Peter Molyneux Claims Xbox One Kinect is a "Joke" and "Unnecessary"

sageoftruth

New member
Jan 29, 2010
3,417
0
0
Not sure what to say. I don't own an Xbox One, but I heard that the Kinect allows you to sign in to Xbox Live just by showing your face to the Kinect. Considering how obnoxious it is to type anything using a controller, that's got to count for something. Still not sure if it's worth an extra $100. If it eventually leads to the creation of a much cheaper piece of hardware that can do the same thing, then maybe I'm game. After all, hardware has a tendency to get smaller, better, and cheaper as time goes on.
 

William Ossiss

New member
Apr 8, 2010
551
0
0
I think this is hilarious. This coming from the SAME GUY who got on stage at E3 and talked about the Kinect being something amazing. Yeah, still a giant hypocrite, Peter.

This guy is just... The biggest liar in the industry.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDvHlwNvXaM
(Can't figure out why I can't do the video properly.)
 

neppakyo

New member
Apr 3, 2011
238
0
0
I do agree that the kinect is a joke and not needed.

I just think Peter is a complete tool.
 

LordMonty

Badgerlord
Jul 2, 2008
570
0
0
Well another little push in the right direction cannot harm anyone. Ol' Pete can be a little loopey but frankly this is all truth and hopefully the new Xbox head honcho who seems to be saying the right thing might do the right things and this console war will get back on track... although i'm still kinda with sony on this one, you shouldn't have to spell out how a good gaming console works to a big powerful mega compony like microsoft it really isn't rocket science.
 

Barbas

ExQQxv1D1ns
Oct 28, 2013
33,804
0
0
William Ossiss said:
...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDvHlwNvXaM
(Can't figure out why I can't do the video properly.)

You can press the Quote button on this comment and it'll display the code you can copy and paste for the video above. For a YouTube video, you want everything after the "=" symbol. You can also make it start and finish at a certain point by adding "&start=" and then"&end=" onto the very end of the code, but you can't put the time in the same format as it is on the YouTube video - you have to type in the number of seconds, so 1 minute and 10 seconds would be "&start=70".

OT: Well, he's broken a lot of promises, but that doesn't change the fact that I agree with him here. I can't see any reason for the Kinect to be packaged with the Xbone. It doesn't seem to add anything of value.
 

Baldr

The Noble
Jan 6, 2010
1,739
0
0
Elijin said:
So when he releases a game 100% kinect based, its totally necessary and important.

When his games bombs entirely, he turns around and dismisses the kinect as useless.

Regardless of which of the two comments is valid, its petty as hell.
Not just a bomb game, but also Microsoft wouldn't give him the go ahead on Kinect's Project Milo.

http://www.gamespot.com/articles/microsoft-s-ambitious-xbox-kinect-game-project-milo-not-coming-back/1100-6418071/


I been playing Kinect Sports Rivals. I love the game. If most games just use 10% of what Rare has done with the Kinect it definitely worth it.
 

vagabondwillsmile

New member
Aug 20, 2013
221
0
0
Alex Co said:
Peter Molyneux Claims Xbox One Kinect is "Unnecessary" and a "Joke"


"It feels like an unnecessary add-on to me. Maybe it's because we're in England, and it doesn't really use the TV stuff, but it feels more and more like a joke. My son and I sit there saying random things at it, and it doesn't work. They could cost-reduce it [by removing Kinect]. I'm sure they're going to release an Xbox One without Kinect. It would be unthinkable that they wouldn't.


Source: GameSpot [http://www.edge-online.com/news/can-microsoft-turn-things-around-for-xbox-one-we-speak-to-phil-spencer-phil-harrison-and-more-to-find-out/]


Permalink
Another thing about living in England and Europe in general, homes and family rooms just aren't as big as they are in the U.S. and Canada. The Kinect for a lot of gameplay functionality needs a bit of space to read the player and his/her movements. So, it's not getting much use in the U.S., its key market. And as it's being forced onto the console for Europe, it really is just a paper weight for the majority of players.
 

Seracen

New member
Sep 20, 2009
645
0
0
(Insert obvious pun about Peter M's ideas likewise being "unnecessary" and "a joke")

If he wanted to sound sincere, and not pandering, he should have said "a disappointment," considering he was on the bandwagon not too long ago.

Seriously, who cares what he even says anymore, is he even making games now?
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Sarge034 said:
Peter Molyneux speaking common sense and within attainable goals... Who is this imposter!?!?!? But more importantly, how do we keep this imposter?
No no no no, you have it all wrong. He's the real PM, speaking his usual craziness. That means....We were wrong about Kinect!
 

Chatboy 91

New member
Feb 25, 2011
101
0
0
Wow. I never thought I'd see the day I agree with Molyneux.

Is the world ending? Or has Peter just had his first moment of clarity in years? I'm more inclined towards the former...
 

Alex Co

New member
Dec 11, 2013
1,183
0
0
vagabondwillsmile said:
Alex Co said:
Peter Molyneux Claims Xbox One Kinect is "Unnecessary" and a "Joke"


"It feels like an unnecessary add-on to me. Maybe it's because we're in England, and it doesn't really use the TV stuff, but it feels more and more like a joke. My son and I sit there saying random things at it, and it doesn't work. They could cost-reduce it [by removing Kinect]. I'm sure they're going to release an Xbox One without Kinect. It would be unthinkable that they wouldn't.


Source: GameSpot [http://www.edge-online.com/news/can-microsoft-turn-things-around-for-xbox-one-we-speak-to-phil-spencer-phil-harrison-and-more-to-find-out/]


Permalink
Another thing about living in England and Europe in general, homes and family rooms just aren't as big as they are in the U.S. and Canada. The Kinect for a lot of gameplay functionality needs a bit of space to read the player and his/her movements. So, it's not getting much use in the U.S., its key market. And as it's being forced onto the console for Europe, it really is just a paper weight for the majority of players.
That's the same in Asia, too. No room for Kinect, sadly.

PrimePowerOn said:
Alex Co said:
For Xbox One users, do you agree that Kinect is a joke on the console or is Molyneux just not using it correctly?
Is he using a product he owns - that he bought, with his own money - incorrectly? No. He can turn it into Johnny 5 or try to convince 5 year olds he's invented teleportation with it. It's his, he can do what he wants.

I think the idea that you can use a Kinect wrong gives Microsoft way too much validation. They made a product that is supposed to work this one way. It's not the way YOU want, it's the way THEY want. They want to be the front end to everything on your living room set, and that would be fine, if they brought something to enhance the experience. But, Kinect has never worked perfectly. I can change channels pretty easily, just pressing buttons on my remote.

(Not that I ever watch TV on cable anyway. I'm basically online only.)
Agreed, sir. :)
 

Neurotic Void Melody

Bound to escape
Legacy
Jul 15, 2013
4,953
6
13
I would prefer games to be deep, complex, beautiful thought experiments that inspire more avenues of creativity and sweet escapism. Its hard enough for developers to achieve this without being told to shoehorn the sodding kinect into it! I mean, what happened to Rare? They became Ms's kinect sports ***** and now they hide in shame! Financially comfortable shame...but shame all the same.

OT, Peter is somehow becoming more likable to me for some other reason. It has to be his projected dislocated personality. Having character will certainly get you into MY bed, sir!!
Though some ppl just mature beyond themselves. We cant undo our past actions. Only learn from them. It can take some dark introspection.
 
Oct 20, 2010
424
0
0
This is Hysterical. The SAME asshole who decries the Controller as a non-interactive HINDERANCE to gaming?!?!?
My take away from that is that you are actually worse at video games than everybody else in the world, ever. Now the Kinect is a joke, because its exponentially worse than controllers.

I find it Triple Hysterical that the ONLY working, half way fun title is a clone of Wii sports. At the point where I have to stand up and jump about to play sports, I'll just go play some sports.

Fuck, it's like the wii-bowling craze. $300 for a simulator to a game you can play for $15 down the street.

@AlexCo. Everybody is using it correctly, it doesn't work. It never has worked, and EVEN if it worked flawlessly, the actual motion in game, are still akward, counter-intuitive and general just plain fucking ridiculous. Watch the CsrewAttack guys struggle with DBZ, and see the meaning of "It's a Joke."

http://www.screwattack.com/shows/originals/screwin-around/screwin-around-w-dragonball-z-kinect
 

Shamanic Rhythm

New member
Dec 6, 2009
1,653
0
0
Kinect isn't as big a joke as Peter Molyneux promising that a Kinect game wouldn't be on-rails and signing a whiteboard to prove it... then followed by it being totally on rails.
 

Arawn

New member
Dec 18, 2003
515
0
0
Jeroenr said:
Also this is exactly why the kinect was/is so poorly received.

First gamers didn't buy it because there was a lack of (good)games, and game companies didn't really want to make games because not enough people ownd one. (loop back to start of the sentince)

Microsoft did do the senseble thing and include it as a core part.

But by then gamers thought of it as a kid's toy, and game companies just can't be botherd.
Partly because game companies dont really wat to take the time to do al that work for just one system. (same goes for Wii U)

Right now people like Peter Molyneux declairing the Kinect "a joke" is whats harming it the most.
Put al that effort in making a good game for it, instead of trying to kick it down.

But i do think that by releasing the first kinect for the Xbox360, Microsoft played it's card a bit early.
And if Kinect came out of the blue For Xbox One, it would have been far better received.
This is a good analysis of the Kinect situation. They want more people to have it, so more people (devs) will us it. Take it off and fewer devs will try to incorporate the system. It's a catch 22: More people need to buy it for it to work. Problem being that the last Kinect left a bad taste in everyone's mouth. So by boxing it with the Xbox One MS hopes to create a big enough base for the unit. Unfortunately, many are blaming the low sales due to the bundle. I think it's partially true, but the other reason for low sales is still the "Online check in" backlash. The incident and how it was handled stung MS pretty hard.