In this article [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rob-conery/luke-skywalker-theory-destroys-everything-star-wars_b_8392698.html?utm_hp_ref=tw&ir=Australia] by one Rob Conery on huffington post the fascinating proposal is put forth that Luke is indeed already a Dark Jedi, that Return of the Jedi was not some final victory for the Light but was in fact just a chronicle of Luke's remarkably Anakin-like fall to evil.
I heartily recommend you read the article yourself before commenting, but I offer here this summation:
Personally I love this viewing of the film. I really freaking love it. I think I'm going to keep both interpretations in my head and employ them when I see fit - watching the film with Luke as an already-gone Dark Jedi, or watching it as I have always watched it before today. Luke is such a more interesting character - a really modern character - when one imagines him as a failure who simply gets away with it.
I just really like how this theory actually seems to beef up the prequel trilogy, tying in a lot of the writing and increasing the meaning of scenes such as Windu's fall. Also it makes Luke much more human, an orphan who has idolized his father growing up in a harsh environment and gone on to emulate him all too literally - unlike Leia, who grew up in an environment of love on Alderaan and seems remarkably airy-fairy at the end of Episode VI...
I guess all we can do now is wait to see what Luke's up to in The Force Awakens.
I heartily recommend you read the article yourself before commenting, but I offer here this summation:
Luke turned. The post asserts from the beginning that we all saw what we thought we were seeing: Luke, dressed from head to toe in Black, condemned as a failure by Yoda, does take his saber and attempt to strike the Emperor down, completing his "journey" to the Dark Side as the Emperor threatened.
He turned because he wanted to save his friends and sister, who were both being heavily pressed by both daddy Vader and the Emperor right in front of him.
The original intended ending of Episode VI was that the rebellion would be all but destroyed, Leia would be 'struggling with her new duties as Queen' and Luke would be 'walking off into the sunset'.
This was all foreshadowed, as in the cave scene in Empire Strikes Back - which always struck me as being out of place and not entirely locked in with the rest of the plot - when Luke slices open Vader's ghostly helmet only to see his own face starting back at him.
Yoda warned Luke that he will fail - "If you end your training now... if you choose the quick and easy path as Vader did... you will become an agent of evil" - later to Obi-Wan: "Told you I did, reckless is he... now... matters are worse."
Mark Hamill said that he thought Luke was a Dark Jedi after completing filming of Empire Strikes Back
It's easy to note a change in Luke's demeanor between the second and third installments of the original trilogy. Not only is he wearing all black - something that sat uneasily with me even when I was a 6 year old - he is also more serious - "A little more sinister" in the words of the author of the article - executing much more carefully lain and subtle plans.
Quoted in the article and re-quoted here:
How many times have we heard agents of the Dark Side reiterate that one must not underestimate the power of the Dark Side? Luke then lies about his droids to get them onto the barge - lying? Lies? In a Jedi?Nevertheless, I'm taking Captain Solo and his friends. You can either profit by this or be destroyed. It's your choice, but I warn you not to underestimate my power
[HEADING=3]Okay, what are your thoughts?[/HEADING]Without trying to spoiler the article any more, we can trace the implications of his growing fanatic embrace of the Dark Side throughout the climactic scene in the Emperor's Tower on the second Death Star.
For my part, I invite you all to watch the final scenes [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_RFYoZ7H67A] with this thought in mind: "Luke goes crazy, snaps and attacks the Emperor, freaks and whales on his dad, gets mindblown by his power after beating Vader, manipulates Vader into throwing the Emperor off a ledge just as the Emperor did to Anakin in the third movie when he cut off Mace Windu's hands, and is contemplating ruling the galaxy as father and son until a genuinely reformed Vader begs him to let him die.
Pay attention to how Hamill acts his character. The weird restrained, distant indecision and unbalance that we all picked up on when we were first getting to know this movie neatly translates as the actions of a snapped maniac who is now wandering into foggy Dark parts unknown. The final scene in this part of the film, where he takes Vader's helmet off, is the most intriguing - he is clearly at a loss to convince his dad to remain on the Dark Side, and struggling to find the words to dissuade him. He insists that Vader allow him to take him away and save him. save him, like Anakin yearned to save his wife?
Personally I love this viewing of the film. I really freaking love it. I think I'm going to keep both interpretations in my head and employ them when I see fit - watching the film with Luke as an already-gone Dark Jedi, or watching it as I have always watched it before today. Luke is such a more interesting character - a really modern character - when one imagines him as a failure who simply gets away with it.
I just really like how this theory actually seems to beef up the prequel trilogy, tying in a lot of the writing and increasing the meaning of scenes such as Windu's fall. Also it makes Luke much more human, an orphan who has idolized his father growing up in a harsh environment and gone on to emulate him all too literally - unlike Leia, who grew up in an environment of love on Alderaan and seems remarkably airy-fairy at the end of Episode VI...
I guess all we can do now is wait to see what Luke's up to in The Force Awakens.