People Never Shut Up In Bioshock Infinite

Ninjat_126

New member
Nov 19, 2010
775
0
0
Dfskelleton said:
This could be a brilliant step forward or the bane of the game depending on how this is executed.
However, I must add that I had a lot more fun with Bioshock 2 when I played through the second time, except giving Delta a personality. He was some bizzare chimera of Andy Griffith and the generic white supremacist, except instead of being a white supremacist, he was a Big Daddy supremacist.
It actually got to the point where I sounded like freaking SHODAN, going on about "The pathetic limitations of flesh" and whatnot.
See this is what's amusing about Silent Protagonists. You can do goofy crap like this.
I assume you watch Freeman's Mind?

I love silent protagonists, but at the same time I'm too meta to come up with a proper personality for anyone of my characters. I tried playing my Dark Souls character as a merciless Darkwraith bastard and still faltered when I found Quelaag's Sister.

Plus, it gets strained at times. Artyom from Metro 2033 only speaks on loading screens, despite the opportunities for conversation in the gameplay. And Nathan Hale from Resistance spoke too much to be silent, but too little to be a real characterised character.
 

Quaxar

New member
Sep 21, 2009
3,949
0
0
Grey Carter said:
BioShock Infinite arrives on October 19th. Now, would you kindly click that like button?

Source: Eurogamer [http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2012-03-19-one-bioshock-infinite-level-contains-three-times-more-dialogue-than-all-of-bioshock-1]
Damnit, I actually clicked the button before I realized... this conditioning is hard to break.
 

Salakayin

New member
Apr 1, 2010
79
0
0
Ninjat_126 said:
I love silent protagonists, but at the same time I'm too meta to come up with a proper personality for anyone of my characters. I tried playing my Dark Souls character as a merciless Darkwraith bastard and still faltered when I found Quelaag's Sister.

Plus, it gets strained at times. Artyom from Metro 2033 only speaks on loading screens, despite the opportunities for conversation in the gameplay. And Nathan Hale from Resistance spoke too much to be silent, but too little to be a real characterised character.
To be fair to Artyom, I take it more as he just chooses not to speak. He seems a fairly introverted character even before the main plot-line of events in the game. I imagine the events of the game don't really tend themselves to much more of that, all things considered. Although technically he does say a word outside the narration. It's just a well-timed curse as a train-cart-dealy comes crashin' down on him. It counts!

As for the actual topic, I'll be keepin' my eye on this deal. Conversation would make sense between these two characters, but let's just hope it isn't a lot of boring dronin' about and more entertainin' then such! But I'll hold faith for now, since nothin' says it won't be terrible yet.
 

windlenot

Archeoastronomist
Mar 27, 2011
329
0
0
I don't know why, but I don't think I'll like it as much... Maybe I just didn't care much for the dialogue and I felt the audio logs had enough for me. I guess I can't judge off what I see now, but I can't say I'm sold.
 

RJ 17

The Sound of Silence
Nov 27, 2011
8,687
0
0
God......DAMNIT Elizabeth's got a nice rack!

:p Sorry, it's tradition at this point.

As for the topic at hand, I really am looking forward to this game. I've been a big fan of the BS series....ahem, Bioshock (perhaps it's better not to use the abbreviation >.>). Anyways, been a big fan of the series since the first game, I love a good FPS that has a good story to go along with it, and even with the apparently limited writing on the first two games I think they both did very well in telling their stories. More talkative characters and interactions? Yes please. That's one of the things I loved most about Mass Effect 3: the conversations you'd walk in on went entering a squadmate's room. Be it Garrus and James sharing war stories or Tali getting wasted in the ship's lounge or Liara failing at piercing through Javik's cold-hearted shell.

I'm definitely big on character interaction, so more writing = good in my book.

Really I'm wondering how (if at all) they intend to tie in this game's super-city to Rapture and the events of the previous two games. As I recall, isn't Columbia supposed to have been built BEFORE Rapture? If so, wouldn't Ryan have known about its existence? :3 just saying one would think there was an audio journal of Ryan talking about the city in the sky.
 

aemroth

New member
Mar 17, 2010
59
0
0
Quazimofo said:
and it kind of helped the immersion for me as well, since you wouldn't just listen to the audio diaries while killing bastards, you would find a quiet spot to rest and listen, especially considering how quickly that plane ride turned into one hell of an adventure, and without even a wink of sleep to separate it all.
This is basically it. Good storytelling is greatly aided by pacing. Games need a a pause every now and then, to let a player breath and gain momentum to step into something more intense again. This is precisely why some action-oriented blockbusters that keep throwing stuff at you relentlessly actually get boring after a while. It sounds like an oxymoron, but if you're always in the fray, it ceases to impress and the impact and emotional connection is lost. If you keep things going like a rollercoaster, it's easier to keep it interesting. This is essential why people regard Valve as good storytellers, specially within the spectrum of FPS's.

Now, obviously there is some personal variation to how much action and pause each person likes, but that's why non-action sequences are mostly optional or don't require you to spend too much time on them, you choose your pacing at your leisure. Which is vastly different from strapping you on rails for a set amount of time, like Levine mentioned.

Anyway, i for one welcome this, and trust Levine to keep it interesting, he's a smart guy with good gut feelings about game design :)
 

Frotality

New member
Oct 25, 2010
982
0
0
snarky title aside, more dialogue isnt automatically better. bioshock didnt have much dialogue, but that made every line spoken all the more dramatic and memorable (who doesnt still have nightmares of all the creepy stuff splicers say?). it was well organized into pithy witticisms from ryan, ominous threats from the local boss, and gibbering madness from the mooks.

bringing that snarky title back from the side, too much dialogue can make you feel like saying "would you(kindly) shut up already?!" its obvious they want to do the PoP: Sands of Time thing; you and your sidekick developing a relationship through dialogue the whole game that flows nicely alongside the gameplay and helps to pace the action. hopefully they can pull it off and not end up like the PoP reboot where the two characters just pointlessly snarked at each other for 5 hours.
 

Dfskelleton

New member
Apr 6, 2010
2,851
0
0
Farther than stars said:
For the record, that thing with the gold club wasn't exactly expression of feelings, at least not in my opinion.
I get the feeling that the whole "Golf Club" scene with Andrew Ryan has become to the Bioshock series as anything James Sunderland did in Silent Hill 2 is to the Silent Hill series, I.E. constantly referenced jokingly.
 

Gardenia

New member
Oct 30, 2008
972
0
0
I was afraid of this. I'm a big fan of "less is more" when it comes to dialogue, and I'd rather have 1 hour of expertly crafted monologues than 10 hours of Oblivion npc banter. But then again, I'll have a wait and see-attitude.
 

The Wykydtron

"Emotions are very important!"
Sep 23, 2010
5,458
0
0
As long as it's well paced it should be a good idea. Too many stories have been ruined by bad pacing.

Really if you want an example of godawful pacing, just look at Black Ops. Or better yet play Black ops for 2 hours then tell me you don't feel sick of it. The story would have been slightly good for once! But no... Just no.

On the opposite side of the pacing spectrum we have Scratches, a point and click "horror" game that forgets to even hint at anything that could remotely hurt you until at least the halfway point. Instead we have a creepy house to walk around solving ridiculously obtuse puzzles. Oh shit i'm really scared now!

If Bioware Bioshock gives you too many sections going all "look at Lizzy, isn't she awesome!?" It's not gonna be that good. Don't know this Levine guy much though, has he done anything good?
 

Zeckt

New member
Nov 10, 2010
1,085
0
0
This is one of the few games I will allow myself to hype over, as I was not even dissapointed by Bioshock 2 and could not figure out its hate. Minerva's den equaled to one of my favorite moments ever in gaming, I am pretty excited about this game and it will be a day one purchase for me.
 

Steve the Pocket

New member
Mar 30, 2009
1,649
0
0
This can only be a good thing. I remember when I finally got the original BioShock and made it past the section that was in the demo, I was disappointed by how samey all the splicers' lines were. The first section incorporated a few distinct splicers with their own little mini-scenes (Brenda, Charlie, the lady with the baby carriage), plus the characters in that cut scene after you first inject yourself with Electrobolt. But pretty much all of the enemies after that were clones with the same five models and voice actors. Heck, even BioShock 2 incorporated a handful of scripted scenes between some of the splicers with unique lines, even if they were still using the stock models and voices for them.

Of course, now, after playing Fallout 3 some, I realize just how much better BioShock would have been with even more friendly-NPC interation (and if it had been a straight-up RPG shooter like its predecessors, but that's another story). There's no real reason that Rapture had to have been completely devoid of human life besides splicers and a handful of NPCs you never get to talk to except that it was easier to make that way.
 

aemroth

New member
Mar 17, 2010
59
0
0
The Wykydtron said:
As long as it's well paced it should be a good idea. Too many stories have been ruined by bad pacing.

Really if you want an example of godawful pacing, just look at Black Ops. Or better yet play Black ops for 2 hours then tell me you don't feel sick of it. The story would have been slightly good for once! But no... Just no.

On the opposite side of the pacing spectrum we have Scratches, a point and click "horror" game that forgets to even hint at anything that could remotely hurt you until at least the halfway point. Instead we have a creepy house to walk around solving ridiculously obtuse puzzles. Oh shit i'm really scared now!

If Bioware Bioshock gives you too many sections going all "look at Lizzy, isn't she awesome!?" It's not gonna be that good.
Don't know this Levine guy much though, has he done anything good?
Worked on the legendary Looking Glass Studios, namely doing the original design for Thief, went on to start Irrational with 2 other Looking Glass ex-employees, and in that role, was the lead designer and writer of System Shock 2 and, of course, Bioshock (and no, wasn't directly involved in Bioshock 2). And he's one of those few designers that is actually a joy to hear on a keynote or interview, you can tell he gets it.
 

ZehMadScientist

New member
Oct 29, 2010
1,806
0
0
Assuming I won't be distracted by 'em curves...

As long as the dialogue is actually intersting, I'm all for it. I pray that it won't be an overkill of words that hold little value.

Still, it's BioShock, I'm confident it will turn out great.
 

jawakiller

New member
Jan 14, 2011
776
0
0
I don't know, talkative female can turn in to yappy ***** in a hurry. I hope they were careful because this sequel actually looked pretty good. Unlike the other one. I would hate to see them ruin it with a squawking parrot.
 

Caffeine_Bombed

New member
Feb 13, 2012
209
0
0
I'm liking the sound of this. When you actually have an NPC accompanying you for large portions I find it creates a more immersive game when the characters converse with each other.
I guess it just depends what type of gamer you are.
 

PrototypeC

New member
Apr 19, 2009
1,075
0
0
Quaxar said:
Grey Carter said:
BioShock Infinite arrives on October 19th. Now, would you kindly click that like button?

Source: Eurogamer [http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2012-03-19-one-bioshock-infinite-level-contains-three-times-more-dialogue-than-all-of-bioshock-1]
Damnit, I actually clicked the button before I realized... this conditioning is hard to break.
A man chooses, a slave obeys, GREY CARTER.

There's nothing I can really say that hasn't already been said. I guess I've had enough -Shock, and a new one just isn't interesting to me. As cleverly as it may be put together, it's still mostly shooting dudes. Those... whad'ya-call'em... Great Silence Boys? They looked interesting character-wise, but it's very hard to make sneaking actually any fun in games...
 

Thorvan

New member
May 15, 2009
272
0
0
On the topic of Elizabeth's shape; Anyone who's worked with period costumes up until about the 1920s (When corsets started to do the opposite) Will know that basically regardless of shape, a properly done corset always equals EXTREME BREAST EXPLOSION. Now, MY question? How the hell can she breathe leaping around in that thing? Doesn't she need, you know, air to deliver all those lines?