HORTON HEARS A WHO
[small]A Movie Review by - Kyle "Tootmania" Sorrell[/small]
Horton Hears A Who (Directed by Jimmy Hayward, and also created by the same team behind the popular Ice Age franchise) is the first fully CGI-animated film based on one of the many children's stories created by Dr. Seuss. It follows the story of an eccentric, yet lovable elephant named Horton (voiced by Jim Carrey), who, whilst going about his usual business in the jungle of Nool, comes across a speck on a clover, from which he hears the cries and musings of a microscopic city known as Who-ville.
Here's a picture that basically summarizes what kind of vibe or experience one can expect from this film:
Horton Hears A Who, more or less, runs like a long, expensive episode of Warner Bros. Bugs Bunny or Looney Tunes. Not that it's a bad thing. Perhaps the single greatest aspect of this film is how bright and energetic and "zany" everything is. Not a moment goes by without someone zipping across the screen as a colorful motion blur, or some law of physics being broken, or Horton being, well, Horton.
There are many, perhaps too many, movies out now based around talking CGI-animals, but so few ever take as full advantage of the medium as this film does. Sure, you could criticize the fact that the architecture in Who-ville is technically impossible, or that an elephant inflating his trunk like a balloon help him float over a tight rope is downright mad, but there in lies the fun! There in lies the purpose, the entire point of using computer generated graphics to begin with - to make the impossible, possible. Well, at least in products of the entertainment industry.
Another problem, though perhaps more of a personal criticism, would be some of the support characters, and even the other main character, the Mayor.
There are also a fair amount of, for the most part, under-used/ineffectual support characters as well. Most of which add nothing of value or substance to the film. Some may also not like how "overactive" the characters are animated. Most everything here as a very bouncy, sporadic feel to its movement. Again, some may find it aesthetically displeasing.