

 

[Reaperman Wompa]

Why not build a small community of small and basic homes, hook them up to something that can allow them to work isolated then leave them there, monitored but away from any children. It's not that hard to build a small community that can live by itself, it would be something like a prison except they are allowed more freedom, enough to feel uncaged but not enough to allow them to hurt people again. They might have done something that I consider evil in the past, but theres a point where we're forcing people to live in squalor that we don't put murderers in.

so...

a prison?

Think more supervised freedom. They have things not allowed in prison, they just also have trackers and internet filters, it lets them feel more free and in return we can keep an eye on them, it works and it allows them to be treated as people instead of spending the rest of their lives in a box.