Yup. It's Star Trek - 1 and Star Wars - 1.leviticusd said:Wait, is that a Star Trek vs. Star Wars comment? Uh...Sir Alec Guinness...the original Obi-Wan?KwaggaDan said:Okay, so now Star Trek has a knight in it's pocket too. Well, until Liam Neeson gets knighted...
Sabrestar said:Purely honourary, it's part of the system that the British Empire / United Kingdom has used to recognise its most distinguished citizens for centuries now. The titles are primarily feudal relics. As I recall knighthood is the step beyond OBE (Officer of the British Empire) and CBE (Commander - this is why James Bond is sometimes referenced in the stories as Commander Bond, as he had a CBE).shaboinkin said:can someone explain what the Knighthood means and where it came from? Cause im terribly confused on what just happened
CommCommander Bond was referred to as such because that was his commissioned rank within the Admiralty not because he held a CBE. A CBE only entitles you to have it after your name, no title is attached.Sabrestar said:Purely honourary, it's part of the system that the British Empire / United Kingdom has used to recognise its most distinguished citizens for centuries now. The titles are primarily feudal relics. As I recall knighthood is the step beyond OBE (Officer of the British Empire) and CBE (Commander - this is why James Bond is sometimes referenced in the stories as Commander Bond, as he had a CBE).shaboinkin said:can someone explain what the Knighthood means and where it came from? Cause im terribly confused on what just happened
Well, he could get a peerage, which is the next step beyond and would give him a seat in the House of Lords. Because if Sir Patrick Stewart is awesome, Lord Patrick Stewart would be a Crowning Moment of Awesome. (Lord Stewart, Baron of Enterprise?)PipBoy2000 said:Can this man get any more awesome?
Christopher Lee was Knighted, but the date at which that occured escapes me.Daipire said:Hey, I was reading this thing about Christopher Lee, has he been knighted?
Cause he ruled in WW2
So shouldn't that say, then, that "Kirk could beat Picard in a fight..."? /grammar-naziUncompetative said:Kirk would beat Picard in a fight, but Picard would talk him out of it first.
;-)
Kirk couldn't beat Picard in a fight - he would never get the opportunity, there would be no losers, only diplomacy would prevail.WhiteTigerShiro said:So shouldn't that say, then, that "Kirk could beat Picard in a fight..."? /grammar-naziUncompetative said:Kirk would beat Picard in a fight, but Picard would talk him out of it first.
;-)
Ah, I get ya. So you meant that "Kirk would (as-in, gladly) beat-up Picard, but he wouldn't get the chance due to Picard rolling a 20 on his Diplomacy stat."Uncompetative said:Kirk couldn't beat Picard in a fight - he would never get the opportunity, there would be no losers, only diplomacy would prevail.WhiteTigerShiro said:So shouldn't that say, then, that "Kirk could beat Picard in a fight..."? /grammar-naziUncompetative said:Kirk would beat Picard in a fight, but Picard would talk him out of it first.
;-)
Of course, Picard versus a whole planet full of Gorns is another matter entirely...