That helps a lot. Much appreciated.Silvanus said:Pretty much. Without a majority, the government cannot pass legislation without support from other parties, and the DUP are no longer enough. Opponents of "no-deal" are meanwhile able to pass legislation much more easily, and they've taken full advantage of this in the past few days.Dalisclock said:Okay, that helps. So basically, without an election, the Conservatives don't have a majority(even with DUP) and it effectively ties their hand as a government unless they make deals with Labour(I think that's the biggest opposition party) and nobody really wants to schedule an election at the moment due to BoJo's Shenanigans? Am I getting this right so far?
Johnson hoped that by calling an election, he could win back a majority and then control the agenda. Labour had agreed with the Lib Dems, SNP, Plaid and the Greens that legislating against no-deal was a more immediate priority than bringing down the government, and thus decided not to risk the current situation by backing the election, since they already control the agenda more than the government. Labour made the right call strategically.
It feels like reading news articles(Mostly NYT and Guardian) doesn't help that much because most seem to either not explain the implications/context very well(American Sources) or kinda assume you already know the context(British sources).
The weirdest thing for me is, being used to 2 main parties which more or less stand on opposing sides of many issues(with some variation and such), Brexit seems to be more or less to split the major British Parties, so trying to get a handle on just which ones are on which sides feels tricky and complicated.