Yea, this is sort of like having a restraining order between neighbors, but still having a rope bridge connecting the two houses. If you really don't want to have contact with that person, DON'T ENABLE THEM. Another problem with pokes is there's no way of knowing when it was sent - could have been before the restraining order, then we fast-forward to the date in question and UH-OH - the defendant's computer just received your back-logged poke! GO TO JAIL NOWChipperz said:Surely if she hadn't been on Facebook, she wouldn't have noticed she'd been poked? Hell, I know people that delete friends on Facebook out of boredom, doing it because of a restraining order is pretty much mandatory.The_root_of_all_evil said:*frowns* That's not a giant hole. Quite the reverse.Tom Goldman said:There's a giant hole in this story if you haven't caught it yet. Anybody that uses Facebook and has broken up with a significant other or ended a friendship violently knows that you can easily remove people from your friends list. Facebook by default, in my experience, does not allow the poking of people that are not on your friends list. So, in this case, the poking victim could have just removed Jackson from her friends list.
I don't know about other people, but when I had a very, very bad break-up, I couldn't even bear to log onto my page, never mind remove someone from my profile.
If they were threatening me as well, I doubt I could even do anything rather than report it.
Fairs fair Tom, this women may just be scared. And the Law does say "NO contact".
btw, to anyone who has a restraining order set on me:
POKE. Also, I found a very frowny lamb today. I intend to chop its head off and make a roast and you can't have any! POKE POKE POKE