Indeed so, but what I am getting at, and this is the kicker, if the device starts out over the top expensive, then fewer consumers (Mostly children) will not be able to afford the system and therefore NOT invest in the money making games. QED, overpriced, malfunctioning system sinks like the Titanic. It is big, built by the best, and doomed from the get-go. It took this long to get to working, which means that they lost money, in some form or another, and they cannot get it back. Instead, they are still selling the old crap that was built RIGHT. Of course, as things progress and develop, the PS3 will overwhelm the unsatasfactory graphics of the PS2 and win in that respect, but it took THREE AND A HALF YEARS just to get to that pivitol plateau.thethingthatlurks said:
My point is simply make the system a finished product before you give it to the masses. Appeal to nearly every audience (The people who like PS1, PS2 and PSP games) and give them more of what they want. Reverse capability? Sure. Liquid coolers? Why not. Various games that come out regularly that are both fun and detailed? That's why we're here.
They give us none of this, and that is why I have purchased a 360. I can play the three main zombie games today (L4D, Dead Rising, Resident Evil) and have a vast library of other games to choose from. Grant it, the Xbox sucks donkie testies because the games frequently crash or glitch, but I can play them. By what I hear, the PS3 is a sluggish monster that has lower quality video, sound, and detail with DVD and better crap with Blue Ray.
Enough of that though, let's CONGO!
