I like the game but I can't stand deovted halo multiplayers. no offense, but those guys just really take the fun out of multiplayer
It was, as far as I'm aware, the first really successful console shooter. Had great graphics and sound(at the time), enjoyable multiplayer, and it fit what had been a PC-specific genre onto a simple controller. I think that it was the first to do the "carry two weapons" thing. Now think of how many games do that and you can see how far the roots have spread.Syphous said:I liked the first one. No idea how it became such a phenomenon though.
GoldenEye 007 on the N64 did everything you mentioned, except possibly for having great graphics. They were fuzzy, (as were all N64 games,) but it did have a smooth frame rate. Halo was the 1st to do all that on the Xbox. Halo did everything GoldenEye did, but did it with next gen graphics & sound, as well as being able to play with even more people over a network. That's probably what made it so popular.northeast rower said:It was, as far as I'm aware, the first really successful console shooter. Had great graphics and sound(at the time), enjoyable multiplayer, and it fit what had been a PC-specific genre onto a simple controller. I think that it was the first to do the "carry two weapons" thing. Now think of how many games do that and you can see how far the roots have spread.Syphous said:I liked the first one. No idea how it became such a phenomenon though.
I don't know why, but Forge confuses me. Maybe I'm just not...Forge-y enough.Griphphin said:I do like Halo. Forge in Reach is just fantastic!